psycho_dad
Well-known member
Except we know that people did not live to be 70 on average 3500 years ago. There are censuses from the Romans that show ages of people about 11 AD or so. Not close to 70. Modern medicine has doubled our life expectancy. It would be nice to have cleaner air and water though. That might help out a lot more. One side of the aisle does not care so much about the water and air. One does. Which party is for clean water and better sanitation and which is not? Which party is taking us backwards?By "science" (notice the quotation marks) I'm talking about in the context of the pharmaceutical industry and the claims that it is the answer to our health problems. I assume the numbers you cite are specific to the United States. Life expectancy figures also tend to include all forms of death, including World Wars. Clean water and sanitization should get most of the credit, especially when you consider the conditions in this country around 1900.
Psalm 90:10 (New King James Version)
The days of our lives are seventy years;
And if by reason of strength they are eighty years.
Yet their boast is only labor and sorrow;
For it is soon cut off, and we fly away.
That psalm was written about the 3,500 years ago and notice it was a given that people live to be 70. Not much has changed.
Why did life expectancy drop so much from when Adam and Eve etc were around? 700-1000 years they lived.
Last edited: