What about the peaceful transition?

[Guillotine]

Wait... did you say felony?

I meant a real one, not the manufactured one you're wanting so badly to sneak in.

 

[fish82]

Come talk to me when Biden or Kamala incite a riot and try to keep Trump for holding the office of President. All were legit elections. I just can’t get past how the working class believes a fake billionaire who nominates his billionaire buddies is the answer to the woes of the working class. He legit called us “the herd” when talking about herd immunity. Whether you agree with the science of how herd immunity works or not, calling the working class a f-ing herd should tell you all you need to know about how the folks in his circle view us.

He is putting Elon Musk in a position of power. He named it the Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE. What is Elon a major stakeholder in???? F-ing dogecoin, DOGE If you’re one who pays attention to that sort of thing.

Anyways, I’m off topic. The Biden admin are cooperative in the peaceful transfer of power. This is just a “woe is me” attempt to suggest otherwise.

No one ever bothers to mention that you people literally set downtown DC on fire during Drumpf’s 2017 inauguration. lol.

 

[underthelights]

1A: everyone has equality in 2024. Any narrative that says otherwise is propaganda. 1B: what happened at the Capitol has been criticized by conservatives from the moment it happened.

The election itself was dubious.

When buildings are burning down in the background it's not a "mostly peaceful " protest. When police stations and federal buildings were under attack from BLM/Antifa I don't remember an insurrection narrative from the media. Only when it's alleged right wingers it becomes a narrative.

Oh, bless your heart! It seems we've found the one person in 2024 who thinks everyone is living their best life, equal and free... like they've just stepped out of a time machine from 1950. America must be great again. I mean, if equality were any more universal, we’d expect to find unicorns in every neighborhood park! You might want to check the news a little more often; it turns out that not everyone's living in a propaganda free utopia, and pretending otherwise is a bold strategy.

As for your take on the Capitol insurrection, it’s cute how you think criticism from conservatives is a rare commodity, like trying to find a needle in a haystack full of disgruntled Facebook commenters. When it’s your own team storming the castle, you’d think they’d have brought along a “No Insurrection Zone” sign. It’s like they thought they could deliver a sports highlight reel instead of holding an actual democratic process.

And about the Black Lives Matter protests? Calling them criminal is a bit rich. I mean, didn’t you see that they were just trying to start a bonfire and forgot the s’mores? Sure, there were some unruly moments, but let’s not pretend every significant social movement has been as orderly as a middle school field trip.

As for the media, oh boy, give them some credit for their talent, especially considering the right wing view of them as "Fake News!" They can turn a peaceful protest into a full-blown disaster movie faster than you can say, “Breaking News!” But I guess when it comes to making comparisons, you might prefer your own version of reality, where everything fits neatly into a box like that perfect pair of socks you’re dreaming about. I'll call that Fox News.

So, keep on living in that delightful world where everyone’s equal and every narrative is as clear as the instructions on a ready-to-assemble IKEA shelf. Just remember, reality has a way of sneaking up on you, and it might not be as tidy as you’d hoped...


Obviously, I'm being satirical, but come on man.

 

[underthelights]

No one ever bothers to mention that you people literally set downtown DC on fire during Drumpf’s 2017 inauguration. lol.

Dusting off the old “Whataboutism” playbook...classic! It’s like the Swiss army knife of arguments, always ready to pull out an equally disgusting moment. Setting downtown DC on fire during Trump’s inauguration? Now that’s a throwback!

But let’s be real for a second. If we’re going to discuss incidents from the past, we should aim to learn from them rather than just keep score like it’s a bizarre game of political bingo. Sure, that incident happened, and it was wrong, but shifting the focus to that just to downplay current events is like saying, “Well, I once got a speeding ticket, so my friend can totally ignore the stop sign!”

At some point, we all have to agree that whether we’re talking about an inauguration or protests, the goal should be progress, not chaos for chaos’s sake. Unfortunately, history has its way of repeating itself, but let’s hope that next time it’s at least a little less flammable.

