The Dock
Persona Non Grata
Central_Ohio’s post (#24) lays it out better.I think we are having a different discussion if we are talking about media coverage of rural teams vs whether or not they belong in consolidated top 10s. I see plenty of small school coverage in Dispatch, FFN TV shows and the like, so not sure what you are arguing there.
In a consolidated top 10, I don’t see a BC or Alder being worthy in there. My point is ideally “consolidated” top 10’s get eschewed in mainstream football discussions (at least in the media) in favor of “Big” and “Small” top 10’s.
The coverage is pitiful, and typically with little context that recognizes the top-shelf small schools as being good. Maybe it’s not the media’s job to characterize nor assign who is “good” in discussion of teams — but they already do that with their “Top n” rankings, which are nearly exclusive to the big schools.Just because media are correctly not putting them in top 10s doesn't mean they are avoiding coverage of them.