I enjoy wrestling
Well-known member
Look into the California House results. Only 50% +/- of the vote is counted for some races. What's happening is an abomination. It undermines Election integrity. This is a joke.
Therefore whatever side loses while using this process is going to scream foul play no matter the facts of cheating or not.
There are several still being long-counted that will likely swing 'Pubs way in the House, notably California 10, California 45, New York 22, Oregon 5, and Texas 16. We can revisit in a few days to see if the Commies stole these too, no? Lol."Whatever side loses?"
When has the Democrat ever lost one of these long counts?
I'll wait...
well November isn't over, they still have half the month to vote don't they?Look into the California House results. Only 50% +/- of the vote is counted for some races. What's happening is an abomination. It undermines Election integrity. This is a joke.
Understood.. If the Dems ever come out on the losing end they would call foul in a race they lose in the 10 day of “counting”"Whatever side loses?"
When has the Democrat ever lost one of these long counts?
I'll wait...
There are several still being long-counted that will likely swing 'Pubs way in the House, notably California 10, California 45, New York 22, Oregon 5, and Texas 16. We can revisit in a few days to see if the Commies stole these too, no? Lol.
Understood.. If the Dems ever come out on the losing end they would call foul in a race they lose in the 10 day of “counting”
I didn’t specifically assign the word “Commies” to you. Considering the amount of times it’s used in this forum to refer to folks on my side of the aisle, I thought it was apropos."Commies?" I did not use that word so don't attempt to assign it to me. I understand without your fabrications and false narratives you're an unarmed man, but have some self-respect. Sheesh...
Nah. It’s happened in House races like this in the past. You likely just pay attention to the high profile candidates that whine about the results.I have little faith in any of those long count races, but we'll see. It could be the math retards finally overextended.
Well, I mean, does Dubya ring any bells for ya? Lol.Looking back, anywhere past 2022, can you point to a Republican that won a long count? Yeah, I didn't think so.
Hanging chads, pregnant chads Bush/Gore."Whatever side loses?"
When has the Democrat ever lost one of these long counts?
I'll wait...
Our lefty goons are always a few years behind European lefty goons, and we’re always reactionaryOther Countries understand mail in voting allows cheating.
Voting Fraud Is a Real Concern. Just Look Around the World
If concern about voter fraud with mail-in ballots is delusional, it is a delusion that is shared by most of the world.www.newsweek.com
I didn’t specifically assign the word “Commies” to you. Considering the amount of times it’s used in this forum to refer to folks on my side of the aisle, I thought it was apropos.
Nah. It’s happened in House races like this in the past. You likely just pay attention to the high profile candidates that whine about the results.
Well, I mean, does Dubya ring any bells for ya? Lol.
A house is full of smoke. No worries, there is no fire.They drag this out into absurdity and then wonder where conspiracy theories come from...
Rigged!One week later and Election day results aren't known. Who supports this? These States are failures.
The election season some states are having and the days/weeks of counting, gives a bad appearance. More importantly, it gives some time and fuel for the conspiracy theorists to start spinning webs.Only Republicans think there is cheating.
Sure thing. Here's one for you. California 49 was called for Darrell Issa (R) on November 28th, 2016. So let's count together. That's 20 days after election day.Name one.
You figure it out.Rigged!
Stolen!
Spot on and many other Countries know this. Plus, plenty of data correlation to link mail in voting to fraud. Fact!The election season some states are having and the days/weeks of counting, gives a bad appearance. More importantly, it gives some time and fuel for the conspiracy theorists to start spinning webs.
When one guy is ahead, but over 5 days the other guy slowly narrows the margin and eventually wins by 1000 votes, it feels like the counting continues until the right guy wins. As opposed to, on election night 99% of votes are counted and the same guy wins by 1000 votes, you say, "Wow. What a tight election."
So, my argument would be that you don't want this endless counting because it undermines citizens' confidence in elections and encourages the conspiracy theories you profess to not like.
At a minimum, since many states deliver election night results, showing it can be done, when blue states choose to do days/weeks of counting, it has to be because they want it to be like that - and that has all kinds of harmful effects.
There will be close elections that require recounts and involve various levels of challenges. That's fine.Sure thing. Here's one for you. California 49 was called for Darrell Issa (R) on November 28th, 2016. So let's count together. That's 20 days after election day.
This. Rather than laugh and sarcastically yell "fraud" or "stolen", why are we allowing this to occur when we know 1) it doesn't need to as other states have shown and 2) it clearly has the potential to undermine citizen confidence in the process? Let's control that which we can reasonably control and live with the rest?The election season some states are having and the days/weeks of counting, gives a bad appearance. More importantly, it gives some time and fuel for the conspiracy theorists to start spinning webs.
When one guy is ahead, but over 5 days the other guy slowly narrows the margin and eventually wins by 1000 votes, it feels like the counting continues until the right guy wins. As opposed to, on election night 99% of votes are counted and the same guy wins by 1000 votes, you say, "Wow. What a tight election."
So, my argument would be that you don't want this endless counting because it undermines citizens' confidence in elections and encourages the conspiracy theories you profess to not like.
At a minimum, since many states deliver election night results, showing it can be done, when blue states choose to do days/weeks of counting, it has to be because they want it to be like that - and that has all kinds of harmful effects.
The word fraud must be included. ImoThis. Rather than laugh and sarcastically yell "fraud" or "stolen", why are we allowing this to occur when we know 1) it doesn't need to as other states have shown and 2) it clearly has the potential to undermine citizen confidence in the process? Let's control that which we can reasonably control and live with the rest?
In case you missed any of my previous posts on the topic, I agree 100% with this approach. The State legislatures that still don't allow tabulation to begin before election day, as well as other bizarre anomalies that can feed the conspiracy narratives, need to scrap and refine the current process.There will be close elections that require recounts and involve various levels of challenges. That's fine.
The point is with a smart, practical election process, the vast majority of races will not involve any of that AND let's have 99% of the vote counted (it can be done in 4-5 hours) and, even if we still don't have a declared winner, we don't have counting for days and weeks and all the trouble that comes with that.
And those of us that go off half-cocked and spew inaccurate beefs reward them with ample, "see how stupid?" moments that undermine legitimate grievance. Twitter has a lot of piszed-off dopes on both sides.They drag this out into absurdity and then wonder where conspiracy theories come from...