AllSports12
Moderator
Scientists that get their money from the government will feed the government whatever statistics government wants to be fed.
Perpetuating the debunked myth of disappearing polar bears isn’t really helping your case.
You beat me to it. ?This is a great example of the lie that you and others fall for. The truth is that Polar Bear numbers are higher now then they've been for the last 50 years. There is NO evidence that Polar Bear numbers have been impacted by Global Warming. In fact the evidence is just the opposite.
Nah, the government is filled with nothing but virtuous people, not any that may have an agenda.Scientists that get their money from the government will feed the government whatever statistics government wants to be fed.
I did not even notice that at first. I must admit, that is funny.The Trudeau blackface was a nice touch.
What about all of the ones that do not? What about the ones paid by Big Oil?Scientists that get their money from the government will feed the government whatever statistics government wants to be fed.
Does this mean McDonalds won’t have filet o fish?This is what natural climate variation looks like. It is often massive and happens very quickly.
Ancient warming fueled massive marine dead zones in North Pacific
Over the past 1.2 million years, marine life repeatedly disappeared from large swaths of the North Pacific.www.upi.com
These global warming induced ocean die offs repeatably happened long before SUV's graced the Earth.
For the science inclined here's the actual paper:
Science | AAAS
advances.sciencemag.org
No worry this happened thousands of years ago.Does this mean McDonalds won’t have filet o fish?
This idea was trotted out long ago, during Obama I'm thinking. Joe is likely confused that he is no longer the VP.This is bad science, terrible history and even worse current affairs:
BREAKING: Biden tells troops ‘global warming’ is the ‘greatest threat to America’
“This is not a joke. Y’know what the Joint Chiefs told us the greatest threat facing America was? Global warming,” the president told the troops at Suffolk Air Force Base.thepostmillennial.com
Horrible thought process.Even if human caused GLOBAL climate change is real - and I don't think it is - this is why our ONLY option is adaptation:
Is it? So you're fine with the USA crippling its economy to reduce CO2 emissions while China and other nations drastically increase theirs? How is that supposed to solve the "problem" of Global Warming?Horrible thought process.
Did you read and understand the article you posted IB?^ Lol
lotr10 posted a blog post based on a study by McColl and Berg. Disengeniously, the blog makes it seem as if there is nothing to see here and everyone has been wrong about expansion of desert and dry areas and therefore, of course, global warming is a myth. Lol.
Here is an article explaining the McColl and Berg study with more truth. They never deny the world is not warming, in fact they acknowledge it.
Climate change may not expand drylands
New analysis highlights uncertainty about the future state of drylandswww.seas.harvard.edu
Did you read the article? LolDid you read and understand the article you posted IB?
Here's the key statement from the article which contradicts the doom saying of Global Warming alarmists:
“Our research shows that while some drylands may expand, climate models don’t project that there will be a dramatic and rapid global expansion of drylands,” said McColl.
Pretty clear that these scientists are saying they aren't seeing evidence of expanding deserts as a result of climate change. What is your interpretation of their work?
And there was nothing disingenuous about how the WUWT blog talked about the McColl & Berg paper. In fact they linked to the paper so that everyone could easily read what the authors had published. Here's the Abstract from their publication:
Drylands, comprising land regions characterized by water-limited, sparse vegetation, have commonly been projected to expand globally under climate warming. Such projections, however, rely on an atmospheric proxy for drylands, the aridity index, which has recently been shown to yield qualitatively incorrect projections of various components of the terrestrial water cycle. Here, we use an alternative index of drylands, based directly on relevant ecohydrological variables, and compare projections of both indices in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 climate models as well as Dynamic Global Vegetation Models. The aridity index overestimates simulated ecohydrological index changes. This divergence reflects different index sensitivities to hydroclimate change and opposite responses to the physiological effect on vegetation of increasing atmospheric CO2. Atmospheric aridity is thus not an accurate proxy of the future extent of drylands. Despite greater uncertainties than in atmospheric projections, climate model ecohydrological projections indicate no global drylands expansion under greenhouse warming, contrary to previous claims based on atmospheric aridity.
So how exactly was the WUWT blog being disingenuous?
And for the record a lot of us skeptics are willing to agree that the climate is warming. The difference is that we believe the evidence supports the idea that this warming is natural. It's a result of the Earth coming out of the last Ice Age. And the climate will continue to warm naturally until we start back into another Ice Age.
This is simply not true. You are misrepresenting what my point was here:Did you read the article? Lol
“As the climate is warming, there is a divergence between atmospheric and land surface behavior,” said Berg.
To account for that divergence, McColl and Berg developed a new metric of drylands, based on land surface properties, including biological responses to higher atmospheric CO2, and compared drylands projections to those derived solely from atmospheric metrics.
“Our research shows that while some drylands may expand, climate models don’t project that there will be a dramatic and rapid global expansion of drylands,” said McColl.
However, simulating complex land processes remains challenging in global models.
“There is still a lot of uncertainty about how vegetation and the water cycle will change in a warming world,” said McColl.
AGAIN, your blogger and more so you, disingenuously point to the idea that drylands not expanding as evidence that Global Warming is not real. Of course wattsupwiththat picked up the BLOG and all of its BS.
One of the common fallacies I see in the arguments of those that support the theory that humans are causing catastrophic Global Warming is the notion that Skeptics are all in one group claiming Global Warming doesn't exist. This is BS and I suspect a deflection from having to actually engage over the science.AGAIN, your blogger and more so you, disingenuously point to the idea that drylands not expanding as evidence that Global Warming is not real. Of course wattsupwiththat picked up the BLOG and all of its BS.
Climate change has made Central Americans illiterate, and wanting to seek new digs with free shtThis is why Global Warming has been hopelessly politicized. BTW there is ZERO evidence that climate change has hurt Central American farmers.
WATCH: AOC blames US climate policy for illegal immigration
“And the reason this is a problem, and this is not just US supporting regime change, this is also climate policy that is impacting the global south disproportionately,” she said.thepostmillennial.com
Did you read and understand the article you posted IB?
Did you understand the article that was posted East? And I'm talking about the Scientific Article that these authors published and was linked to at WUWT. It's really not that hard. These scientists looked at whether global warming would increase desertification. They concluded that their model indicated that deserts would not grow as a result of the warming. What was your take?and this examples how LOTR supports his delusions.
Why the f would anyone think you're credible when you make a statement like that? You define tone deaf. Did YOU read and understand the article he posted?
I'll answer for you. "No."
See how easy that was to do?