y2h
Well-known member
Pulling something out of your @$$...hey that does sound like what the Dems did here.Is that what you do when you sneak a cell phone into the penitentiary?
Pulling something out of your @$$...hey that does sound like what the Dems did here.Is that what you do when you sneak a cell phone into the penitentiary?
This is true statement, to a limited extent but you are splitting hairs. Though, I don't believe AOC actually knows what RICO is or how it came about but she was schooled enough by someone on her staff to bait BobU into a response. She knew where he would go by the theatrics of repeating the question. He did hit the R but that has levels...his best response would have been to defer to attorneys to interpret the RICO law based on his testimony as neither he nor she is qualified to interpret the law. IMO, she lost it going off the rails about the Repubs impeachment process. She may have also considered the GA DA case against Trumpy and his conspirators with RICO violations...don't doubt the Trumpy attorneys will jump all over this. Bottom line, "don't go to court without an attorney" and she did as did BobU. Not a good look for congressperson that has a history of saying stupid shizz as he is just a witness that you either believe or don't, depending on the side of the fence you sit. She ceded the higher ground to make a point that came off badly.RICO is not a crime. LOL. It is a category of Federal laws. She was asking for the actual acts that constituted a breach of those laws and he could not name a single act. He is a much bigger blowhard. He was paid to lie and could not even do a good job at that.
I will defend her because she was 100% right about RICO and Boobinski was left looking like a blubbering fool.I wasn't talking about anyone else. I was talking about what that Marxist witch who made a fool out of herself said.
Now if you want to defend her, that's an appropriate response. Whataboutism is cheap rhetoric - a distraction and deflection. So, defend what she said. Good luck with that.
She asked for the acts that constituted a crime and he said RICO. LOL. You are defending a buffoon.You know you've hit rock bottom when you're forced to defend a brain dead idiot like AOC! lmao
Trump via Meadows.Who paid him?
What does the "R" IN RICO stand for?She asked for the acts that constituted a crime and he said RICO. LOL. You are defending a buffoon.
Trump via Meadows.
It's interesting that several of you make a bigger issue of how the questions are asked rather than the actual content of the responses or the witness's themselves. BoobU is a pissed off blowhard. He thinks he got screwed by Hunter so he ran to Team Trump and offered the "smoking gun" for some cash. This is a guy that sued his own father's charity for a million bucks. The problem is that there is no smoking gun. He has no real evidence. He refused to answer any questions with specifics because he was under oath and knew that he would perjure himself so he just mumbled broad generalities like RICO with no details supporting how anybody could possibly get there.This is true statement, to a limited extent but you are splitting hairs. Though, I don't believe AOC actually knows what RICO is or how it came about but she was schooled enough by someone on her staff to bait BobU into a response. She knew where he would go by the theatrics of repeating the question. He did hit the R but that has levels...his best response would have been to defer to attorneys to interpret the RICO law based on his testimony as neither he nor she is qualified to interpret the law. IMO, she lost it going off the rails about the Repubs impeachment process. She may have also considered the GA DA case against Trumpy and his conspirators with RICO violations...don't doubt the Trumpy attorneys will jump all over this. Bottom line, "don't go to court without an attorney" and she did as did BobU. Not a good look for congressperson that has a history of saying stupid shizz as he is just a witness that you either believe or don't, depending on the side of the fence you sit. She ceded the higher ground to make a point that came off badly.
In AOC understanding...an Old Fashioned is a mixed drink and not bourbon.
Look it up. 5 year olds can use google.What does the "R" IN RICO stand for?
I know what it is. Seems AOC doesn't.Look it up. 5 year olds can use google.
It's interesting that several of you make a bigger issue of how the questions are asked rather than the actual content of the responses or the witness's themselves. BoobU is a pissed off blowhard. He thinks he got screwed by Hunter so he ran to Team Trump and offered the "smoking gun" for some cash. This is a guy that sued his own father's charity for a million bucks. The problem is that there is no smoking gun. He has no real evidence. He refused to answer any questions with specifics because he was under oath and knew that he would perjure himself so he just mumbled broad generalities like RICO with no details supporting how anybody could possibly get there.
In MAGA understanding ... if you say somebody is guilty of stealing but cannot tell me what was stolen, when, and how, you are useless.
BTW - In BoobU's defense, he is the most credible witness they have. The other two are sitting in prison for a variety of crimes ranging from lying to the FBI to being Russian and Chinese assets. You could not have a bigger clownshow.
