Coy Hyre, Brookville, 10.55, 21.60

 
I think your question has been answered with the posted results: NO WIND INFO

Therefore, great times, but not eligible for all-time lists of legal times (wind < +2.0 mps)
 
JAVMAN83 said:
I think your question has been answered with the posted results: NO WIND INFO

Therefore, great times, but not eligible for all-time lists of legal times (wind < +2.0 mps)
Click to expand...
Tre Tucker ran 10.41 at our place in 2019. We did not have a wind gauge. I felt sick. It was a bad weather day (wet) , but not particularly windy and he crushed 3 other pretty good guys. Hand timed by some very experienced timers as back up at the line. He was 10.11. So, within reason. All the hand times for that and every other race were within reason, so the timing system wasn't off. He was 10.69 in the semi's and then came back and went 21.84 in the 200, so a pretty good day overall. I'm not 100% sure, but that 10.41 would have been an all divisions state record at the time and would still be a D2 record. No idea what the wind was though, but it seemed like, if there was, it only benefited him.

I checked every hand time that day against every FAT time to make sure there wasn't something off. They were all within reason. There were one or two other really good times that day, but not 10.41
 
psycho_dad said:
Tre Tucker ran 10.41 at our place in 2019. We did not have a wind gauge. I felt sick. It was a bad weather day (wet) , but not particularly windy and he crushed 3 other pretty good guys. Hand timed by some very experienced timers as back up at the line. He was 10.11. So, within reason. All the hand times for that and every other race were within reason, so the timing system wasn't off. He was 10.69 in the semi's and then came back and went 21.84 in the 200, so a pretty good day overall. I'm not 100% sure, but that 10.41 would have been an all divisions state record at the time and would still be a D2 record. No idea what the wind was though, but it seemed like, if there was, it only benefited him.

I checked every hand time that day against every FAT time to make sure there wasn't something off. They were all within reason. There were one or two other really good times that day, but not 10.41
Click to expand...
You must be talking about the Woodridge Wrap-Up on 4 May 2019? I have that under my "wind-aided/no-wind info" performances list. If there had been a wind reading available at or under the +2.0 mps limit, it would've been a D2 & all-divisions record at the time.
 
JAVMAN83 said:
You must be talking about the Woodridge Wrap-Up on 4 May 2019? I have that under my "wind-aided/no-wind info" performances list. If there had been a wind reading available at or under the +2.0 mps limit, it would've been a D2 & all-divisions record at the time.
Click to expand...
Yep, Still makes me sick we didn't have one. It might have been above allowable, but who knows. Didn't seem like it. Nice Meet and Stadium record though. He ran 10.59 at the Regional 10.67 in prelim and only 10.90 in the finals to win at the State meet. I just kept hoping he'd run faster some place to get the record. Of course, he could also have had a false start flyer that wasn't called, but he won by 10 meters.

Kid that was 11.15 ran 11.27 that day. 11.23 kid went 11.28 and 11.11 kid was 11.37, so again, no one else PR'd or did anything outrageous to make us think there was anything wrong with the time. Just no wind reading.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top