 

[Steel Valley FB]

Oh, bless your heart! It seems we've found the one person in 2024 who thinks everyone is living their best life, equal and free... like they've just stepped out of a time machine from 1950. America must be great again. I mean, if equality were any more universal, we’d expect to find unicorns in every neighborhood park! You might want to check the news a little more often; it turns out that not everyone's living in a propaganda free utopia, and pretending otherwise is a bold strategy.

As for your take on the Capitol insurrection, it’s cute how you think criticism from conservatives is a rare commodity, like trying to find a needle in a haystack full of disgruntled Facebook commenters. When it’s your own team storming the castle, you’d think they’d have brought along a “No Insurrection Zone” sign. It’s like they thought they could deliver a sports highlight reel instead of holding an actual democratic process.

And about the Black Lives Matter protests? Calling them criminal is a bit rich. I mean, didn’t you see that they were just trying to start a bonfire and forgot the s’mores? Sure, there were some unruly moments, but let’s not pretend every significant social movement has been as orderly as a middle school field trip.

As for the media, oh boy, give them some credit for their talent, especially considering the right wing view of them as "Fake News!" They can turn a peaceful protest into a full-blown disaster movie faster than you can say, “Breaking News!” But I guess when it comes to making comparisons, you might prefer your own version of reality, where everything fits neatly into a box like that perfect pair of socks you’re dreaming about. I'll call that Fox News.

So, keep on living in that delightful world where everyone’s equal and every narrative is as clear as the instructions on a ready-to-assemble IKEA shelf. Just remember, reality has a way of sneaking up on you, and it might not be as tidy as you’d hoped...


Obviously, I'm being satirical, but come on man.

Everyone is equal. What creates disparity are the life choices people make and the work ethic they possess. Equal opportunity doesn’t necessarily mean equal outcome. If someone doesn’t have as much wealth as me and I don’t have as much wealth as another guy, it’s almost always a result of the relative life choices made, and the work ethic had, by each of us. It’s almost never society’s fault.

 

[underthelights]

I meant a real one, not the manufactured one you're wanting so badly to sneak in.

Yes, a real one. Because lying about a BJ when it's embarrassingly brought out in court proceedings for the whole world to see is much worse than falsifying business records related to his financial dealings, including inflated asset values for loans and insurance, mishandling classified documents after leaving office, obstructing justice during the investigation and efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, involving various illegal actions aimed at influencing the electoral process.

Regarding felony convictions, Clinton was never convicted of a felony in connection to the impeachment or the underlying issues. He was disbarred from practicing law in Arkansas and fined for lying under oath to a grand jury, but these actions did not result in a felony conviction. So, while his presidency was marred by scandal and legal battles, he did not face felony charges that resulted in a conviction.

So in regards to your post, the "real one" you speak of actually belongs to Trump.

 

[underthelights]

Everyone is equal. What creates disparity are the life choices people make and the work ethic they possess. Equal opportunity doesn’t necessarily mean equal outcome. If someone doesn’t have as much wealth as me and I don’t have as much wealth as another guy, it’s almost always a result of the relative life choices made, and the work ethic had, by each of us. It’s almost never society’s fault.

While personal responsibility and choices definitely play significant roles in an individual's success, it’s important to recognize that the playing field isn’t always level for everyone. Since the BLM has been beaten to death here, take a look at many of America's Native American Reservations. For example, Standing Rock Reservation has an 85-90% unemployment rate. Are you suggesting that almost everyone there is equal to you, but is just lazy and doesn't have your work ethic? Or are you simply smarter than everyone else there? ...or is it partly due because they're stuck in an isolated area intentionally held down due to systematic oppression and racism? ...or does it meet somewhere in the middle? To suggest they have had equal opportunities to either of us is laughable and illustrates your lack real world perspective.

Consider that some people face obstacles that others might not even see. Factors like access to quality education, healthcare, socioeconomic background, and even systemic biases can all impact one’s opportunities, regardless of their work ethic.

