cabezadecaballo
Well-known member
Larry!!!This is not new - grandmama was around in the 90s.
Larry!!!This is not new - grandmama was around in the 90s.
Well, sure. This^ is SO obviously the right answer for the scenario. We ALL have to make choices and prioritize in life.I think we are looking at this all wrong. If you as a man decide that you want to become as much of a woman as you can then grow the boobs and have your parts cut off. I just do not know where because you do those things it gives you the right to participate in women's sports. I feel if a person thinks it is so important to try and change their sex they should realize and accept that means giving up the playing of sports. No matter what every person that plays sports comes to a time when the playing comes to an end. I feel that a person that thinks a sex change is the only answer should also say the playing of sports comes to an end at that time.
The Wokish Universe.It what universe would chopping off your schlong and becoming a woman be considered 'hip or cool'?
Geesh.
There's a good sociological study out there that shows the most pronounced problem is something like a 1600% increase in early teenage girls transitioning because they're "transgender." But in reality they're any normal teenager that gets depressed periodically, saw something on TV they're too young to understand, and a combination of media/certain parents/certain docs are waiting with testosterone. And anyone who has ever had to take a steroid knows testosterone makes you feel GREAT. Thus the fantasy is validated by getting doped up. Alphabet mafia canned the paper, may have even forced it to be retracted.Just the attention-seeking losers of Gen Z, really, imho. Kids that were intellectually/emotionally abandoned by clueless parents and surrendered over to "the village" that the Hildabeast envisioned, etc. - they are screwed, sure. The freak element does seem to get freakier, and I am mostly basing my hopes upon NEO kids.
My kids' friends are pretty refreshing, all things considered, if the best reflection of their own values is how they view their own peers. In view of the many rando millenials I spent time with before I retired, these kids I've seen and heard most around my home, in the dorms, etc. seem to be awake and aware of trash pop psychology, fake news political BS, and crazed social pressures from the fools on the fringes of America. Keep the faith, and encourage all the normalcy you can find.
I’m sure the study wasn’t based on science, at least not the “correct” science.There's a good sociological study out there that shows the most pronounced problem is something like a 1600% increase in early teenage girls transitioning because they're "transgender." But in reality they're any normal teenager that gets depressed periodically, saw something on TV they're too young to understand, and a combination of media/certain parents/certain docs are waiting with testosterone. And anyone who has ever had to take a steroid knows testosterone makes you feel GREAT. Thus the fantasy is validated by getting doped up. Alphabet mafia canned the paper, may have even forced it to be retracted.
One can both (correctly) make the point that it hardly ever happens and still disagree with it. Oversimplified, this is my position.Anyone who celebrates this sort of thing (or attempts to minimize it by saying "it hardly ever happens" is pathetic.
One can both (correctly) make the point that it hardly ever happens and still disagree with it. Oversimplified, this is my position.
Because it's true. Just because you heard of this incident and perhaps a few others doesn't mean it's ("it" being trans athletes competing in sports against the sex opposite the athlete's born sex) pervasive. Of course you heard of these incidents. They're newsworthy and people are interested in talking about the topic. But if you look at the grand scheme of all sport in America, the occurrence is overwhelmingly rare.How in the hell, with a straight face, can you say it hardly ever happens?
It's a new social ill, it's gaining momentum, and insinuating that it's complicated implies we should ponder something that's really cut and dried.
Until it isn’t.Because it's true. Just because you heard of this incident and perhaps a few others doesn't mean it's ("it" being trans athletes competing in sports against the sex opposite the athlete's born sex) pervasive. Of course you heard of these incidents. They're newsworthy and people are interested in talking about the topic. But if you look at the grand scheme of all sport in America, the occurrence is overwhelmingly rare.
But if you look at the grand scheme of all sport in America, the occurrence is overwhelmingly rare.
It's a good thing the first post I replied to was in the present tense, not the future.Until it isn’t.
What a doofus.
It's a good thing the first post I replied to was in the present tense, not the future.
Like Proderpaderp, @sshat believes he is virtuous and intelligent, dangerous combination.It's almost like you're proud of the fact that your "point" is pointless.
lmao
I mean, if you're looking at a single competition in a vacuum...Overwhelmingly rare until you are in the competition that has the boy-girl in it and he is beating the out of all the other girl-girls.
If my point is pointless, so is the post on page one I replied to.It's almost like you're proud of the fact that your "point" is pointless.
lmao
If my point is pointless, so is the post on page one I replied to.
I mean, if you're looking at a single competition in a vacuum...
If you're not, then you'd agree that it is exceedingly rare at the moment. To say it's not rare is pretty unsubstantiated.We're not, but you're trying like hell to make it seem like that!
"Oversimplified,".....lmao!
Like Proderpaderp, @sshat believes he is virtuous and intelligent, dangerous combination.
If you're not, then you'd agree that it is exceedingly rare at the moment. To say it's not rare is pretty unsubstantiated.
I have not posited any position about what the future holds in this thread, but you're acting like I have.All bad ideas start out as rare occurrences.
You have a keen grasp of the obvious.
Whose decision do you think that should be? NCAA? Or should it be law?Since it is rare and will only affect a few why not "nip it in the bud" and we will not have to worry about it becoming anything but rare and that will only be mentioned in history.
I have not posited any position about what the future holds in this thread, but you're acting like I have.
Whose decision do you think that should be? NCAA? Or should it be law?