Baldwin-Wallace Poll on Issue 1 (abortion rights) in Ohio. It leads, 58–34%

ProV1 said:
All you have Dione ion this thread is lie.
Click to expand...
Dionne Warwick GIF by The Ed Sullivan Show
 
Redandgold said:
Read the Issue. It plainly says that the government may prohibit abortions if fetal viability is determined to exist by a doctor, unless a doctor says the mother’s life is in jeopardy. Fetal viability means that a doctor judges that the fetus is developed to the point it could live outside the womb. Stop talking out of your arse.
Click to expand...
"May" is not "will" so it may be prohibited and it just as likely may not, there is ZERO assurance anywhere in this amendment that there would be any limitations to fetal viability if it passes.

IF that "may" would turn into a "will" then it also explicitly states that fetal viability is at the judgement of the treating physician, whom can be the physician at the abortion clinic. And there is no accountability for their judgement call regardless because the amendment also relieves everyone of liability at any point "The State shall not, directly or indirectly, burden, penalize, prohibit, interfere with, or discriminate against a person or entity that assists with an individual exercising this right...
 
ProV1 said:
Man has zero say. You give a woman your junk and she does with it what she pleases. No different than when you give her your money. You may suggest what she buys but she will always get what she wants with the dough. It is what you agree to up front.
Click to expand...
You must be a great dad.
 
ProV1 said:
We also have doctors that prescribe opioids when they should not knowing they are abused but we don't stop all doctors from prescribing drugs because of that.
Click to expand...
There are restrictions on prescriptions.
 
ProV1 said:
I have never justified anything of the sort. You just made that up. I have simply said the government needs to stay out personal and medical decisions for women including those about reproduction.
Click to expand...
It's not only about the woman, there is another life involved.
 
ProV1 said:
LOL. A euphemism? It’s the exact definition of the word …abortion.

Again, nobody wants your opinion of what constitutes life.
Click to expand...
It's not opinion, it's science...but we aren't trusting the science anymore apparently.
 
kyles_mom said:
You must be a great dad.
Click to expand...
Man has zero say. You give a woman your junk and she does with it what she pleases. No different than when you give her your money. You may suggest what she buys but she will always get what she wants with the dough. It is what you agree to up front.

ProV1 is the very example of the cuck simp feminized male that is leading this nation to its down fall.
The above statement from this cuck is perfect.
 
y2h said:
So we are trusting abortion doctors to act ethically regarding viability?
Click to expand...
Trust is not part of this equation unless you are the patient. I don‘t need or want your trust of my doctor. Actually now that I think about it, I would change doctors if you trusted mine.
 
y2h said:
There are restrictions on prescriptions.
Click to expand...
Sure. And there could be restrictions on abortion. That is a separate issue. This is like the right to free speech. It is not unlimited and is restricted by law.
 
y2h said:
It's not only about the woman, there is another life involved.
Click to expand...
One could argue it is also about another life at some point. That said, that question is the basis for all kinds of illogical arguments that do not need to be injected into a woman's right to make a reproductive decision.
 
m14brian said:
Man has zero say. You give a woman your junk and she does with it what she pleases. No different than when you give her your money. You may suggest what she buys but she will always get what she wants with the dough. It is what you agree to up front.

ProV1 is the very example of the cuck simp feminized male that is leading this nation to its down fall.
The above statement from this cuck is perfect.
Click to expand...
A woman can get a legal abortion without the man’s permission. He has no say in the decision. Anybody who thinks that the man should have to give permission for a woman to have an abortion is a scumbag. Thank God we don’t live in a country that still treats woman that way.
 
BlackandGold said:
Your insurance company is part of the healthcare system. Believe it or not, it’s part of the checks and balances for making sure you’re not paying for an expensive test your son didn’t need…by physicians.
Click to expand...
It was more than a test it was knee surgery so he could walk and run again.
 
ProV1 said:
Sure. And there could be restrictions on abortion. That is a separate issue. This is like the right to free speech. It is not unlimited and is restricted by law.
Click to expand...
The left doesn't want restrictions...my body, my choice up to the moment of birth.
 
ProV1 said:
Trust is not part of this equation unless you are the patient. I don‘t need or want your trust of my doctor. Actually now that I think about it, I would change doctors if you trusted mine.
Click to expand...
Of course trust is part of the equation as codified in the law...leaving viability for late term abortion up to the abortion provider...the law implicitly trusts them to make an ethical decision. Who's turning away a paying customer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top