So while it’s true that life choices are crucial, it’s also essential to acknowledge that not everyone starts the race from the same line, and sometimes the hurdles placed in front of people aren’t of their making. It’s all part of a larger conversation about creating a society that fosters both opportunity and support for everyone, so we can work toward more equitable outcomes together. We want to encourage hard work, but let’s also make sure not to ignore the systems that can hold people back. Look at us both sound utopian.

 

[MoeDude]

If the D’s were to do that on J6, 2025 would you feel the same? I do not believe you would. If D’s were to do on J6, 2025 was MAGA did on J6, 2020, I would want far more than just one ‘Ashley’ shot. It was a fair & just election in 2020 & 2024.

The D’s have been harassing Conservatives and Republicans for years. You had and have Dems in DC telling people to confront Republicans. It amazing to me how all you got is January 6th and yet open protests in Kavanaugh’s front yard, chasing Republicans out of restaurants, shooting a Republican at a charity softball practice, two attempts on Trumps life, threats against Trump cabinet appointees and on and on and you’re obsessed with January 6th. They should not have stormed the Capitol but what happened that one day pails when you look at everything the Left has been doing ever since Obama was elected.

 

[JUSTGOPLAY]

Seagulls are known to swoop in where they have nothing to offer, dump excrement all over the place, then leave.

Yeah, but them seagulls probably don't use as many words to dump their excrement as this underthelights person. I mean this dudes rambling word salads rival anything that Cackling Imbecile ever spewed, and are about as relevant.

 

[winbypin]

Nixon & Watergate could definitely be argued as a worse self inflicted event but it was over a period of time, the worse self inflicted day in my opinion was J6.

Not sure what you are referring to regard Bill. Getting a BJ and not admitting to it is far from a Watergate or J6.

J6 was such a bad, self-inflicted event it kept Trump from winning the election in dramatic fashion.

Lol

 

[BGFalcons82]

Yeah, but them seagulls probably don't use as many words to dump their excrement as this underthelights person. I mean this dudes rambling word salads rival anything that Cackling Imbecile ever spewed, and are about as relevant.

I can’t recall any significant posts over the past year or so from the seagull. It’s got TDS and provides a shat-athon for regular posters.

 

[underthelights]

Yeah, but them seagulls probably don't use as many words to dump their excrement as this underthelights person. I mean this dudes rambling word salads rival anything that Cackling Imbecile ever spewed, and are about as relevant.

I guess it's easier to spew insults than reply in an intelligent manner. I get it... your comprehension skills are low.

 

[JUSTGOPLAY]

I can’t recall any significant posts over the past year or so from the seagull. It’s got TDS and provides a shat-athon for regular posters.

That TDS is debilitating, and strikes without warning. Maybe the Leftists can get that numbnut Fauci to stop counting his Pfizer money long enough to cook up a couple of batches of vaccine to cure TDS......Now that would be a scientific breakthrough.

 

[underthelights]

That TDS is debilitating, and strikes without warning. Maybe the Leftists can get that numbnut Fauci to stop counting his Pfizer money long enough to cook up a couple of batches of vaccine to cure TDS......Now that would be a scientific breakthrough.

Yes, now huddle up together and cuddle with your fellow internet tough guy. Maybe together you IQ scores will equal out to over 100. The likelihood is that I've voted for more republicans than both of you in my lifetime. I'm just not so blinded by propaganda that I'm willing to continue to vote for candidates that hypocritically claim to stand for what I do while simultaneously acting in a manner that goes against my moral values and my own economic interests.

 

[Summa]

Yes, now huddle up together and cuddle with your fellow internet tough guy. Maybe together you IQ scores will equal out to over 100. The likelihood is that I've voted for more republicans than both of you in my lifetime. I'm just not so blinded by propaganda that I'm willing to continue to vote for candidates that hypocritically claim to stand for what I do while simultaneously acting in a manner that goes against my moral values and my own economic interests.

You ladies are going to need to pace yourselves or you aren’t going to make it through the next 1,500+ days.

