Fix was on the U20 World Team when Rocco was in 5th grade (6th if held back in jh)13 out of 20 finalists won a medal at age level world championships:
133- Daton Fix- 2021 Senior 2nd, 2018 U20 3rd, 2017 U20 1st, 2016 U20 3rd, 2015 U17 3rd
Thank you very much it's much appreciated.Team Scores
1 Penn State 148.0
2 Michigan 64.5
3 Iowa 60.0
4 Arizona State 59.5
4 Iowa State 59.5
6 Cornell 58.5
7 Nebraska 57.5
8 Ohio State 57.0
9 Oklahoma State 55.0
10 Virginia Tech 53.0
11 NC State 48.5
12 South Dakota State 43.0
13 Missouri 40.0
14 Northern Iowa 34.5
15 Lehigh 31.0
I had 2 on my teamBiggest surprises to me not to AA:
Ramos
Davis
Latona
Spratley?
Ramirez
PINTO
HAMITI
BASTIDA
Last 3 tops on my list, followed closely by Ramos.
Kasak upsets 1 seed Lovett by MDFor those of you who are on the GOAT alert, PSU is at 148 now, 22 short of Iowa's 1997 score of 170 (or 23.5 short of MP's new math that takes into account scoring changes). Kasak and Truax will be going this morning. They earn 3.5 pts each w/ a win next round in the conso finals. They can add 1, 1.5 or 2 w/ bonus pts. Then in their final match (3rd/4th or 5th/6th) they add 1 pt plus bonus. So these 2 will add somewhere between 0-18 pts combined. Going off of seeds, Kasak and Truax will be the underdogs in all of their matches. Now we all know that seeds don't mean much but this gives you some perspective. The finals is a little different where PSU is a favorite (per seeds) in 3 of their 6 matches. And I would say Starocci is a favorite as well. Messenbrink is seeded as a fav but Carr could win this one. The other finals match is Mendez vs Bartlett. Obviously Mendez is the higher seed but they have split this year, so it's really a tossup. These matches are worth 4 pts each and bonus pts could add more, but those pts are harder to get at this level, but still very possible. So the whole GOAT thing comes down to a few key matches and a few bonus pts. I'll do an update after the next round if I remember .
Truax loses by fall.Kasak upsets 1 seed Lovett by MD
PSU = 152.5
I had it 153 but scoreboard shows 152.5.
I missed this. What was the formula, and besides the three-point takedown, what are the scoring differences from '97 to the current format?For those of you who are on the GOAT alert, PSU is at 148 now, 22 short of Iowa's 1997 score of 170 (or 23.5 short of MP's new math that takes into account scoring changes).
From MPI missed this. What was the formula, and besides the three-point takedown, what are the scoring differences from '97 to the current format?
Thanks bdhof. Wouldn’t you also have to go back and award 3 points for every takedown Iowa and their opponents scored in a match and adjust final match scores? I’m guessing this would have resulted in more bonus point wins for Iowa.From MP
Copied from a friend on another bbs.
Scoring 1997 v 2024
There are differences between then and now in all three elements of team scoring.
Bonus - In 1997 they distinguished between a tech fall without back points (called a match termination) and one with back points (called a tech fall). A match termination was worth 1 team point, while a tech fall was worth 1.5 team points. Today they are all worth 1.5 team points. So, we need to adjust Iowa’s total by adding a half point to any match terminations (foreshadowing – this will get tricky).
Advancement – In 1997 the tournament was scored as a 64-man bracket whenever there was a pig tail. Not every weight had pigtails though. Today it is always scored as a 32-man bracket with a pigtail. So, what is the difference? In a 64-man bracket everyone who wins a first round match in the championship (or consolation) bracket gets an extra point (or half point). For example, in a 64-man bracket the winner gets 5 advancement points instead of the current 4 points.
Placement - Placement points for third through eighth place were also different in 1997. We will also need to adjust Iowa’s total for these differences.
Putting It All Together
The 1997 Iowa team loses the extra 4.5 advancement points available in their 64-man brackets at 142, 158, 177, 190, and 275. But they get an extra bonus point at 150 as Lincoln McIlravy’s 1-point match terminations become 1.5-point tech falls. They also pick up an extra 5 placement points for their sixth and fifth place finishes.
Adding it all up and 1997 Iowa now has 171.5 points.
That is the real point record PSU needs to shoot for.
Won't be doing that.Thanks bdhof. Wouldn’t you also have to go back and award 3 points for every takedown Iowa and their opponents scored in a match and adjust final match scores? I’m guessing this would have resulted in more bonus point wins for Iowa.
That's the last time I pick a guy named after a bean.......Biggest surprises to me not to AA:
Ramos
Davis
Latona
Spratley?
Ramirez
PINTO
HAMITI
BASTIDA
Last 3 tops on my list, followed closely by Ramos.
And Kasak w/ a mild upset over Waters WVTruax upsets (mild upset) Salazr MINN by MD.
PSU 154.5
Other records on the betting lineAnd Kasak w/ a mild upset over Waters WV
PSU 155.5
That's it for PSU until tonight. They need 4 champs (4 pts each match) + a bonus pt to set a new record (over new math). I count 3 w/o blinking - Starocci, Brooks and Kerk. And I'd put Haines in the probable category, and Bartlett & Messenbrink in the tossup category.
Iowa had 5 champions in 1986 and 1997.Other records on the betting line
Greatest margin of victory 70
2005 Oklahoma State John Smith 153 Michigan 83 St. Louis
Most NCAA champs (not sure what year)
IOWA 5