3rd Knuckle
New member
Heck of a run at Canfield lately
Heck of a run at Canfield lately
This would depend on the staff and school. Maybe in Canfield they do it that way. Being a coordinator is very important though, shows your ability to formulate a game plan and execute that game plan which you would think is a big part of being a head coach.This isn't college or NFL. Him not being a coordinator doesn't matter whatsoever. Not saying he is or isn't the best guy for the job, but again, the whole coordinator thing in HS football is basically taboo.
You have a point there - depending on the school.This would depend on the staff and school. Maybe in Canfield they do it that way. Being a coordinator is very important though, shows your ability to formulate a game plan and execute that game plan which you would think is a big part of being a head coach.
Ignazio did lead Boardman to the playoffs, but we dont know who is being kept on staff at Canfield...posters are assuming they hired within to do that, and maybe that is the case but we don't know that yet.
Will they hire the new coach to work in the building is the biggest question....shows alot of commitment to him if they are willing and able to do that.
So you are saying that its Boardman administrations fault for not being very good at football and not the head coaches. Fair enough. Still have to question choosing a head coach who has not had success over one of the best in the tri-county area who has already had high levels of success..Killed some time, did some quick research.
In the past 20 years w/5 different HC's, Boardman won 82 games...............an average of 4 per yer. (rounded)
In Ignazio's 8 years he won 32 games...................an average of 4 per year.
Take out Ignazio's years and wins, Boardman won 50 games in 12 years.........an average of 4 per year. (rounded)
Since Ignazio left, Boardman has won 9 games in 3 years w/2 different HC's.........an average of 3 per year.
That's all.
P.S. I don't care who Canfield's HC is or how they arrived at their decision.
Very few schools have a Head Coach that does not coordinate / calls on one side of the ball. For example, you are telling me that the new HC at Harding called the plays at Hoban as the OC while Tyrell acted as Head Coach. Let's be serious. The vast majority of time the hiring of the Head Coach is through connections / networks / friendships / etc. Many great assistant coaches go unnoticed as potential head coaches due to a lack of connections & networking.You have a point there - depending on the school.
Question though, if a big part of being a HC is to formulate a game plan and execute the game plan, what's the point of a coordinator and what's their job specifics?
I've always disagreed with the "You must be a coordinator to qualify as a HC" statements. I agree with the "putting in your time aspect" but if you're not coordinating as a HC, why do you need coordinating experience? There are more ways to delegate job duties than being a coordinator, which, by the way, the HC still delegates the tasks in his program. Point being, the person who treats the kids the best, gets the best out of his players and coaches, can communicate and motivate, and is knowledgeable about the game should qualify, not whether or not you coordinated.
Kinda to my point, the coordinating thing is overrated. Who'dya know????Very few schools have a Head Coach that does not coordinate / calls on one side of the ball. For example, you are telling me that the new HC at Harding called the plays at Hoban as the OC while Tyrell acted as Head Coach. Let's be serious. The vast majority of time the hiring of the Head Coach is through connections / networks / friendships / etc. Many great assistant coaches go unnoticed as potential head coaches due to a lack of connections & networking.
I wouldn't be surprised if things turned out very similarly to when he was coaching Boardman where he is not able to get the results he should get with the talent available to him.Hard to believe Canfield wouldn’t have had a candidate w/ a little stronger resume or upside.
Im sure that Coach Prologo has had his fill of working under a bad administration. Enough for a lifetime in fact. Bad administrations seem to be an epidemic in our area. Administrators want their own little fifedoms with people they can control completely under them rather than people who will be best for the school and students.Pro should be happy they didn’t hire him. Now the info coming out is ridiculous, pav controlled whole process. After speaking to 2 of the coaches I found out Pro had majority of staff staying on including Ciminero, he also offered to donate his coaches salary back to pay more coaches. The committee chose to create a job in the school for a ignazio who was 32-49 instead of a guy who’s coached in 4 state title games. This hire will cost the district just short of 100k when a proven winner was free. This committee including the superintendent chose to do this to appease pav.
I can only infer that pav was adamant that the next guy be a mediocre coach to protect his legacy.
My calculation has Pro coaching at Canfield for 16 years, 11 under Pav. Ignazio has been there 2. I’m so happy for Pro that he doesn’t have to deal with that administration going forward. And it seems Pav wants to control program he walked away from, that would not be good for Pro.
This situation is crazy coming out of a district that can’t pass a levy
I don't know much about Ignazio but he has landed 2 of the 4 biggest public school jobs in the valley. Does sound like Pav was in on this process but I also don't think Ignazio should have to apologize for getting a teaching job, if that is happening. He didn't hire himself....one might argue that it actually shows the administration stepping up. Not sure it was a good idea to give that community more of a reason not to pass a levy.Pro should be happy they didn’t hire him. Now the info coming out is ridiculous, pav controlled whole process. After speaking to 2 of the coaches I found out Pro had majority of staff staying on including Ciminero, he also offered to donate his coaches salary back to pay more coaches. The committee chose to create a job in the school for a ignazio who was 32-49 instead of a guy who’s coached in 4 state title games. This hire will cost the district just short of 100k when a proven winner was free. This committee including the superintendent chose to do this to appease pav.
I can only infer that pav was adamant that the next guy be a mediocre coach to protect his legacy.
My calculation has Pro coaching at Canfield for 16 years, 11 under Pav. Ignazio has been there 2. I’m so happy for Pro that he doesn’t have to deal with that administration going forward. And it seems Pav wants to control program he walked away from, that would not be good for Pro.
This situation is crazy coming out of a district that can’t pass a levy
You lost me at little league coach ...in all seriousness, who is this person? Where did they coach?There was an outstanding candidate who didn't even get an interview. He coached youth football in Canfield for years with great success and always wanted to keep progressing up the ranks. However, he was shut out of a middle school coaching position at Canfield, so he moved to one of the area's elite programs to gain experience under a highly successful coach. But apparently that wasn't enough to warrant an interview. We'll see how this shakes out for Canfield football.
Still waiting on receiving that thank you card from Ursuline for D Taylor and Likens.Hopefully this keeps Yappi afloat during the dog months as well as the JFK debacle did!
Pav thinks his legacy is his W-L record, when in reality it's dodging any team with a pulse in the regular season and hand-selecting a lessor of two coaches so he looks better when that coach fails. And I was bombarded by Canfield posters when I said Pav was soft.
LOLI, for one, am glad that Canfield decided to slip back into mediocrity....