 

[fish82]

Dusting off the old “Whataboutism” playbook...classic! It’s like the Swiss army knife of arguments, always ready to pull out an equally disgusting moment. Setting downtown DC on fire during Trump’s inauguration? Now that’s a throwback!

But let’s be real for a second. If we’re going to discuss incidents from the past, we should aim to learn from them rather than just keep score like it’s a bizarre game of political bingo. Sure, that incident happened, and it was wrong, but shifting the focus to that just to downplay current events is like saying, “Well, I once got a speeding ticket, so my friend can totally ignore the stop sign!”

At some point, we all have to agree that whether we’re talking about an inauguration or protests, the goal should be progress, not chaos for chaos’s sake. Unfortunately, history has its way of repeating itself, but let’s hope that next time it’s at least a little less flammable.

lol

 

[JUSTGOPLAY]

You ladies are going to need to pace yourselves or you aren’t going to make it through the next 1,500+ days.

Wait til that Big Orange SOB starts rounding up them 15 million third world illegals the Leftists smuggled into the country, and shipping them to that 1400 acre detention center in Texas...... The sky screaming is gonna' be epic.

 

[Guillotine]

Yes, a real one. Because lying about a BJ when it's embarrassingly brought out in court proceedings for the whole world to see is much worse than falsifying business records related to his financial dealings, including inflated asset values for loans and insurance, mishandling classified documents after leaving office, obstructing justice during the investigation and efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, involving various illegal actions aimed at influencing the electoral process.

Agreed. Adultery with a young subordinate in the workplace is not only reprehensible, but it would also get you fired at 100% of the largest corporations in America. And just to top it off, President Stainmaker doubled down on setting up the inevitable blackmail opportunity by staring us in the eye, wagging his finger in our face, and demanding we believe his lies. Of course, the phony manufactured, and statue tortured charges levied against President Trump will be reversed on appeal as every legal scholar on the planet recognizes political lawfare when they see it.

Regarding felony convictions, Clinton was never convicted of a felony in connection to the impeachment or the underlying issues. He was disbarred from practicing law in Arkansas and fined for lying under oath to a grand jury, but these actions did not result in a felony conviction. So, while his presidency was marred by scandal and legal battles, he did not face felony charges that resulted in a conviction.

Agreed. Lying under oath to a grand jury is the textbook definition of perjury so he absolutely got away with one.

So in regards to your post, the "real one" you speak of actually belongs to Trump.

Nonsense bordering on abject stupidity. You were killing it up until that point. lmao

 

[Summa]

Wait til that Big Orange SOB starts rounding up them 15 million third world illegals the Leftists smuggled into the country, and shipping them to that 1400 acre detention center in Texas...... The sky screaming is gonna' be epic.

Yes, but no outrage by the left for all the women and children horribly abused by the cartels in the human trafficking trade directly resulting from the international open boarder policy of the current administration that enriched the cartels significantly more than even the lucrative drug trade.

 

[underthelights]

Agreed. Adultery with a young subordinate in the workplace is not only reprehensible, but it would also get you fired at 100% of the largest corporations in America. And just to top it off, President Stainmaker doubled down on setting up the inevitable blackmail opportunity by staring us in the eye, wagging his finger in our face, and demanding we believe his lies. Of course, the phony manufactured, and statue tortured charges levied against President Trump will be reversed on appeal as every legal scholar on the planet recognizes political lawfare when they see it.




Agreed. Lying under oath to a grand jury is the textbook definition of perjury so he absolutely got away with one.



Nonsense bordering on abject stupidity. You were killing it up until that point. lmao

You know, it’s almost comical how some folks defend Trump as if he’s the last bastion of truth in a world full of lies. It’s like cheering for a contestant on a reality show who’s lost touch with reality; just because you give him a rose doesn’t mean he’s the best option out there.

