William Blake
Active member
Well critical thinking can hypothesize the other 15 variables based on the lack of factual information or even better yet institutional historical data. Like will a rookie, say TIm Tebow who performed well at Florida during the Spurrier years perform well in the pros - historically speaking not (a variable). But just because I think he's a great guy and I am a huge Gator fan who wants to see him succeed and love him to death, still the odds are stacked against him because not many Spurrier QBs have succeeded in the pros. Thinking critically allows me to ponder the questions of attributes that will lead to his success or failure. Does that make sense?Great background!
The only problem is I don't see how critical thinking can be used yet, not enough valid factual information and facts historically, like trying to solve an algebraic expression with 15 variables an you only know 2 today??
Not winning an analogy was against Clark.
Last edited: