Jordan refuses to testify proving his own complicity in Jan 6

Mean Machine said:
I can conclude this. When Jordan was asked by Brett Baier if he spoke to Trump on Jan. 6th he squirmed like a maggot and did not directly answer the question. After he found out that the commission was acquiring phone records for certain members of Congress he finally spilled the beans and admitted that he spoke to Trump on Jan, 6. Why did he change his tune so quickly? Because he knew they would find out so he tried to get ahead of it. He knows he is screwed. Gonna be so much fun to watch this play out. These fools are going to completely incriminate themselves in the texts and phone records.
Click to expand...
I can’t wait to hear what the Pelosi Drama Club decides to name the un-crimes that they invented to uselessly accuse people of committing.
 
Redandgold said:
Kangaroo Court is more ignorance. The Republican Party had their chance to appoint people to the committee and they attempted to seat Congressmen Jordan and Banks, two men who were defenders of Trump and on record for denying that the attack on the Capitol was excessive in any way. Hardly unbiased jurors. No court would have accepted them if truth was the goal. Stop playing games. This is a legal committee and investigation, and you are nothing more than someone supporting the cover-up.
Click to expand...
And you think the people on the committee now are unbiased? ?

They refused the Republican representation, sat two anti Trumpers and called it bipartisan ?

It's a farce.
 
Mean Machine said:
They have no interest in finding out the truth. They just want to protect the Orange Goblin at all costs. The GOP no longer deals in reality. They have watched Trump lie and cheat so long now that they not only accept it, they like it.
Click to expand...
Every rational person knows the truth ?‍♂️

It wasnt an insurrection, it wasnt some conspiracy. It was malcontents who wanted cover to break stuff and fools who got caught up in it.
 
y2h said:
And you think the people on the committee now are unbiased? ?

They refused the Republican representation, sat two anti Trumpers and called it bipartisan ?

It's a farce.
Click to expand...
You’re the farce. Banks and Jordan were already lying about what happened. Why would anyone believe they would participate ain an honest investigation?
 
Redandgold said:
You’re the farce. Banks and Jordan were already lying about what happened. Why would anyone believe they would participate ain an honest investigation?
Click to expand...
Why would anyone believe a committee made up of people who hate Trump would participate in an honest investigation?
 
1641993655227.png
 
Redandgold said:
In theory, they are. They will sit in judgement and decide if anyone will face charges. Sort of like a grand jury, but still jurists.
Click to expand...
In theory and in reality, no, they are not. Just because you can type something on a keyboard does not make it true.
 
Just like impeachment trials where 100 senators are made to be jurors then they listen to the evidence and then vote the party line. I have come to wonder what would happen if a President committed a real impeachable crime how would our people we vote into office to represent our wishes vote? I would hope not party lines but I am beginning to wonder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top