GCLFanboy1972
Member
So you see you was wrong about the running stat, so let’s try to backpedal out of the original statement to suit our narrative. When teams see they can’t run the ball on you they throw thats football 101. And again no players that will be playing college football; reading comprehension may not be your strong point. Just to be clear 2.5 lower than 3.0 it’s OK
Again. Math isn’t your strong point I see. Neither are logical thoughts and complete sentences. Madison only had the ball run on them 41 times. They then proceeded to get gashed in the air. Brookville had it ran against them for 51 times for 3.8 a carry. Bacon had it ran against them 60 times for 3.0 a carry, and there was no point where Carlisle had any consistent success. For a team that doesn’t play against the option at all, that would seem like success, especially if you’re on the field for the entire game. Bacon’s O played 19 plays. If it’s “football 101” to pass when you can’t run, why did Carlisle not opt for that against Bacon since Bacon held them to 3.0 a carry? That’s because they couldn’t pass if they wanted to. The only narrative that’s being played is your inability to see the facts to uphold your wanna be ESPN analyst take. Not sure where I was wrong, but I’ll leave you to the story in your head.