Let’s get real here: when it comes to lying under oath about a personal affair, that’s one thing. Terrible and a complete violation to his wife's trust (assuming she even truly cared), but trying to undermine democracy and manipulate financial records is in a league of its own. Maybe instead of fawning over the antics, we should be focusing on the elephant sized issues that actually matter. Clinton getting a BJ in the oval office did not change my life one bit. I mean, I hate to bring it up, but aren't there multiple instances of Trump having similar behavior? Those also don't have anything to do with my life, but if we're splitting hairs...

And this whole “political lawfare” narrative? Come on! It’s like wearing a “Fight Club” t-shirt without ever having read the book. Claiming that all these serious legal troubles are just a witch hunt is a classic case of bending reality to fit a narrative.

Keep waving that flag for your reality TV star if that makes you feel special, but I’ll stick with the facts. At the end of the day, it’s important to recognize what’s truly at stake rather than getting wrapped up in the smoke and mirrors. I'd prefer to focus on accountability while others are busy making excuses.

 

[Guillotine]

You know, it’s almost comical how some folks defend Trump as if he’s the last bastion of truth in a world full of lies. It’s like cheering for a contestant on a reality show who’s lost touch with reality; just because you give him a rose doesn’t mean he’s the best option out there.

Your disdain for the majority of American voters is noted. As is your newfound coping mechanism. lol

Let’s get real here: when it comes to lying under oath about a personal affair, that’s one thing. Terrible and a complete violation to his wife's trust (assuming she even truly cared), but trying to undermine democracy and manipulate financial records is in a league of its own.

That's hilarious. And I've already explained why.

And this whole “political lawfare” narrative? Come on! It’s like wearing a “Fight Club” t-shirt without ever having read the book. Claiming that all these serious legal troubles are just a witch hunt is a classic case of bending reality to fit a narrative.

lol What?

These "serious legal troubles" you speak of just went poof. Obviously, like you, they aren't that serious.

Keep waving that flag for your reality TV star if that makes you feel special, but I’ll stick with the facts.

Your "facts" are subjective, but your faith in them is what gives me the belly laugh!

At the end of the day, it’s important to recognize what’s truly at stake rather than getting wrapped up in the smoke and mirrors. I'd prefer to focus on accountability while others are busy making excuses.

I haven't made any excuses, and we settled the "what's truly at stake" argument two weeks ago.

You lost. btw

 

[underthelights]

Your disdain for the majority of American voters is noted. As is your newfound coping mechanism. lol



That's hilarious. And I've already explained why.




lol What?

These "serious legal troubles" you speak of just went poof. Obviously, like you, they aren't that serious.



Your "facts" are subjective, but your faith in them is what gives me the belly laugh!



I haven't made any excuses, and we settled the "what's truly at stake" argument two weeks ago.

You lost. btw

You know, it’s truly remarkable how you manage to twist every point I make into some kind of jab at American voters. It’s almost pristine in its execution! But here’s the thing: my critique isn’t about the voters; it’s about the danger of blindly supporting someone without examining the whole picture.

Regarding those “serious legal troubles,” can we please address the fact that just wishing them away doesn’t actually make them go poof? It’s like blowing out candles and hoping the cake doesn’t exist anymore...nice try, but we’re still having dessert over here!

And yes, my facts may seem subjective to you, but that’s part of engaging in any discussion. Everyone has a perspective, and I’m simply voicing mine, which you seem to find hilariously unbearable. That’s your cue to rethink your own perspective, not dismiss mine.

If you think you’ve "won" the argument just because you’ve got a clever comeback, then I’d say we’re in different arenas. I’m here for the dialogue, and you’re off in your own comedic delusional reality. Keep those laughs coming; it just highlights how disconnected the reality you’re embracing really is.

Let’s keep this going! Your attempts to deflect show that instead of building a solid argument, you’re just stacking up punchlines. Entertaining, but not exactly convincing.

 

[Guillotine]

You know, it’s truly remarkable how you manage to twist every point I make into some kind of jab at American voters. It’s almost pristine in its execution!

I did it once.

But here’s the thing: my critique isn’t about the voters; it’s about the danger of blindly supporting someone without examining the whole picture.

