URBANDAWGPOUND
Active member
Thoughts ?
What is the wisdom of the DE's being lined up inside the tackle if the goal is to set the edge? If you just straight bull rush directly lined up (and inside) the tackle, you're engaging with the entire tackle and his center of gravity. Taking on "the full man." If you get out a little further in your alignment, you can attack "half the man." The goal is to NOT get pinned in. There are several different moves the edges can take into the strike zone of the furthest-wide blocker they'd be engaged with (primarily the tackles) when they're leveraged -- but if they're engaged with too much of the blocker then they are toast.I didn't understand how we played our Def Ends in 4 point stances( inside shoulder of their tackle??) all damn night, and that big running back and QB kept getting the corner all night ..they were sealing them to the inside and I was floored on why they didn't stand them up and shoot across and force New Albany to make it flow back to the middle?!!...
Given how physically imposing (and quick) Garnes #44 was as a FB, my guess is LHS didn’t want the play turned back inside?What is the wisdom of the DE's being lined up inside the tackle if the goal is to set the edge? If you just straight bull rush directly lined up (and inside) the tackle, you're engaging with the entire tackle and his center of gravity. Taking on "the full man." If you get out a little further in your alignment, you can attack "half the man." The goal is to NOT get pinned in. There are several different moves the edges can take into the strike zone of the furthest-wide blocker they'd be engaged with (primarily the tackles) when they're leveraged -- but if they're engaged with too much of the blocker then they are toast.
I'm not trying to criticize Urban or the coaches, only addressing the account described. That defensive end alignment, described in the above quote, seems counterintuitive.
yes, but it's not ideal for there to be a mile distance between the field and stands either! Come on, man. Olentangy has beautiful schools (been inside Liberty and Berlin), but really disappointing facilities on the basis of "viewer friendliness."Olentangy schools have a cookie cutter stadium model, they are all exactly the same.
I didn't go to this, but this sounds exactly like the Lancaster team that showed up in the scrimmage vs Westerville North. Braves game they looked like they tightened up and improved, kinda fell back to some flatness and sloppiness vs New Albany (bad tackling, kids not rising to the defensive gameplan as a unit.) Jekyll-Hyde team, perhaps, but it really doesn't surprise me to read this just having an idea of what the worst imaginable performance for the Gales would look like -- and how that "worst imaginable" is closer to the mean for them than folks like I would think.Perhaps a better question to be asking yourself is, what the hell is that team that Lancaster is fielding?
There's just no polite way to put it, Lancaster is an extremely poor football team. This is probably the worst team Berlin has played outside of Columbus City Schools in the 3+ years of their existence. ...[L]ancaster blocked nobody, gave up huge holes on D, and had skill players absolutely running circles around them.
Noted.When a team gets out to a 28-0 in just over 1 quarter, there's many different ways it can happen. The team behind can make mistakes, pick sixes, give up a KOR, commit horrible penalties. None of that happened here. Berlin flat out beat the snot out of them at all 11 positions every play. Lancaster wasn't making any mistakes, they were just completely overmatched, and I was 100% shocked that it was happening.
Berlin is a slightly above average football team with faults, they are going to get pounded by teams like Liberty and Marysville on their schedule. But against Lancaster, they looked like world beaters.
4 different Berlin players just outran the entire defense and scored on long 40+ yard TD plays running or passing
Lancaster coaching was absolutely awful, playing man coverage with zero safety help even after 2 of those long TD plays had already happened. How do you not adjust? How many times do your DBs have to get smoked before you make a change?
Can their line pass block? No, not really. Or my guess is they probably can't beyond five plays. Gales have more than one kid who can consistently get open, create space and thread through a zone? Probably not... they seldom seem to, at least. Guess this is more of a 'chicken or the egg' dilemma: are these personnel 'failures' a product of the coaching staff, or just the talent being super shallow?Said it before and I'll say it again, as fans it astonishes me that you guys put up with having to sit thru watching that incredibly inept and archaic offensive game plan. Can't blame the kids, as soon as they couldn't run, they tried throwing, and since it's not engrained in their system, they execute poorly and throw INTs left and right.
On things I'm not there to see, like this game and a closer understanding of what goes on in the film room*practice, I defer to those who know the Gales better. Although I largely respect KI on all sorts of matters and topics, I politely disagree on the last part: not a lot of talent that would be considered "above average" to begin with (lack of talent NECESSARY to compete against good OCC teams.) Line's a liability, but is there anyone better and more qualified? Probably not. So, right now I just don't see where a real shift in offensive philosophy (balanced; zone-running and intermediate passing out of the spread) is going to make things better when they probably don't have the necessary tools to make those systems thrive (let alone work.)And nothing puts a bigger smile on my face than when chop block calls are made as the kids struggle to unlearn the dirty, finally now illegal, blocking techniques that used to be the core of this system.
I know there are some extremely good ppl in Lancaster, and that's why I just can't believe that y'all continue to tolerate this. You unfortunately are likely to get a running clock put on you in many more games until you start demanding change.
You and I bothI thought this game would be closer