oncearunner
Member
Milesplit is fun, but I am curious about everyone's observations about the trend in XC courses in Ohio since sites like Milesplit began ranking and sorting runners, and then basing their features on the athletes at the top of the list. It seems as though XC courses traditionally were built to be challenging, and course designers were proud to roll out courses that would tax runners in a way that a track cannot. Teams would flock to meets that were tough, in hopes that it would harden the team for future championship races. Of course I'm generalizing....
But what I see now is course designers purposely building courses to be fast. Sometimes artificially fast - with the grass mowed tight and low, sometimes rolled hard, no hills or sharp turns, and occasionally measured in creative ways. Meets like Centerville (terrifically flat and fast, several sections on the track), Midwest Meet of Champions (Hilliard - site of Kreft's 14:36), and on and on are great meets, but they seem to be set up to produce "Milesplit worthy" times. Teams seek out these courses so runners - in pursuit of Milesplit glory - can post a good time (versus beating someone in a competition), and teams can rise in Milesplit rankings, win the virtual meets, and get pub. Of course I'm generalizing...
Do you all see the same? I lament XC turning into a series of time trials - a sport in which times trump racing. Too often I see kids checking their watches as they cross the line, as opposed to digging deep to beat someone a few steps ahead. Bums me out. Of course I'm generalizing...
But what I see now is course designers purposely building courses to be fast. Sometimes artificially fast - with the grass mowed tight and low, sometimes rolled hard, no hills or sharp turns, and occasionally measured in creative ways. Meets like Centerville (terrifically flat and fast, several sections on the track), Midwest Meet of Champions (Hilliard - site of Kreft's 14:36), and on and on are great meets, but they seem to be set up to produce "Milesplit worthy" times. Teams seek out these courses so runners - in pursuit of Milesplit glory - can post a good time (versus beating someone in a competition), and teams can rise in Milesplit rankings, win the virtual meets, and get pub. Of course I'm generalizing...
Do you all see the same? I lament XC turning into a series of time trials - a sport in which times trump racing. Too often I see kids checking their watches as they cross the line, as opposed to digging deep to beat someone a few steps ahead. Bums me out. Of course I'm generalizing...