OldSoulon
Well-known member
Republican lawmakers in Ohio unveil bill prohibiting transgender kids from beginning transition
House Bill 454 has 25 sponsors and co-sponsors, of a 99-member Ohio House.
Bunch of bigots trying to protect children! I can’t believe we won’t let a kid, with an underdeveloped brain, decide their future at 10. Makes me sick.![]()
Republican lawmakers in Ohio unveil bill prohibiting transgender kids from beginning transition
House Bill 454 has 25 sponsors and co-sponsors, of a 99-member Ohio House.www.cleveland.com
Yep, but WE are part of a cult.The best part of the article is where the Lady Commie says children are being used as pawns because they can’t cut their schlongs off and pretend they are something they’re not.
What does a school board meeting have to do with a kid wanting his dyck cut off?So I guess parents don't know what's best for their kids now? I guess peeps can just stop heading to those board meetings then. The State can take it from here.
It's the principle. Parents would appear to believe that they know what's best for their kids, right? So the current wave of protest seems to be around a group or body (i.e. school board) deciding what's best for their child. "Don't teach my kid CRT." "Don't make my kid wear a mask." So in that spirit, it's then cool when the State can tell the parents what's best for their child? You good with one but not the other?What does a school board meeting have to do with a kid wanting his dyck cut off?
Well wearing a mask or not, is hardly the same thing as changing one's sex. To try and make then equal in any way is nonsense.It's the principle. Parents would appear to believe that they know what's best for their kids, right? So the current wave of protest seems to be around a group or body (i.e. school board) deciding what's best for their child. "Don't teach my kid CRT." "Don't make my kid wear a mask." So in that spirit, it's then cool when the State can tell the parents what's best for their child? You good with one but not the other?
Any doctor that would perform sex change surgery on a minor, parental consent or not, should lose their license.It's the principle. Parents would appear to believe that they know what's best for their kids, right? So the current wave of protest seems to be around a group or body (i.e. school board) deciding what's best for their child. "Don't teach my kid CRT." "Don't make my kid wear a mask." So in that spirit, it's then cool when the State can tell the parents what's best for their child? You good with one but not the other?
How come the functions on the iPhone for this website aren’t all there anymore? I wanted to put ?, but all that is available on iPhone is ??? Also no bolding or italics anymore… Anyone have an answer?So I guess parents don't know what's best for their kids now? I guess peeps can just stop heading to those board meetings then. The State can take it from here.
It's not about equating the specific occurrences in this case, it's about the larger point - as I already stated. I can agree or disagree about a cosmetic surgery for a minor, but should that be the parents call? Or should the state tell me.Well wearing a mask or not, is hardly the same thing as changing one's sex. To try and make then equal in any way is nonsense.
Cosmetic surgery? Is that what a sex change is? No, your larger point makes no sense when you are using these 2 things with it.It's not about equating the specific occurrences in this case, it's about the larger point - as I already stated. I can agree or disagree about a cosmetic surgery for a minor, but should that be the parents call? Or should the state tell me.
So you agree that the State should help parent then? You against other cosmetic surgeries for minors that aren't of a reconstructive manner?Any doctor that would perform sex change surgery on a minor, parental consent or not, should lose their license.
Pretty much. Since minors aren’t fully grown, lots of things can change prior to becoming an adult.So you agree that the State should help parent then? You against other cosmetic surgeries for minors that aren't of a reconstructive manner?
I have no idea. Would this not qualify as a cosmetic surgery? I assume it's performed to reshape the structure of the body to alter a person's appearance, no?Cosmetic surgery? Is that what a sex change is?
Sure it does. You just don't like it because you agree with the State in one of the instances.No, your larger point makes no sense when you are using these 2 things with it.
My iPhone functions seem to work fine today. But your ? is noted. I would have expected nothing less.How come the functions on the iPhone for this website aren’t all there anymore? I wanted to put ?, but all that is available on iPhone is ??? Also no bolding or italics anymore… Anyone have an answer?
It has nothing to do with what I like, it makes no sense.I have no idea. Would this not qualify as a cosmetic surgery? I assume it's performed to reshape the structure of the body to alter a person's appearance, no?
Sure it does. You just don't like it because you agree with the State in one of the instances.
It makes no sense to you.It has nothing to do with what I like, it makes no sense.
Yeah, but what about wearing masks??!! ?You can be in favor of small government and also be in favor of protecting children.
We have laws against a parent abusing a child.
A minor cannot enter into a contract.
We have laws against child labor.
A minor cannot purchase cigarettes or alcohol.
There are age restrictions on marriage.
You should know better by now that common sense doesn't register with Liberals.It has nothing to do with what I like, it makes no sense.
Hormone blockers are not cosmetic surgery. If a child takes hormone blockers they will become sterile, there is no coming back from that. If that is not child abuse then there is no such thing as child abuse.I have no idea. Would this not qualify as a cosmetic surgery? I assume it's performed to reshape the structure of the body to alter a person's appearance, no?
Sure it does. You just don't like it because you agree with the State in one of the instances.
Hormone blockers are not cosmetic surgery. If a child takes hormone blockers they will become sterile, there is no coming back from that. If that is not child abuse then there is no such thing as child abuse.