Lakota West GMC Champ for 2007?

L

lacotaHammaEAST

New member
I just got to thinking about next year, and i realize that sycamore will be weaker next year. With the loss of Sandy Berry, Minosh, and Greg Martin, I think syacamore could finish 2nd place in the GMC the next few years.

Lakota West VS. Sycamore
1st singles: Lippert def. Bernstein
2nd singles: Broda or Dray Eucks(if he decides to play) Defeats Patel
3rd singles: Broda or Eucks Defeats Naugle
1st doubes: arozarena/sachdeva Loses to Arenstein/Dennis
2nd Doubes: walker/giraldo loses to Cohen/Hall

West wins 3-2

in case your wondering, Dray Eucks is a baller who never plays, but is still pretty good.

does anybody want to contest my prediction?
 
Last edited:
 
lacotaHammaEAST said:
does anybody want to contest my prediction?
Click to expand...

Yes I do.

Rohan "Roheeshka" Patel is a hardcore battler that can never be counted out. He can summon his inner serve-and-volley tactics at just the right time, putting pressure on his opponents. This combined with the discovery that Broda literally doesn't know how to slice could cause trouble for the Brod-meister.

I recall that Patel has even had some intense matches with Pat Hamning.... :p
 
the last time that rohan played taylor, taylor made him look like an inconsistent toolbag. the score was 6-2 6-1. Taylor is way too steady for rohan. if it turns out that dray Eucks plays 2nd singles, thats a different story. dray is not as consistent as taylor but hes got a big serve and he can hit some big shots. dont get me wrong. i think rohan is a straight up baller. i have had some pretty close matches with him. But i still beat him. may i mention i'm 3-0 against him. what now. lol
 
Last edited:
i mean one change in a person could mean everything changes. Wyatt will be first. If Drey plays he will be 2nd or 3rd. Taylor will be 2nd or 3rd. Then i will be at first dubs probably and whoever steps up from the other guys will be my partner. I'm not suere it all depends on tryouts.
 
lacotaHammaEAST said:
I just got to thinking about next year, and i realize that sycamore will be weaker next year. With the loss of Sandy Berry, Minosh, and Greg Martin, I think syacamore could finish 2nd place in the GMC the next few years.

Lakota West VS. Sycamore
1st singles: Lippert def. Bernstein
2nd singles: Broda or Dray Eucks(if he decides to play) Defeats Patel
3rd singles: Broda or Eucks Defeats Naugle
1st doubes: arozarena/sachdeva Loses to Arenstein/Dennis
2nd Doubes: walker/giraldo loses to Cohen/Hall

West wins 3-2

in case your wondering, Dray Eucks is a baller who never plays, but is still pretty good.

does anybody want to contest my prediction?
Click to expand...

If Carl tries he'll wtfown Wyatt.
Rohan's match is a tossup, with either player.

Sycamore will rape you guys at first doubles, which is the only thing you've gotten right so far, because yes naugle would lose but I don't think he'll play singles. If they put Scott there I doubt Eucks is patient enough. I dunno who he is I'm just saying.

Hall/Cohen have both graduated kthxbye.

And the Milford Eagles are going to beat all of you guys anyways unless our FAVC switch is next year, in which case, Mason will win the GMC.
 
Tballer said:
If Carl tries he'll wtfown Wyatt.
Rohan's match is a tossup, with either player.

Sycamore will rape you guys at first doubles, which is the only thing you've gotten right so far, because yes naugle would lose but I don't think he'll play singles. If they put Scott there I doubt Eucks is patient enough. I dunno who he is I'm just saying.

Hall/Cohen have both graduated kthxbye.

And the Milford Eagles are going to beat all of you guys anyways unless our FAVC switch is next year, in which case, Mason will win the GMC.
Click to expand...

good joke about milford, their best player is bunker, if that says anything, as for the sycamore west prediction, i can understand your respect for carls game, who wouldnt. in the 05 season, he worked up on everybody, mehan, shidler, and beat alot of players 6-0 6-0, he was godly back then, BUT, this year, one of those kids who he beat last year 6-0 6-0, taylor broda, beat carl this year. the point i'm trying to make is that carl absolutly sucked this year compared to last year. i dont think carl will have enough patience and game to stick around with lippert, unless that five seasons stereotype about all those players being notorius grinders comes into play, in which case i could see carl beating wyatt like that. if his game gets as worse as it did. i'm not saying carl is terrible now, he worked up on me during the season. but he is not the player he was in 2005.
 
now referring to your comment about broda and patel, i can also understand why you would underrate taylor, he is one of the most hateable kids in the ovta, next to chris hall. unless rohan has been showing some magic lately, i wont ever think rohan has a chance in ---- of taking taylor. that is no tossup.
i forgot about the possibility of scott playing 3rd singles, thanx for bringing that to my attention. if dray decides to play, they should put him at 3rd behind broda, if that does happen, that match would be a tossup.
 
