Global Warming

Again you misunderstand what WUWT does well. It's a conduit for skeptical climate science that is not getting heard in the MSM. The articles on that site are scientifically sound.

Your comparison of skeptical climate science to what was done to defend tobacco is slanderous. The evidence that smoking hurts peoples health was overwhelming and of high quality. The science supporting that humans are dangerously changing global climate by releasing CO2 is weak and can be countered by stronger evidence that it is not.
Who pays for WUWT?
 
Oh for crying out loud - Direct extermination and habitat loss is to blame for almost all recent animal extinctions and for those animals on the brink of going extinct. To blame this on global warming is to deflect attention from the real causes - deforestation/habitat destruction and directly killing the animals.

If your family goats were the most precious things you owned and it was all that stood between your family and starvation you would shoot & poison every snow leopard you could find.

If you want to save these animals:

* raise the standard of living around the world.

* create an economic incentive for the locals not to destroy the habitat and kill the wildlife

* provide cheap abundant energy (coal) to the locals so they don't have to cut down every tree and bush to provide cooking fires and heat.

Focusing on preventing global warming won't help nature at all. And the extent it takes our eyes off the real things we can do to protect the environment it damages the cause.
 
1622729123487.png
 


No one is denying the climate is changing, nor that it has changed for millions of years ...........long before humankind.

Most of us are just smart enough to know that humans have no tangible impact on climate change and it is pure folly to think otherwise.

Lastly, embracing Marxism as the (false) answer to a non-problem is about the most absurd notion we have ever heard. Stop the insanity, please.
 
Top