In theory it works, but that model was attempted in all sports in NEO with the 18 team NOC and it was a disaster. The league lasted longer than it probably should have. It didn’t matter as much in other sports, and perhaps it’s more possible with football now that the playoff is expanding, but for those teams that are smaller schools but successful, it’s a huge issue.
Going back to the NOC, you always had four schools consistently in the top division: Mentor, Solon, Strongsville, Brunswick. The last two spots were transition spots, and there became five schools that did everything in their power to avoid staying in the middle division: Hudson, Twinsburg, Medina, Stow, Mayfield. It ended up destroying the league because teams didn’t want to play up. Some were legit (Mayfield and Twinsburg had some very good teams, but were small schools and very class dependent), and some were not (Stow and Medina were two of the biggest schools in the league, they just couldn’t get their programs off the ground at that time).
This eventually led to the formation of the current two division Suburban League and the Greater Cleveland Conference.
One of the other huge issues with relegation is that it makes it much more difficult to schedule your non conference games. If I’m a Southview, Clay or a BG and I’m one of the schools that could potentially fluctuate, who I schedule non-league is heavily dependent on which division I’m in for that year.
Makes sense...although, wouldn't a model like that work in every sport BUT the sport that does things in such a cockamemie way that 10-0 teams can't compete for a state title?
Keep football beholden to enrollment and make every other sport a pro/rel? Sounds like a solid way to ensure teams maintain some level of competition in all sports.