Well only he really knows what he meant but if the propaganda being pushed is that it was a veiled threat, I am offering a logic based and common sense explanation for what he said that makes 1000 times more sense. Further, if you just use his actual words, they were not confusing in the slightest. It was in a presser for combatting violence. It is in the context of discussing what the 2nd amendment allows and it’s limitations. He said the 2nd amendment would need to allow for weaponry equal to that of the government and gave examples. At no point was there a conversation about insurrections or dropping bombs or any of the rubbish that is being spewed.
Usually if you just use common sense and logic, things will become crystal clear. Stop allowing your allow your mind to be corrupted.