Trump needs to deliver

ironmanz35 said:
Which is it?
Click to expand...
???? Can you not read? They are not mutually exclusive. Both are true. WTF.
ironmanz35 said:
So your claim is the driving factor to US increased immigration was the pandemic and not the Biden Policies? Interesting take.
Click to expand...
I never said that. There was a confluence of factors that included a huge change in timing and patterns plus the fact that Biden was more liberal with asylum claims. All of this was done within US immigration law. That said, he did try several times to modify the laws to slow the flow which he successfully accomplished in May of this year.
ironmanz35 said:
Sure In your opinion.

All MSM media is stating WOKE policies cost us. Figured you would be up to speed more then you are.
Click to expand...
No. It is not my opinion. It is the opinion of the electorate. Show me an exit poll or survey where woke was a driver. The people who get their panties in a wad about woke are the entrenched MAGAs, the people that swung from Harris did not do that because of "woke". What a dumb assertion.
 
ProV1 said:
???? Can you not read? They are not mutually exclusive. Both are true. WTF.
Click to expand...
Guess you do not see my sarcasm.
ProV1 said:
I never said that. There was a confluence of factors that included a huge change in timing and patterns plus the fact that Biden was more liberal with asylum claims. All of this was done within US immigration law. That said, he did try several times to modify the laws to slow the flow which he successfully accomplished in May of this year.
Click to expand...
The driving factor was Biden's liberal policies.
ProV1 said:
No. It is not my opinion. It is the opinion of the electorate. Show me an exit poll or survey where woke was a driver. The people who get their panties in a wad about woke are the entrenched MAGAs, the people that swung from Harris did not do that because of "woke". What a dumb assertion.
Click to expand...
Carville, Axelrod and numerous other Dem operatives state otherwise.

www.newsweek.com

James Carville blames Democrats' losses on "woke era" politics

The political strategist said that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris had created a "sense of dishonor" among the U.S. electorate.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
www.ocregister.com

Letters: Democrats are out of touch, that’s why they lost

This election was about a tone deaf administration that failed to listen to the American people
www.ocregister.com www.ocregister.com
 
ironmanz35 said:
Guess you do not see my sarcasm.

The driving factor was Biden's liberal policies.

Carville, Axelrod and numerous other Dem operatives state otherwise.

www.newsweek.com

James Carville blames Democrats' losses on "woke era" politics

The political strategist said that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris had created a "sense of dishonor" among the U.S. electorate.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
www.ocregister.com

Letters: Democrats are out of touch, that’s why they lost

This election was about a tone deaf administration that failed to listen to the American people
www.ocregister.com www.ocregister.com
Click to expand...
I did not ask you for pundit post mortem opinions. I asked you for data coming directly from the electorate in the form of their top issues.
 
Hammerdrill said:
You keep telling us over and over that none of this stuff affects you. You don’t understand Shakespeare’s phrase?
Click to expand...
I actually only respond to the crazy assertions that an election result is impactful to me in any meaningful way. It is no more impactful than when the Indians play a baseball game. I have an interest in outcome but win or lose, my mood, demeanor, outlook, and life impact does not change. Can you explain why that seems so foreign to you?
 
OhioBobcatFan06 said:
After this DEI bs I won't go back to work unless I'm promised another planet
Click to expand...
Does this mean no more stimulus checks?
Sad Oh No GIF by Rockwell Trading
 
ProV1 said:
I did not ask you for pundit post mortem opinions. I asked you for data coming directly from the electorate in the form of their top issues.
Click to expand...
Two of the most recent top strategists for the democrats shared their views.
I find it odd you discount what two of the Democratic parties most successful political operatives have to say on the issue.
My apologies, evidently you know more than Carville and Axelrod.
The Dem's could certainly utilize your expertise to dig out of this hole they are in.
 
ProV1 said:
I actually only respond to the crazy assertions that an election result is impactful to me in any meaningful way. It is no more impactful than when the Indians play a baseball game. I have an interest in outcome but win or lose, my mood, demeanor, outlook, and life impact does not change. Can you explain why that seems so foreign to you?
Click to expand...
312
 
ironmanz35 said:
Two of the most recent top strategists for the democrats shared their views.
I find it odd you discount what two of the Democratic parties most successful political operatives have to say on the issue.
My apologies, evidently you know more than Carville and Axelrod.
The Dem's could certainly utilize your expertise to dig out of this hole they are in.
Click to expand...
Again, I did not ask you for opinions by pundits. I asked you for the feedback from actual voters on their top issues driving their voting decision. Just say cant and we can move on.
 
Costa said:
Unemployment will, thankfully, go up when several million useless government employees get canned.
Click to expand...
It will be interesting to find out where the unemployment picture is actually at these days, given the fact that they’ve been lying about unemployment numbers, as a matter, of course, for the past two years
 
cabezadecaballo said:
It will be interesting to find out where the unemployment picture is actually at these days, given the fact that they’ve been lying about unemployment numbers, as a matter, of course, for the past two years
Click to expand...
Everyone who is in the real world knows that the economy is in the toilet.
 
Costa said:
Everyone who is in the real world knows that the economy is in the toilet.
Click to expand...
As long as Paul and Nancy Pelosi got all of their green stocks sold in time, it’s fine. Don’t worry about it. Just don’t want to create a run or anything.

Good thing for all those fake polls read by Democrat investors right ? Someone had to buy that yit. Hopefully not any of the index funds I participate in…..
 
cabezadecaballo said:
It will be interesting to find out where the unemployment picture is actually at these days, given the fact that they’ve been lying about unemployment numbers, as a matter, of course, for the past two years
Click to expand...
Then they were lying while Trump was in office. The same method is be used.
 
Costa said:
Where did I say 3M? Probese Dumb
Click to expand...
By definition, several means three or more (but often less than many, which we will cover next.) So, if several party-goers out of a group of nine were intoxicated, several could correctly be translated as three or four.
 
ProV1 said:
By definition, several means three or more (but often less than many, which we will cover next.) So, if several party-goers out of a group of nine were intoxicated, several could correctly be translated as three or four.
Click to expand...
www.dictionary.com

"Few" vs. "Couple" vs. "Several": How Much Do They Really Mean?

Bear with us a few—or maybe a couple, or even several—minutes as we explain the difference between "few," "couple," and "several" and how to use them.
www.dictionary.com www.dictionary.com

Several most commonly means more than two, but fewer than many.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top