A distinction without a difference.

Regarding those “serious legal troubles,” can we please address the fact that just wishing them away doesn’t actually make them go poof? It’s like blowing out candles and hoping the cake doesn’t exist anymore...nice try, but we’re still having dessert over here!

Exactly which one is still "serious?"

And yes, my facts may seem subjective to you, but that’s part of engaging in any discussion. Everyone has a perspective, and I’m simply voicing mine, which you seem to find hilariously unbearable. That’s your cue to rethink your own perspective, not dismiss mine.

I think you're an arrogant snot, just like the vast majority of liberals.

If you think you’ve "won" the argument just because you’ve got a clever comeback, then I’d say we’re in different arenas. I’m here for the dialogue, and you’re off in your own comedic delusional reality. Keep those laughs coming; it just highlights how disconnected the reality you’re embracing really is.

I said my ideology and understanding of "what's truly at stake" just won an election AND an argument.

Which is 100% true.

Let’s keep this going! Your attempts to deflect show that instead of building a solid argument, you’re just stacking up punchlines. Entertaining, but not exactly convincing.

Okay.

 

[underthelights]

Oh, so now we’re counting? Just one twisted point?

Now, regarding those “serious legal troubles,” let’s get specific. We've heard them all before but it seems you're having a hard time acknowledging them. Trump is currently facing multiple legal challenges, including:

1. Civil Fraud Case: The New York Attorney General's office found that Trump and his companies inflated asset values to secure favorable loans and insurance rates, resulting in a civil lawsuit that could ultimately cost him billions. This isn’t just a slap on the wrist; it’s a major blow to his business empire.
2. Classified Documents Case: After leaving office, Trump was indicted for allegedly mishandling classified documents, including top-secret materials. This is serious, as it involves national security and could lead to significant legal repercussions.
3. Election Interference Charges: Trump has faced legal scrutiny related to his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. This includes charges of conspiracy and solicitation to commit election fraud, which put a spotlight on potential threats to democratic processes.
4. January 6th Insurrection: He faces allegations of inciting the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol, which resulted in deaths and severe injury to law enforcement, further complicating his legal landscape.

Here's a link for you if you'd like to track his legal issues. (I'm aware politico tends to lean to the left, but they put it in list format, and considering your comprehension issues, I figured that would be easiest for you) https://www.politico.com/interactives/2023/trump-criminal-investigations-cases-tracker-list/

I didn't even say anything about porn stars... I deserve to be applauded for keeping it high brow at the very least.

So, if you're asking me which of these are “serious,” I’d say all of them are. They aren’t just noise; they represent significant legal troubles that could lead to real consequences.

And calling me an arrogant snot? That’s rich. It’s always entertaining when the ones who throw around insults, whose ideologies are rooted in division, suddenly start playing the victim card. But hey, if it brings you comfort, who am I to disrupt your little echo chamber?

As for winning an election: yeah, I can admit that the election was legitimate and wasn't the outcome I wanted. So, kudos to you! Can your desired candidate say the same thing about the 2020 election? And winning isn’t the end-all be-all. It’s about the bigger picture, the values, and the implications of those victories. It’s not just about the immediate win; it’s how those results will affect our collective future. I'm hoping they will be minimal.

Anyways, let’s keep this lively back and forth going. Your punchlines might be entertaining, but if they don’t address the core issues, they’re just a distraction from the real issues that, based on you're replies, you are not well versed on.

 

[lchsman]

Oh, so now we’re counting? Just one twisted point?

Now, regarding those “serious legal troubles,” let’s get specific. We've heard them all before but it seems you're having a hard time acknowledging them. Trump is currently facing multiple legal challenges, including:

1. Civil Fraud Case: The New York Attorney General's office found that Trump and his companies inflated asset values to secure favorable loans and insurance rates, resulting in a civil lawsuit that could ultimately cost him billions. This isn’t just a slap on the wrist; it’s a major blow to his business empire.
2. Classified Documents Case: After leaving office, