???Running Clock!
Winton Woods might win, man, but I highly doubt they’ll drop a running clock on La Salle.Running Clock!
They will get things fixed. New coaches, new system it’s a work in progress.Winton Woods offense is terrible. If they keep the their defense on the field all night it will get ugly.
The elements also steady rain down pour, Cramping etc.If WW does not make a lot of mistakes LaSalle wins by 14 27-13. If they play like they did at Trotwood it may not even be that close.
Now WW did shutout Trotwood 18-0 but WW reported only 91 yards of total offence (23 yards rushing) and 2 TD.
Definitely interested in this one. Likely the R8 winner comes from these two.
The elements also study rain down pour.
Teams will key on Spikes & force the supporting cast to beat them. Unfortunately for WW this week Lasalle will play juniors ,and seniors opposed to Trotwood who played sophomores and juniors. I see WW defense created short fields for the offense. The defensive line is fun to watch and they have depth. Watching Lasalle I believe WW will key Payne and force the others to beat them. Warriors have to watch out for the little slot Garrett as well. Special teams will be huge too in a low scoring affair.The WW coaches cant be pleased with 90 yards of total offence (23 rushing). I don't care if its raining, snowing, too hot or too cold... 23 yards rushing is sad vs. a Trotwood team that will be lucky to go 6-4...
I am guessing looking at the schedule Trotwood is a 5-5 team and I doubt Trotwood shows up to LaSalle in week 9 for that whooping. (I see a covid quarantine) ...
Last time they played LaSalle held spikes to 37 total yards on 8 touches. (WW only had 100 for the game)Teams will key on Spikes & force the supporting cast to beat them. Unfortunately for WW this week Lasalle will play juniors ,and seniors opposed to Trotwood who played sophomores and juniors. I see WW defense created short fields for the offense. The defensive line is fun to watch and they have depth. Watching Lasalle I believe WW will key Payne and force the others to beat them. Warriors have to watch out for the little slot Garrett as well. Special teams will be huge too in a low scoring affair.
WW was 1-8 on 3rd down conversions vs Trotwood. We will have to improve on this in order to keep the defense fresh. Heard Payne didn't play the 4th quarter but tht doesn't matter they beat us without him last yr. Not only did they win they beat us pretty convincingly.Last time they played LaSalle held spikes to 37 total yards on 8 touches. (WW only had 100 for the game)
LaSalle rolled up over 380 yards of offence (270 rushing) but third down was where WW Stumbled (on offence and defense) as Lasalle converted 8 of 11 while holding WW to 1 third down conversion.
WW D fly's to the ball and will get their share of TFLs. They have to create turnovers and stop LaSalle on 3rd down to have a chance.
Wow. You must not know the pedigree of Trotwood kids and coaching staffs. They not scared of anybody, including LaSalle. Whether they win or take a butt kicking they will be there to play.The WW coaches cant be pleased with 90 yards of total offence (23 rushing). I don't care if its raining, snowing, too hot or too cold... 23 yards rushing is sad vs. a Trotwood team that will be lucky to go 6-4...
I am guessing looking at the schedule Trotwood is a 5-5 team and I doubt Trotwood shows up to LaSalle in week 9 for that whooping. (I see a covid quarantine) ...
Last year's game was 35-10. Zach Branam gained 319 yards last year (107p, 212r). There is no Zach Branam this year.WW was 1-8 on 3rd down conversions vs Trotwood. We will have to improve on this in order to keep the defense fresh. Heard Payne didn't play the 4th quarter but tht doesn't matter they beat us without him last yr. Not only did they win they beat us pretty convincingly.
Last year's game was 35-10. Zach Branam gained 319 yards last year (107p, 212r). There is no Zach Branam this year.
I don't believe the new DC will allow the quarterback to pull a Branam on us. However if the offense can't muster up anything, it can be a long day. Watching Lasalle on film there are some holes in tht defense. I think we have the experience outside to cause some match up problems in that secondary tht didn't look aggressive vs Colerain in the run game, so I would throw some quick screens out there to make em make plays.Last year's game was 35-10. Zach Branam gained 319 yards last year (107p, 212r). There is no Zach Branam this year.
We will see...Wow. You must not know the pedigree of Trotwood kids and coaching staffs. They not scared of anybody, including LaSalle. Whether they win or take a butt kicking they will be there to play.
On another note. Winton Woods offensively was as bad as Trotwood looked on offense. 90 total yards is not saying much at all. And heck the two touchdowns they scored were set-up by horrible field position gaffs by Trotwood. Fumble snaps I believe. Trotwood's D was good, fast and team tackled. The offense is yet to be desired because they are extremely young. I believe there are 8 Sophomores starting on offense and 16 or 17 of the 22 starting are sophomores. Young.
The WW offense looked uncomfortable and out of sorts. Likely because the system is new. But I think they have the talent once it grows into the system to be good. Still early.