Isn't her actual degree in Interior Design or some such thing ? lolYour post "In MAGA understanding ... if you say somebody is guilty of stealing but cannot tell me what was stolen, when, and how, you are useless." This is a ridiculous statement, and you should know better. Just curious to how many convicted felonies take the stand as a prosecutor witness? Maybe you should tune in Dateline
BTW, you do know I kind of agreed with you...right? I have talked with an individual that studied under Professor Blakey at Notre Dame and their opinion is that he did not envision this statute to evolve the way that it has but AOC's take on it not being a crime is objectionable. Maybe your law degree can shed more light than her's.
Interior design, yeap, she can do that too. She's a badarse in heels that would make a liberal cry.Isn't her actual degree in Interior Design or some such thing ? lol
....not that there's anything wrong with that....for someone working in Interior Design.....
You do realize this clown show you speak of is being brough to you by passed business partners of Hunter, Jim and Joe if you want to be honest. how many times have we heard how Trump surrounded himself with criminals. Can I point out the above names Biden's seem to have that problem too.BTW - In BoobU's defense, he is the most credible witness they have. The other two are sitting in prison for a variety of crimes ranging from lying to the FBI to being Russian and Chinese assets. You could not have a bigger clownshow.
Actually, the dudes sitting in prison have bothering to do with the Hunter. They were never involved in any Hunter business. As for Booblinski, he was involved with Hunter for a period but Hunter was also high as hell on drugs so that might explain it. How do you explain the ecosystem of Trumps folks who have been convicted and jailed? Are you going to blame the adderall?You do realize this clown show you speak of is being brough to you by passed business partners of Hunter, Jim and Joe if you want to be honest. how many times have we heard how Trump surrounded himself with criminals. Can I point out the above names Biden's seem to have that problem too.
All that I can be sure of is that if she was wearing a short skirt and a thong, she got some excellent tips, reaching for the top shelf liquor back when she was a Brooklyn bartender. That was 10 years ago. People would still pay to see that even if she had a bag over her head and they didn’t know who she was.Interior design, yeap, she can do that too. She's a badarse in heels that would make a liberal cry.
I'm just waiting for him to Google Blakey.
LOL, what Brien?Actually, the dudes sitting in prison have bothering to do with the Hunter.
"ecosystem of Trumps folks" WTF is that? Are you trying to Wiki a term for Mike Moore to use?Actually, the dudes sitting in prison have bothering to do with the Hunter. They were never involved in any Hunter business. As for Booblinski, he was involved with Hunter for a period but Hunter was also high as hell on drugs so that might explain it. How do you explain the ecosystem of Trumps folks who have been convicted and jailed? Are you going to blame the adderall?
People that work directly for him."ecosystem of Trumps folks" WTF is that? Are you trying to Wiki a term for Mike Moore to use?
Drugs seem to be a defense...right?
Not yet. That coming in Georgia.RICO....?
Hmmm....not with the AOC statement...RICO ain't a crime.Not yet. That coming in Georgia.
AOC is not a prosecutor. She is a house rep from Brooklyn. I don't care.Hmmm....not with the AOC statement
She just thinks she is.AOC is not a prosecutor. She is a house rep from Brooklyn. I don't care.
They kind of all do in that situation. Is that news to you?She just thinks she is.
True, but some people believe she achieved some "gotcha moment."They kind of all do in that situation. Is that news to you?
Great reply...16+ years of education led you to that response. However, you may want to care someday but I understand. A good pacifist will always stand behind those that fight for you.AOC is not a prosecutor. She is a house rep from Brooklyn. I don't care.
I would not have called it a gotcha but she did expose Booblinski as a fraud. He has yet to detail the actual crime.True, but some people believe she achieved some "gotcha moment."
Why should I care how a house rep in NY questions a witness. Outside of the entertainment value, it is not material to me.Great reply...16+ years of education led you to that response. However, you may want to care someday but I understand. A good pacifist will always stand behind those that fight for you.
Racketeering is an actual crime. If he would have given her a detail she is so stupid she would have fumbled it.I would not have called it a gotcha but she did expose Booblinski as a fraud. He has yet to detail the actual crime.
How come he has not given the detail to those brilliant bumbling twins ... Gomer and Gym?Racketeering is an actual crime. If he would have given her a detail she is so stupid she would have fumbled it.