To begin with, Carl pulled a mega tank last year against Broda, so I am not impressed. And whether or not I can tolerate Broda or Hall has nothing to do with how I rank them. Oh and since we are looking at Carl's past season, might as well bring up Broda's loss to Streicker. If Streicker can beat Broda I would give roughly the same odds to Rohan.
 
i wasnt saying that taylor is so good because he beat carl this year, i was just saying that taylor is more consistent than rohan, refering to clownpounders comment about rohan being a serve and volleyer, i've played with taylor long enough to know that if you come into the net on taylor, he'll pass you 90% of the time with no pressure, so that wouldnt be a good idea. now if rohan were to try to bash it out or grind against taylor, he still would have to outlast him. unless i see rohan play a full three set match without being irratic (meaning have two great games and then hit 20 balls in the parking lot), and i see rohan being more steady from the baseline, theres no way taylor could lose.
 
about taylors match with streiker, whether taylor played good or bad is out of the question, he always says he plays bad when he loses, streicker was playing out of his mind considering the match was outside. another thing, taylor hits right into aarons wheelhouse, meaning flat and waist high. with aarons form, and how he hits the ball. he would feel right at home against taylor. we've seen in the past that aaron hates players who hit any kind of spin, whether its a slice or a topspin shot or junk, he tends to find a problem with every kind of shot except taylors shots, which are the same thing every time, flat waist high. may i note that aaron has an uncle who he hits with alot and hits the same way as taylor does. so aaron would be pretty youst to it. so i can understand taylor losing to a player like aaron.
 
since you brought up taylors treeing marathon when he played carl when he supposedly tanked, its okay i would use that as my excuse too if i lost to the skinniest most balleristic nerd on the planet, LOL I'm just messing with ya.
 
everyone, i am officially the biggest joke on the planet. i just found out that dray eucks isnt gonna play next year. so whenever you see me you can laugh in my face as hard as you want knowing that i deserve it. now that dray wont play that totally eliminates the possibility of west beating sycamore
 
lacotaHammaEAST said:
about taylors match with streiker, whether taylor played good or bad is out of the question, he always says he plays bad when he loses, streicker was playing out of his mind considering the match was outside. another thing, taylor hits right into aarons wheelhouse, meaning flat and waist high. with aarons form, and how he hits the ball. he would feel right at home against taylor. we've seen in the past that aaron hates players who hit any kind of spin, whether its a slice or a topspin shot or junk, he tends to find a problem with every kind of shot except taylors shots, which are the same thing every time, flat waist high. may i note that aaron has an uncle who he hits with alot and hits the same way as taylor does. so aaron would be pretty youst to it. so i can understand taylor losing to a player like aaron.
Click to expand...

Yea Streicker really isn't that good against players that don't hit the ball to him the way he likes. I've seen him play amazing if someone hits the ball the way he likes, and then get killed against another style.

He isn't really even comparable to Bernstein. Bernstein would tool all over him in like 5 minutes.
 
theres a difference between rohans serving and volleying and your serving and volleying, with the way you serve and volley, you would beat taylor 1,0. let me explain

when rohan hits his volleys, they land in between the service line and the baseline. taylors stokes are so short that he can put it past rohan with no problem.

when you (wyatt lippert) serve and volley, you put your volleys like really short and low in the service box, and as we've seen, taylor has terrible vertical movement, so he would just pop it right up to you for the put away.
 
re

lacotaHammaEAST said:
I just got to thinking about next year, and i realize that sycamore will be weaker next year. With the loss of Sandy Berry, Minosh, and Greg Martin, I think syacamore could finish 2nd place in the GMC the next few years.

Lakota West VS. Sycamore
1st singles: Lippert def. Bernstein
2nd singles: Broda or Dray Eucks(if he decides to play) Defeats Patel
3rd singles: Broda or Eucks Defeats Naugle
1st doubes: arozarena/sachdeva Loses to Arenstein/Dennis
2nd Doubes: walker/giraldo loses to Cohen/Hall

West wins 3-2

in case your wondering, Dray Eucks is a baller who never plays, but is still pretty good.

does anybody want to contest my prediction?
Click to expand...

I think Bernstein and lippert will be close. I dont think its a lock.
 
Yappi_Tennis said:
I think Bernstein and lippert will be close. I dont think its a lock.
Click to expand...


Bernstein is one of the worst players i have ever seen walk between the lines. His serve is all wrong. And he approaches the net like a woman. This is guys tennis lets get it together:hello:
 
thats a little bit too rash to say that hes bad, dont you think john what ever your name is. he may approach the net like a women. but his serve bounces a mile high.
 
johnny my boy, let me tell you that ithink i know why you say that. Bc i think u lost him and r bitter. and if that is false well than i guess your a dyke. But carl is not bad, he plays like a woman but if he trys he can win like a woman as well
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top