TWITTER FILES: Statement to Congress THE CENSORSHIP-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX

nypost.com

Elon Muskā€™s BBC interview shows journalists donā€™t speak truth to power ā€” they coddle it

The state of journalism, once seen as a profession filled with noble individuals, is now overly comprised of people who are as likable as herpes and expect praise for mediocrity just like a ā€œnepo bā€¦
nypost.com nypost.com
šŸ˜† šŸ¤£

This present-day profile of mainstream-media journalists is not just an American problem but international, as Twitter owner Elon Musk found out in his interview with BBC reporter James Clayton.

The pair got onto the topic of censorship and hate speech on Twitter as Clayton noted Musk brought back controversial people previously banned and former Twitter employees have accused the platform of lacking moderation for ā€œhate speech.ā€

ā€œWhat hate speech are you talking about?ā€ Musk promptly inquired. ā€œI mean, you use Twitter. Do you see a rise in hate speech? Just a personal anecdote? I donā€™t.ā€

The CEO asked Clayton to give him one instance of hate speech heā€™d seen since Musk took over ā€” but Clayton couldnā€™t provide one.

ā€œYou cannot give me a single example of hateful content, not even one tweet. And yet you claimed that hateful content was high. That is false, you just lied,ā€ an annoyed Musk said.

ā€œNo, I claimed that there are many organizations that say that that kind of information is on the rise,ā€ Clayton fumbled.

ā€œThe Strategic Dialogue Institute [Institute for Strategic Dialogue] in the UK they will say that.ā€

Musk continued to push back: ā€œYou literally said you experienced more hateful content and then couldnā€™t name a single example. Thatā€™s absurd!ā€
 
1702069814495.png
 
Become informed.


It's not just the State Department. It's also the Pentagon. It's also the Department of Homeland Security. I think Americans would be really horrified to know how much of their taxpayer dollars have gone into not just helping launch some of these things, but also helping market, promote, and work with them. There is a reason why this censorship has been so effective. And it's not, you know, it's not any one thing but there are lots of these companies, organizations, for-profit companies, and federal government agencies that are working together. That's why, you know, in our lawsuit we were also joined with the state of Texas on some of these issues because it is so serious.
Click to expand...
 
gneiss rocks said:
The democrats almost always vote as one and yes they are very anti first amendment. Occasionally Tulsi steaks out, but that is about it.
White Supremacist are in the republican party. You really must want to show how brainwashed you are I guess?
Click to expand...
I went back and was reading old post and noticed this. Strange how occasionally Tusli spoke out and the result of that is she left the party.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top