Dems push for background checks on ammo purchases

 
Lol. I have no idea what I am talking about? You hav dems wanting to do a background check on Ammo. Lol. That's really all anyone needs to know.

Give a dem an inch....
And that takes away your guns how? We will just mark you down as not wanting to do anything about gun violence in the US. You like to cry a lot about it. (Because as you have stated yourself, You are weak.) Your constant use of LOL, shows how juvenile you are. Already State laws on the books and still people have guns. How is that since they have been coming for your guns since forever? Weak and scared and sad.
 
You are an established liar and just like with all your posts, you have no clue what you are talking about. You are weak and scared and ignorant.
You are a liar.

You are also a "tory", hiding behind your mommy's skirt. You are an liberal DC establishment shill, and therefore not permitted to call anyone else weak or scared. Ideologically, you are simply a kept bitch echo.
 
And that takes away your guns how? We will just mark you down as not wanting to do anything about gun violence in the US. You like to cry a lot about it. (Because as you have stated yourself, You are weak.) Your constant use of LOL, shows how juvenile you are. Already State laws on the books and still people have guns. How is that since they have been coming for your guns since forever? Weak and scared and sad.
Baby steps buddy. How many examples do you want of the libs taking baby steps? Ya want to talk about gay "rights"? No we have men having babies and mentally ill men thinking they are women and competing in womens sports.

Nothing different. Give a lib an inch.
 
Baby steps buddy. How many examples do you want of the libs taking baby steps? Ya want to talk about gay "rights"? No we have men having babies and mentally ill men thinking they are women and competing in womens sports.

Nothing different. Give a lib an inch.
1) That could never happen. You're crazy.

2) Nobody is really doing this much. What are you so worried about ?

3) So what ? That won't happen here.

4) Why are you such as bigoted hater ? This is just another version of normal.

God damn the Democrat party
 
Baby steps buddy. How many examples do you want of the libs taking baby steps? Ya want to talk about gay "rights"? No we have men having babies and mentally ill men thinking they are women and competing in womens sports.

Nothing different. Give a lib an inch.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."

So, gay people should not have "rights"? Should they be allowed to have guns? How about Mentally ill men?
 
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."

So, gay people should not have "rights"? Should they be allowed to have guns? How about Mentally ill men?
Lol....leave it up to you libs and in 5 years, you'll be questioning whether citizens should have guns.
 
Explain how this is grabbing your guns? More Conservative stupidity.
By definition this is exactly the kind of thing that will remove guns from law abiding citizens. This is a long view effort where the goal isn't to directly violate the 2nd amendment but to circumvent it by raising the costs and regulatory complexities of owning guns. It's all part of a plan. And those on the right who refuse to see it are simply stupid.
 
By definition this is exactly the kind of thing that will remove guns from law abiding citizens. This is a long view effort where the goal isn't to directly violate the 2nd amendment but to circumvent it by raising the costs and regulatory complexities of owning guns. It's all part of a plan. And those on the right who refuse to see it are simply stupid.
They will tax ammo harder first. Greed is always the path past conservatism.
 
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal."

So, gay people should not have "rights"? Should they be allowed to have guns? How about Mentally ill men?
Hey stupid - remember when Obummer was against gay marriage ? lol

Marriage is the union of a man and a woman. A gay man always had "the equal right" to marry a woman. Some hetero males also lack a desire to marry a woman, but they all have "the right", with a woman's consent.

You people had to buu-fuu the dictionary again, pretending to "make it all 'work'". Academia has become a cruel joke.
 
Last edited:
By definition this is exactly the kind of thing that will remove guns from law abiding citizens. This is a long view effort where the goal isn't to directly violate the 2nd amendment but to circumvent it by raising the costs and regulatory complexities of owning guns. It's all part of a plan. And those on the right who refuse to see it are simply stupid.
Worst 50 year plan I have ever seen. Time to stop crying about nonsense. "States that require background checks for guns have lower rates of firearm homicide and suicide as well as lower rates of gun trafficking." But people are still able to own them. Stop crying about gun violence when you will do nothing to lessen it. It's tired.
Lol....leave it up to you libs and in 5 years, you'll be questioning whether citizens should have guns.
I see once again that you are not capable of answering a question.
Hey stupid - remember when Obummer was against gay marriage ? lol

Marriage is the union of a man and a woman. A gay man always had "the equal right" to marry a woman. Some hetero males also lack a desire to marry a woman, but they all have "the right", with a woman's consent.

You people had to buu-fuu the dictionary again, pretending to "make it all 'work'". Academia has become a cruel joke.
Wrong! "the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship" This ain't 1950.

The first recorded evidence of marriage ceremonies uniting one woman and one man dates from about 2350 B.C., in Mesopotamia. Over the next several hundred years, marriage evolved into a widespread institution embraced by the ancient Hebrews, Greeks, and Romans. But back then, marriage had little to do with love or with religion.

