I got to watch the game yesterday on BCSN. Davis played a good game. 20+ points, 12+ rebounds, 5+ blocks. Showed an ability to catch the ball in traffic, pass post to post, create angles for a post entry, good touch from the foul line. His game is quiet - not a high volume shooter, very efficient scorer, doesn't force shots and played to his strengths pretty well. More of a classic big man.
St. Francis was double teaming him before the catch and doing all the annoying stuff a team does to try and get under someone's skin - standing chest to chest, putting hands in his face, cutting his legs - all before the ball was even over half court or inbounded. His 1st few fouls were a reaction to them getting under his skin. Even the foul in the 2nd half was a result of getting leg whipped by the kid laying on the floor. He was just trying to get his foot out from between the leg whip and got called for a foul for some reason.
He does have heavy legs, but is strong as hell and has solid skills and understanding of the game - didn't put the ball on the floor much in traffic, kept the ball high on put backs and blocked 5 or 6 shots without fouling or being a great leaper. He didn't sit down in the post because they were fronting him with one guy and had a double team on the back side before the pass was even made. The only entry was over the top.
For me the "project" part of his game is becoming quicker on his feet which can come naturally with age and happen sooner with work - he is only a soph. At this point I'm not sure I see Big 10 (Iowa was at a game this week) - but he is more than a D1 project. It my be that my definition of project is different than yours. I view a project as someone who has the physical tools, but lacks skill or basketball I.Q.
I would have liked to have seen a Davis vs Vorst matchup two talented young bigs with different strengths going at it.
A few friends had a similar assessment as you so I am outnumbered

.