Don't forget to look at the GWOC stats page too.
It will take quite a bit for X to get overwhelmed by anyone. They didn't get overwhelmed by Brownsburg with a D1 qb and two d1 receivers, nor Cathedral with a bigger line and speed in the backfield and on the edges. I appreciate your enthusiasm and love for your team ORB, but if we want to compare strength of schedule and compare competition, that's not going to be a good look for you.
Have a fun time in Florida, and good luck to both teams tomorrow. Even us proud Democrats don't want someone to have a bad time on vacation.
Looking at your prior game analysis-- for both teams (which is more in-depth and detailed than I am capable of), I kind of think this game will actually come down to execution-- not talent/athleticism-- by that, I mean that X will need to execute well in two areas:
1) Running what is maybe the most complex offense in the state-- the line will need to continue to pass-block well, the QB will need to run through his reads well, and the secondary and tertiary receivers will need to CATCH THE BALL, when it's thrown to them (something they didn't do well last week);
2) The defensive front 6 staying disciplined about keeping containment on Smoot, so that, when plays break down (as they inevitably will), Smoot is not able to do more damage running the ball than throwing it...
...and then the outcome will depend on whether Springfield can respond in kind:
1) Can Springfield's defense be as disciplined as Lakota West was, in their pass coverage assignments-- it is NOT enough against X, to simply be athletic-- you also have to be smart and disciplined, on every play; we saw that, as good as LW was at this, the one mistake that the LW safety made, late in the game, was enough to result in Clifford getting open for the game-winning play... does Springfield have what it takes to combine superior athleticism with superior scheme and execution? The secondary concern for Springfield (if they really did have problems with Whitmer's line) is whether they will be able to contain X in the run game-- the Whitmer game suggests this is an open question.
2) Can Springfield exploit X's biggest weakness-- the defensive secondary's coverage of long passes? If Smoot is not accurate with his throws, or the receivers are not precise with their routes and/or do not catch the "catchable balls" on long passes, then it seems likely that Springfield will have a tough time scoring enough to keep up with an X offense that is very capable of putting up 30-40 points in this game. The secondary concern for Springfield will be Smoot's decision-making: will he know when to not throw into tight coverage, pull it down, and try to make something happen with his feet-- if so, he could make it a long night for the X defense-- if not, it could be a long night for him. Braxton Miller was fabulous at this-- but he was also a transcendent player-- the type that doesn't come along but maybe once every ~10 years or so; it's asking a lot to ask Smoot to be Braxton Miller-like-- but maybe he IS that good...?