Marriage's primary purpose was to bind women to men, and thus guarantee that a man's children were truly his biological heirs. Through marriage, a woman became a man's property. In the betrothal ceremony of ancient Greece, a father would hand over his daughter with these words: "I pledge my daughter for the purpose of producing legitimate offspring." Among the ancient Hebrews, men were free to take several wives; married Greeks and Romans were free to satisfy their sexual urges with concubines, prostitutes, and even teenage male lovers, while their wives were required to stay home and tend to the household. If wives failed to produce offspring, their husbands could give them back and marry someone else."

AWWWW... Too bad it has evolved into the horrible thing it is now!


"
 
"We just feel, for public safety, we'd like to do background checks on ammunition buyers. You can still buy your ammo."

"You will need to purchase your ammo from here on by credit or debit card, or personal check. For public safety and traceability".

"We are going to limit the amount of ammo you can purchase in any calendar year, you really don't need much to hunt or protect yourself or your family".

"Due to an alarming rise in mass shootings in the area, we are hereby authorizing your local police to call on you at your residence, and ask you to peacefully turn over all ammunition. All transactions over the last two years have been recorded electronically. Please do not resist."
 
Worst 50 year plan I have ever seen. Time to stop crying about nonsense. "States that require background checks for guns have lower rates of firearm homicide and suicide as well as lower rates of gun trafficking." But people are still able to own them. Stop crying about gun violence when you will do nothing to lessen it. It's tired.

I see once again that you are not capable of answering a question.

Wrong! "the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship" This ain't 1950.

The first recorded evidence of marriage ceremonies uniting one woman and one man dates from about 2350 B.C., in Mesopotamia. Over the next several hundred years, marriage evolved into a widespread institution embraced by the ancient Hebrews, Greeks, and Romans. But back then, marriage had little to do with love or with religion.

Marriage's primary purpose was to bind women to men, and thus guarantee that a man's children were truly his biological heirs. Through marriage, a woman became a man's property. In the betrothal ceremony of ancient Greece, a father would hand over his daughter with these words: "I pledge my daughter for the purpose of producing legitimate offspring." Among the ancient Hebrews, men were free to take several wives; married Greeks and Romans were free to satisfy their sexual urges with concubines, prostitutes, and even teenage male lovers, while their wives were required to stay home and tend to the household. If wives failed to produce offspring, their husbands could give them back and marry someone else."

AWWWW... Too bad it has evolved into the horrible thing it is now!


"
Do you know why it evolved into the thing it is now, (or should be until about 10 years ago when you creeps buu fuu’ed the dictionary), with one woman having equal rights with a man in a marriage ?

it is predominantly this way now because of Christian white men. Don’t ever forget that you phony.
 
"We just feel, for public safety, we'd like to do background checks on ammunition buyers. You can still buy your ammo."

"You will need to purchase your ammo from here on by credit or debit card, or personal check. For public safety and traceability".

"We are going to limit the amount of ammo you can purchase in any calendar year, you really don't need much to hunt or protect yourself or your family".

"Due to an alarming rise in mass shootings in the area, we are hereby authorizing your local police to call on you at your residence, and ask you to peacefully turn over all ammunition. All transactions over the last two years have been recorded electronically. Please do not resist."
Clearly the endgame.
 
Do you know why it evolved into the thing it is now, (or should be until about 10 years ago when you creeps buu fuu’ed the dictionary), with one woman having equal rights with a man in a marriage ?

it is predominantly this way now because of Christian white men. Don’t ever forget that you phony.
The Married Women's Property Act 1839 grants married women the right to own (but not control) property in her own name.
 
In the early nineteenth century, married women in the US were legally subordinate to their husbands.

Until Christian white men changed the law. Here. By the legal mechanism proscribed by the Christian white men that went before them.

Are you familiar with Sharia Law ?
 
Until Christian white men changed the law. Here. By the legal mechanism proscribed by the Christian white men that went before them.

Are you familiar with Sharia Law ?
Of course I'm familiar with Sharia Law. It's what you all cried about for 8 years when Obama was president. Remember how it was put into practice all over the US.

You know nothing about Sharia Law, and it has absolutely nothing to do with any of this conversation. It was just something else for you to be unnecessarily scared of.
 
Of course I'm familiar with Sharia Law. It's what you all cried about for 8 years when Obama was president. Remember how it was put into practice all over the US.

You know nothing about Sharia Law, and it has absolutely nothing to do with any of this conversation. It was just something else for you to be unnecessarily scared of.
You deserve to be abused by your politics. Too bad you morons have to drag the rest of us down with you.

If you were content to just culturally suicide yourselves, I'd love to point and laugh from afar. Too bad.
 
.
Top