Sure it is.Law enforcement relying on private donations to fund rewards is not a great law enforcement strategy.
It is quite common.
Sure it is.Law enforcement relying on private donations to fund rewards is not a great law enforcement strategy.
He is. He's using Reward money to find the perps.
The two are not even remotely related incidents.Yes. Guy won't even hold his own officers responsible but wants to be a media darling and call out LeBron publicly instead of doing his job.
I don't know about common. It's not unusual, but not common.Sure it is.
It is quite common.
Sure, but I'm sure he'd want to make sure people know he's doing it for them and not because the sheriff asked, though. At the same time, I'm not sure anyone else is bringing this up if the sheriff doesn't ignorantly 'challenge' him to donate.LeBron could still support the shot deputies by offering part of the reward and not support the sheriff, right?
You don't think pissing off the family of an NBA star and then calling out another NBA star aren't related?The two are not even remotely related incidents.
The incidents aren't, but, now that the sheriff has called LeBron out, the people "involved" in both incidents are related to both.The two are not even remotely related incidents.
That was my point. NBA stars are a pretty closed circle/network. The sheriff's mishandling of the Kobe incident is clearly going to influence how other NBA stars are going to react to this sheriff.The incidents aren't, but, now that the sheriff has called LeBron out, the people "involved" in both incidents are related to both.
Especially ones living in the same town, who were friends and are dealing with the same sheriff.You don't think pissing off the family of an NBA star and then calling out another NBA star aren't related?
Seems kind of petty of the stars, don't you think?That was my point. NBA stars are a pretty closed circle/network. The sheriff's mishandling of the Kobe incident is clearly going to influence how other NBA stars are going to react to this sheriff.
Seems kind of bush league by the sheriff, don't you think?Seems kind of petty of the stars, don't you think?
I guess I'm not familiar with what he did wrt Kobe. But to not want to help out in this situation, because of whatever happened, would be immature and petty. But then, Lebron has been almost completely uninformed about all of this stuff, and the stances he has taken for criminals are really not defensible. So I'm not surprised he wouldn't help out here.Seems kind of bush league by the sheriff, don't you think?
I don't necessarily think it's petty not to trust this sheriff based on his previous actions.
Ask yourself, if this sheriff/department handled an incident involving your family or friends the way they did the Kobe incident, would you be super excited to want to respond to his requests?I guess I'm not familiar with what he did wrt Kobe. But to not want to help out in this situation, because of whatever happened, would be immature and petty. But then, Lebron has been almost completely uninformed about all of this stuff, and the stances he has taken for criminals are really not defensible. So I'm not surprised he wouldn't help out here.
Actually I would look at it as an opportunity to show how much of a bigger person I am. I'm not sure what is so hard to understand here. Put petty difference aside and step in to help out.Ask yourself, if this sheriff/department handled an incident involving your family or friends the way they did the Kobe incident, would you be super excited to want to respond to his requests?
Sure, he can still do that.Wait. So he shouldn't just shut up and dribble then? Which is it?
I highly doubt that.Actually I would look at it as an opportunity to show how much of a bigger person I am. I'm not sure what is so hard to understand here. Put petty difference aside and step in to help out.
It is sort of like saying. "Hey, we have noticed that you like to be involved, based on your public statements. How about helping us out with this very public shooting."Wait. So he shouldn't just shut up and dribble then? Which is it?
In certain communities, yes.Is there a shortage of people expressing support for law enforcement?
LeBron putting up additional reward money should have zero impact on whether this sheriff solves this case.
LOL, "you highly doubt that" That is hilarious.I highly doubt that.
There's also no shortage of support, monetarily and otherwise, for this case. LeBron's involvement will have zero impact on the case being solved. This was a media grab by the sheriff, who should be focusing on doing his job and better overseeing his officers.
There's already a reward being offered. The law of diminishing returns applies here. The difference between $200k and $300k or $400k will be pretty minimal.LOL, "you highly doubt that" That is hilarious.
To suggest that it would have zero impact, would only be true if offering rewards doesn't help solve crimes. And if it doesn't, I would have to ask why police departments waste their time doing so.
A simple statement to the fact he is against violence against LEO would help when he offers up part of the reward. Clearly state that is the reason and we should all want an end to these situations. If he wants to trash the sheriff at the same time, go ahead. I would advise him to take the high road.Sure, but I'm sure he'd want to make sure people know he's doing it for them and not because the sheriff asked, though. At the same time, I'm not sure anyone else is bringing this up if the sheriff doesn't ignorantly 'challenge' him to donate.
So, we're holding a private citizen to a higher standard than a law enforcement official?A simple statement to the fact he is against violence against LEO would help when he offers up part of the reward. Clearly state that is the reason and we should all want an end to these situations. If he wants to trash the sheriff at the same time, go ahead. I would advise him to take the high road.
Really, the law of diminishing returns. I have to assume that the people who would know something about the person who did this, might disagree with you. You see, it isn't likely that they would agree with your sentiment that doubling the reward isn't significant. And additional $100,000 dollars wouldn't be insignificant in their life.There's already a reward being offered. The law of diminishing returns applies here. The difference between $200k and $300k or $400k will be pretty minimal.
Also, I've heard from friends in law enforcement that rewards are often a mixed bag. Maybe you get a lead that proves to be helpful, but they also get a ton of unreliable, unqualified leads from people hoping to cash in that they then have to waste time and resources on. At some level, the reward strategy is a PR move by local law enforcement to create the impression they are doing "something" and alleviate public criticism.
I think the person or persons with legitimate information would share it for $200k just as readily as they would for $300k. The difference between $10k and $200k is probably significant enough to matter but not at this level. Again, due to diminishing returns, you're probably only getting additional unreliable/dead-end leads that burn up department resources by adding more money to the reward amount at this point.Really, the law of diminishing returns. I have to assume that the people who would know something about the person who did this, might disagree with you. You see, it isn't likely that they would agree with your sentiment that doubling the reward isn't significant. And additional $100,000 dollars wouldn't be insignificant in their life.
You could be right. But we have wandered a bit off subject here. We have gone from discussing if the Sheriff should ask Lebron for help, to what he is asking, isn't going to help anyway. I'm sure Lebron could figure out someway to help out.I think the person or persons with legitimate information would share it for $200k just as readily as they would for $300k. The difference between $10k and $200k is probably significant enough to matter but not at this level. Again, due to diminishing returns, you're probably only getting additional unreliable/dead-end leads that burn up department resources by adding more money to the reward amount at this point.