History says yes as we have yet to score on them ever… being out scored 76-0 in the most recent meetings in 2016 and 17this region has almost no intriguing matchups outside of Indian Hill vs Milton Union
Valley View could give Waverly a game
That's a very good team. They could do damage.Whoever plays VV in the first round will be pissed. Worst first round match up you can get..
Don't think your 2nd rd matchups are correct there. Or are they not following a normal bracket setup?Deeper dive now that the seedlings are set:
Round 1
Wyoming over Waynesville
Eaton over Oakwood
Mcnick over Washington
Massie over Northridge
Valley View over Waverly (upset)
Bethel Tate over Shroder
Indian Hill over Milton Union
Taylor over Graham Local
Round 2
Wyoming v Valley View
Eaton v Indian Hill
McNick v Taylor
Massie v Bethel Tate
Wyoming 1 v Valley View 12Don't think your 2nd rd matchups are correct there. Or are they not following a normal bracket setup?
Not writing them off by any means. I know zero about MU but have seen IH. They have a lot of potential firepower. There are bound to be a few R1 ”upsets”I wouldn’t write off Milton Union just yet Playing at home will help their cause
is their qb out for the year?Have seen IH play a few times in CHL play. Hard team to figure out. Definitely a dangerous match-up, but never really sure which team shows up.
false. it’s a set bracket. Massie would play valley view, eaton vs indian hill, wyoming vs taylor, bethel tate vs mcnickWyoming 1 v Valley View 12
Eaton 2 v Indian Hill 10
Mcnick 3 v Taylor 9
Massie 4 v Bethel Tate 6
Of course R2 is speculative but I think this is correct. Let me know if I’m wrong.
Ok didn’t know that, guess I don’t know what a set bracket is.false. it’s a set bracket. Massie would play valley view, eaton vs indian hill, wyoming vs taylor, bethel tate vs mcnick
essentially the winner of 1vs16 plays the winner of 8vs9, 2v15 winner plays 7v10, and so onOk didn’t know that, guess I don’t know what a set bracket is.
But isn’t it “reset” after R1 going forward with the higher seed playing the lowest seed, next highest seed the next lowest seed, etc? That’s what I did in Post #44 those are round 2 game predictions.essentially the winner of 1vs16 plays the winner of 8vs9, 2v15 winner plays 7v10, and so on
No, it's like the NCAA Basketball TourneyBut isn’t it “reset” after R1 going forward with the higher seed playing the lowest seed, next highest seed the next lowest seed, etc? That’s what I did in Post #44 those are round 2 game predictions.
That’s cool. If things work out like I predicted it would be fun to play a Clermont Co. team in R2.No, it's like the NCAA Basketball Tourney
Then my advice is not to make predictions about teams you know nothing about. If indian Hill thinks they will roll over this Bulldog team then that's even better. MU has a couple of athletes too.Not writing them off by any means. I know zero about MU but have seen IH. They have a lot of potential firepower. There are bound to be a few R1 ”upsets”
This is a very dangerous Valley View team. We beat them but it was nip and tuck the whole game.In the NCAA tourney the most common upset is a 12 over a 5 I sure that is not the case here. Having played Valley View in the past in the post season I hope we have finally got over the hump of just happy to make it to week 11 and now have the expectations to win in week 11