Alleged doesn't mean not real.Those alleged injuries were real one getting x-rays the others
Alleged doesn't mean not real.Those alleged injuries were real one getting x-rays the others
Lol. Sure thing old man.Alleged doesn't mean not true sit back enjoy our 6 straight WBL title
Sure a keyboard warrior there sonLol. Sure thing old man.
You're incoherent.Sure a keyboard warrior there son
Yhea but i continually get you to amuse me monkey boyYou're incoherent.
Hey bro. 43% completion %, same TD and INT as your team, and 8 more YPG. 2nd in the WBL. Don't make dumb claims nowThose alleged injuries were real one getting x-rays the others
no pass defense
These are discussion forums. The entire purpose is to post and reply.Yhea but i continually get you to amuse me monkey boy
The Wapak game could be closer than some think injuries to some key players
Hey bro. 43% completion %, same TD and INT as your team, and 8 more YPG. 2nd in the WBL. Don't make dumb claims now
Yhea on paper it looks real good but you go back to a lot of points that has been scored on Wapak is late in the 4th quarter when we have in our reserves and I think riders have a good defense but there Achilles right now is the pass gameHey bro. 43% completion %, same TD and INT as your team, and 8 more YPG. 2nd in the WBL. Don't make dumb claims now
Hey bro. 43% completion %, same TD and INT as your team, and 8 more YPG. 2nd in the WBL. Don't make dumb claims now
I'm very pessimistic about Wapak and never overlook any team. We have several starters they have had X-rays and mri the last week so Yhea I don't get to cocky and expect a blown out every week. This is a great group of kids this year and I hope they all get the chance to compete as long as they canThese are discussion forums. The entire purpose is to post and reply.
To my original post, I said that the alleged Wapak injures had no effect on the game. In the lead up to the games this week, you mentioned different injuries that Wapak was working through. In the WBL Predictions Week 8 thread, you said this:
You weren't the only one who mentioned Wapak injuries. WBLGuy did too, but there wasn't really any real identification in that thread of what the injuries were, the extent of them, who all was impacted, etc. My postgame comment was simply saying that Wapak rolled to a running clock regardless. It was perhaps poor word choice on my end to say the injuries had "no effect," but I wasn't saying those injuries weren't real. That's not what alleged means. I was saying the apparent injuries y'all were discussing didn't seem to factor into the game as heavily as some folks thought they might. The Wapak offense was still precise, explosive, and dominant while their defense did exactly what you'd expect to the worst offense in the WBL; they shut them out. Wapak is at the top of the league standings and Elida is at the bottom. This game went exactly the way most expected it to. That's really all I was saying before you decided to get your panties in a bunch.
Concussions are a bitch plus you tore a quad typing thatWhat the hell does "Yhea" mean?
Did you see him doing jumping jacks while typing it or whatConcussions are a bitch plus you tore a quad typing that
The only “real” passing attack in the WBL is surprisingly the one dialed up by the Skin’s, in which you saw your precious riders get picked apart. Kenton isn’t the Kenton of old, bath is okay but i see them as fools gold, and everyone else only throws when they absolutely must. Wapak throws it because they CAN. When you see a high powered pass offense in the playoffs you will see the same result as the Wapak game.Hey bro. 43% completion %, same TD and INT as your team, and 8 more YPG. 2nd in the WBL. Don't make dumb claims now
He goes by Nash makes me think of the pro wrestler Kevin Nash who used to tear a quad sneezingDid you see him doing jumping jacks while typing it or what
Didn't happen against Perkins last year. Their vaunted pass offense didn't get off the ground for very much and that Riders team started 0-4. But hey, Riders had a few coverage busts against "the only real pass attack in the WBL". I could make some equally dumb remark like "You guys can't stop an inside run, and when you run into a real bruising back with enough of a Pass O to mean anything you're going to get destroyed".The only “real” passing attack in the WBL is surprisingly the one dialed up by the Skin’s, in which you saw your precious riders get picked apart. Kenton isn’t the Kenton of old, bath is okay but i see them as fools gold, and everyone else only throws when they absolutely must. Wapak throws it because they CAN. When you see a high powered pass offense in the playoffs you will see the same result as the Wapak game.
Wait, didn’t St. Marys lose to Perkins last year?Didn't happen against Perkins last year. Their vaunted pass offense didn't get off the ground for very much and that Riders team started 0-4. But hey, Riders had a few coverage busts against "the only real pass attack in the WBL". I could make some equally dumb remark like "You guys can't stop an inside run, and when you run into a real bruising back with enough of a Pass O to mean anything you're going to get destroyed".
Yes, but their defense did well against Perkins. Multiple turnovers were the difference there.Wait, didn’t St. Marys lose to Perkins last year?
Perkins went 14-18 for 200 yards and 3 touchdowns, all three touchdowns being more than 15 yard passes. 2 of their incompletions were interceptions, but even still giving that many long TD passes up is not coverage busts, it’s simply bad coverage.Didn't happen against Perkins last year. Their vaunted pass offense didn't get off the ground for very much and that Riders team started 0-4. But hey, Riders had a few coverage busts against "the only real pass attack in the WBL". I could make some equally dumb remark like "You guys can't stop an inside run, and when you run into a real bruising back with enough of a Pass O to mean anything you're going to get destroyed".
2 INT is enough to win the gamePerkins went 14-18 for 200 yards and 3 touchdowns, all three touchdowns being more than 15 yard passes. 2 of their incompletions were interceptions, but even still giving that many long TD passes up is not coverage busts, it’s simply bad coverage.
Celina according to F50 is kind of a bad 1st round draw with some teams considered numerically to be much weaker sandwiched above and below Celina in projected seeding. That said, Wapak is still Wapak.As we're entering Week 9, the playoff picture is starting to come into focus. I'm just going off of the Fantastic 50 predictions, so this is all in good fun and speculation, but it looks like 7 WBL teams will be in playoff contention.
Defiance projected as #6 seed (6-4) in D3 R10, most likely first round opponent is Midview
Wapak projected as #2 seed (10-0) in D3 R12, most likely first round opponent is Celina
St Marys projected as #8 seed (8-2) in D3 R12, most likely first round opponent is Miami Trace
Celina projected as #15 seed (5-5) in D3 R12, most likely first round opponent is Wapak
Ottawa-Glandorf projected as #11 seed (5-5) in D4 R14, most likely first round opponent is Clyde
Van Wert projected as #16 seed (4-6) in D4 R14, most likely first round opponent is Perkins
Bath projected as #9 seed (5-5) in D5 R20, most likely first round opponent is Miami East
Kenton (3-7), Elida (2-8), and Shawnee (2-8) are projected OUT of the playoffs. Interestingly though, the week 10 Elida @ Van Wert game could essentially be a play-in game. F50 right now has VW winning that and earning the #16 seed. If Elida were to win, F50 has them as likely in as the #15 seed and thus pushing VW out.
Except they lost2 INT is enough to win the game
I think the league as a whole is up this year. I'd say Bath could win R20, Wapak is right behind London for R12, and Defiance isn't a slouch either. That's where I'm at right nowAlso, I still can’t really tell if the league has been super tough this year with how back and forth it’s been or if every team really is just average or below average outside of Wapak. It’ll be interesting to see how we all do in playoffs compared to last year