Seems to me that the case against the "armorer"...the person who is in charge of handing out safe guns...is a better case than against Baldwin. BUT...
Who hired the armorer? Who hired the person who hired the armorer? Does it all lead neatly back to Baldwin? Reminds of the famous Paul Brown story...bus driver taking the Browns to the stadium in an away city...gets lost...can't find the stadium. PB sitting up front..."you must want to have me fired, Mr. Brown." Brown..."No, I want to fire the person who hired you".
Who hired the armorer? Who hired the person who hired the armorer? Does it all lead neatly back to Baldwin? Reminds of the famous Paul Brown story...bus driver taking the Browns to the stadium in an away city...gets lost...can't find the stadium. PB sitting up front..."you must want to have me fired, Mr. Brown." Brown..."No, I want to fire the person who hired you".