And ILLEGALLY resisting arrestShe knew she wasn't going to miss the cop, there wasn't enough room so she hit him to escape, after ILLEGALLY ignoring several orders while detained as a criminal suspect .....sound legal to you? lol
And ILLEGALLY resisting arrestShe knew she wasn't going to miss the cop, there wasn't enough room so she hit him to escape, after ILLEGALLY ignoring several orders while detained as a criminal suspect .....sound legal to you? lol
George"porn star" Floyd was on the "turn around too, just ask his family. Someone slipped him the counterfeit bill by accident and he thought the 4 different illegal drugs in his body was candy . Seems like none of them "did nuffin" but they star on the news EVERY night like they're 90% of the populace . Unbelievable.Like I said once already, too bad her children will never see her turn her life around, but otherwise.......
She knew she was going to hit him, you think it mattered in her escape plan after refusing to comply with a dozen orders? Thats like saying " I fired a bullet at the cop thinking I would miss by a hair and just scare him until I escaped , oops im sorry it hit him" Actually in the latest video it looks like she straigtened out the wheel after turning it .initially.So she did attempt to miss him by turning her steering wheel all the way in one direction away from him?
Now you know what she knew? lolShe knew she was going to hit him, you think it mattered in her escape plan after refusing to comply with a dozen orders? Thats like saying " I fired a bullet at the cop thinking I would miss by a hair and just scare him until I escaped , oops im sorry it hit him" Actually in the latest video it looks like she straigtened out the wheel after turning it .initially.
You think it was possible to miss him considering the distance he was away, then she accelerated?? Pay attention to point#2....." She fired her gun trying to barely miss the officer trying to detain her for criminal suspicion and scare him while she escaped .....oops it hit him!" Doesn't matter the officer has every right to fire back, whether the bullet misses or not. Think about that.Now you know what she knew? lol
You ok over their Garden ? Were you related to the pregnant booze thieves or something? You're getting worked up. SMASHHHHH!!!!Yea, Think about that! I dare ya
I am not arguing if he had the right to shoot or not. I don't think she was attempting to kill him. Otherwise she would not have attempted to miss him. And again, he was really dumb to stand in front of a car of a suspected petty thief.You think it was possible to miss him considering the distance he was away, then she accelerated?? Pay attention to point#2....." She fired her gun trying to barely miss the officer trying to detain her for criminal suspicion and scare him while she escaped .....oops it hit him!" Doesn't matter the officer has every right to fire back, whether the bullet misses or not. Think about that.
She can't hurt you anymore. She's dead. Now swish that tapioca.You ok over their Garden ? Were you related to the pregnant booze thieves or something? You're getting worked up. SMASHHHHH!!!!
........... And again, he was really dumb to stand in front of a car of a suspected petty thief.
You think he knew her entire police record at that point? That was the best angle to protect his partner watching her closely. Furthermore since she was only a suspected "petty thief" did he have reason to believe she would run him over to escape? I can find flaws in your opinion and so will the defense. He had every right to shoot her once she "accelerated" the vehicle as a weapon to escape, thats all that will matter.I am not arguing if he had the right to shoot or not. I don't think she was attempting to kill him. Otherwise she would not have attempted to miss him. And again, he was really dumb to stand in front of a car of a suspected petty thief.
Here it is, Post #11. The one that triggered the sensitive posters.SMH at police officers who put themselves in danger by doing things like......................standing in front of cars.
Police in Ohio fatally shot a pregnant shoplifting suspect
BLENDON, Ohio (AP) — Police in a Columbus suburb fatally shot a pregnant woman in an Ohio supermarket parking lot after she accelerated her car toward an officer, police officials said.www.wfmj.com
You are making an argument I am not making. And, anything can happen in court.You think he knew her entire police record at that point? That was the best angle to protect his partner watching her closely. Furthermore since she was only a suspected "petty thief" did he have reason to believe she would run him over to escape? I can find flaws in your opinion and so will the defense. He had every right to shoot her once she "accelerated" the vehicle as a weapon to escape, thats all that will matter.
Yours is not the legal standard for detaining to investigate. His is.Who put those two big words together for you?
What are the next two big words? Clue.......the first has 8 letters, the second has 5.
Didn't say it was. Thanks though.Not the legal standard for detaining to investigate.
Tried to help him get to PC then ARREST so that he could babble more about ILLEGALLY RESISTING ARREST. Since you seem to be aware of some legal standard or whatnot, did you think that she resist arrest/at what point?Yours is not the legal standard for detaining to investigate. His is.
It happened, so sure.Does the fact that she indeed stole from the store enter the equation at any point?
As she was not under arrest, no. Was she guilty of Fleeing and Eluding, absolutely yes.It happened, so sure.
In your opinion Did She Resist Arrest, and if so........When?
Not sure what you're looking for. She was not free to leave, period. In spite of the officer being really stupid tactically by standing in front of the car, she committed an additional crime by driving the car toward him.Oh no, now preparing for a babbling assault on the elements of the Fleeing and Eluding statute/s.
I was not referring to you at all when i referenced a "babbling assault"...Not sure what you're looking for. She was not free to leave, period. In spite of the officer being really stupid tactically by standing in front of the car, she committed an additional crime by driving the car toward him.
You are not permitted to flee over the top of a police officer’s body. Making the moves towards accomplishing that is where she becomes a felon.As she was not under arrest, no. Was she guilty of Fleeing and Eluding, absolutely yes.
"The basic offense of fleeing or eluding is considered a first-degree misdemeanor in Ohio, although fleeing or eluding also can be a felony under some circumstances. If you're convicted of misdemeanor fleeing or eluding, you may face penalties such as: Up to 180 days in jail. Up to a $1,000 fine."
Lol. No they shouldn’t. All crimes are not equal. Complete nonsense to say they should use any means necessary. Just shoot every suspect then.Resisting arrest is illegal, for good reason. To protect the public is reason #1. A police officer should be able to use ANY means possible to arrest a suspect/criminal. You simply can NOT have a law abiding society otherwise which for obvious reasons is unacceptable to the majority who obey the law and pay taxes to uphold it. We can't have criminals/suspects just say "sorry officer you're not arresting me today" Who in the **** thinks that is a good idea? I'll tell you who CRIMINALS thats it!
Its illegal to resist go ahead tell me otherwise??? So i can physically detain you and if i feel threatened you may take my gun or harm me you get shot Legally! End if story go home .Lol. No they shouldn’t. All crimes are not equal. Complete nonsense to say they should use any means necessary. Just shoot every suspect then.
DeflectingYou are making an argument I am not making. And, anything can happen in court.
NopeDeflecting