Bull.GC handed Ed's the game. Enormous mistakes the entire game.
GC will be the best teams Ed’s plays all season TBH.Again, Eds will win every game this season comfortably. GC made it interesting for a half.
There is no stopping the Eagles this year.
Team? Maybe talent-wise, yes. They were not a great team.GC will be the best teams Ed’s plays all season TBH.
I think Massillon and Hoban have the lines to slug it out with Eds. Then it comes down to how good the quarterbacks play. Who knows. That is why they play the games.Team? Maybe talent-wise, yes. They were not a great team.
Massillon and Hoban are great teams. Sure they don't have GC's D1 guys ( well maybe Hoban is close) but they are really good.
GC had one guy on offense who was affecting the game. Their other play was throwing the ball down the sidelines to the FSU recruit.
I agree to a point. I attended the game and I can say (up close) OLGC were a really talented team. I think one overlooked aspect was this was OLGC's first game. That (likely) contributed to their sloppy first half play. But don't think OLGC was a bunch of talented players with no organization or discipline. They were very well coached. They compete in a top National East Coast conference.Team? Maybe talent-wise, yes. They were not a great team.
Massillon and Hoban are great teams. Sure they don't have GC's D1 guys ( well maybe Hoban is close) but they are really good.
GC had one guy on offense who was affecting the game. Their other play was throwing the ball down the sidelines to the FSU recruit.
They are for sure a monster. .. lol, was up in West Park watching with a bunch of my Ed's people. ... it is what it is (expectations are just that high) but they were complaining about how the Eagles were struggling, especially in the first half.Again, Eds will win every game this season comfortably. GC made it interesting for a half.
There is no stopping the Eagles this year.
I have seen Eds play twice, Hoban play once and have not had a chance to see Massillon play. I plan on going to Eds games with both Hoban and Massillon. As far as comparing those teams right now it is very difficult. When Hoban played Eds last year, their quarterback played poorly, and Hobans defense couldn't stop St Eds quarterback.He killed them more with his running ability extending plays and gaining key first down drives. Then when Hoban targeted the quarterback in the second half, they gave the ball to the stud running back. Hoban couldn't stop the run all night. Do they have a better quarterback and a better dline this year to slow Eds down and a quarterback that can both run and pass at a high level? I don't know. Time will tell.Congratulations and Impressive by Ed's. Hoban and Massillon should be tests but even if the eagles lose one of those which I don't think they will, they are the clear favorites for the threepeat. Both lines are just outstanding and the LB's I was very impressed with. The offensive play calling in the second half was outstanding IMO. Even great teams can lose in the regular season . It just takes an off day. I'm not seeing any evidence of that though but you never know.
I know the longtime coach, Gretchen Ludwig, took a similar position at another school. Trouble finding a new coach perhaps? Something else?I was surprised that St. Ed's got rid of the cheerleaders. I thought they did a great job. Was there a problem?
My understanding was she informed the school in the fall that she was leaving. In the spring they told the parents that St. Eds would not be fielding cheerleading teams going forward. This was a school decision. Something about Joe's and Mag's school would be responsible going forward. I feel bad for the members that have been with the school all these years.I know the longtime coach, Gretchen Ludwig, took a similar position at another school. Trouble finding a new coach perhaps? Something else?
There's bringbackst.edscheer on Instagram so I sent a message. The school said it's for insurance reasons since the girls are not St. Ed's students and St. Joes/Mags are not willing to take it on.My understanding was she informed the school in the fall that she was leaving. In the spring they told the parents that St. Eds would not be fielding cheerleading teams going forward. This was a school decision. Something about Joe's and Mag's school would be responsible going forward. I feel bad for the members that have been with the school all these years.
There's bringbackst.edscheer on Instagram so I sent a message. The school said it's for insurance reasons since the girls are not St. Ed's students and St. Joes/Mags are not willing to take it on.
It's a shame. We've had cheerleaders from the girl's schools for well over 50 years. Not sure what changed.
I’m fine with it. It was always a bit weird having an extracurricular activity that was 99.5% primarily non-students over those 50 years. Not worth the liability.If true, what a horrible decision by the admin....
What about the band which has been half girls from Mags and Joe's for years or the majorettes that twirl the flags with them. I'm with Genco, bad decision! Have ALL the girls sign waivers that the school is not responsible if they are injured.I’m fine with it. It was always a bit weird having an extracurricular activity that was 99.5% primarily non-students over those 50 years. Not worth the liability.
Cough cough hate to be that guy but no outside the kids in band or their parents care at all ……. Honestly the band is embarrassingly small always has been.What about the band which has been half girls from Mags and Joe's for years or the majorettes that twirl the flags with them. I'm with Genco, bad decision! Have ALL the girls sign waivers that the school is not responsible if they are injured.
Mark of a good football team- small, embarrassing band.Cough cough hate to be that guy but no outside the kids in band or their parents care at all ……. Honestly the band is embarrassingly small always has been.
100% lately, I'm told, which I gather helped this decision along.I’m fine with it. It was always a bit weird having an extracurricular activity that was 99.5% primarily non-students over those 50 years. Not worth the liability.