Like eating shellfish? Or mixing fabrics?
Oh so you CAN pick and choose what to follow. Got it.You're showing your Bible ignorance. New Testament believers are no longer required to follow OT law. Hope this helps.
I have no idea what this means.No - I'm not Catholic so I don't ignore parts of the Bible.
The Bible never ignores sin, it defines it.
The 10 Commandments are optional now?You're showing your Bible ignorance. New Testament believers are no longer required to follow OT law. Hope this helps.
That sounds like a personal problem. Praying you learn more. As a Christian you will want to see Proverbs 1:7. Hope this helps.I have no idea what this means.
My relationship with God is based on love, not fear.That sounds like a personal problem. Praying you learn more. As a Christian you will want to see Proverbs 1:7. Hope this helps.
Oh so you CAN pick and choose what to follow. Got it.
Which parts are "true" versus "optional" versus outdated and not relevant to modern life?Nope. God decides, not man. But do whatever you want.
For some, if they believed the Bible is true they would have to really examine their lives and make tough changes.
That’s my philosophy as well.You'll need to study that for yourself. Ask your priest. He would have a different answer than me.
Christ's death put an end to OT law for Christians (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15). Christians are now called to follow a higher law of love (Galatians 6:2; Matthew 22:37-39). Hope this helps.
Proverbs is OT.You'll have to take that up with them. Be careful tho - don't violate Proverbs 26:4.
There's another possible option: your Christian god (or any god) does not exist.I love when people try to prove the Bible is wrong or those who believe in it are dumb.
Hint: If you think one thing and God thinks another, one of you is wrong.
If the film doesn’t bash Catholics, why would you say he owns it because he bashes Catholics?I said he bashes Catholics. Not the film. Looks like you are the one needing an upgrade in your prescription
Because he loves to bring up the scandals to piss off catholic people. He does it all the time. Film is about one of the scandals. .If the film doesn’t bash Catholics, why would you say he owns it because he bashes Catholics?
He's all over the place. He talks about and quotes from the Old Testament constantly then turns around and says the Old Testament doesn't apply to Christians but we should take the whole Bible literally.There's another possible option: your Christian god (or any god) does not exist.
It really is more about pedophiles than Catholics. The Cult is always accusing people of pedophilia and they love to talk about organizations that run secret rings. That movie is about the biggest pedophile ring in history. The fact it was run by the Catholic Church is interesting but not really my point at all. It could have been another church or some other Cult.Because he loves to bring up the scandals to piss off catholic people. He does it all the time. Film is about one of the scandals. .
Yeah teachers again have higher frequency of sleeping with minors than priests but you hate that fact for some reasonIt really is more about pedophiles than Catholics. The Cult is always accusing people of pedophilia and they love to talk about organizations that run secret rings. That movie is about the biggest pedophile ring in history. The fact it was run by the Catholic Church is interesting but not really my point at all. It could have been another church or some other Cult.
Deflection. Were you a DB in high school?Yeah teachers again have higher frequency of sleeping with minors than priests but you hate that fact for some reason
Isn't that the goal of most people? Save yourself until marriage? Probably is not as common as used to be but bet there are still significant numbers where that is the case.
Not a deflection at all. He's talking about the biggest pedophile ring in history which isn't even true. So I pointed out a profession currently that has a higher rateDeflection. Were you a DB in high school?
We have already been through that horsesh*t claim by you. Not a single person believes it and you provided zero data. As I recall, your evidence was an article that said they had no evidence. LOL. My guess is that it was sponsored by the Church.Yeah teachers again have higher frequency of sleeping with minors than priests but you hate that fact for some reason
So the film doesn’t portray the Catholic Church in a bad light?Because he loves to bring up the scandals to piss off catholic people. He does it all the time. Film is about one of the scandals. .
Na I showed you data from many articles that showed it to be true. You as usual just kept repeating yourself and ignored it which is what you always do when wrongWe have already been through that horsesh*t claim by you. Not a single person believes it and you provided zero data. As I recall, your evidence was an article that said they had no evidence. LOL. My guess is that it was sponsored by the Church.
That's not the same as bashing Catholic people.So the film doesn’t portray the Catholic Church in a bad light?
Citation needed.Yeah teachers again have higher frequency of sleeping with minors than priests but you hate that fact for some reason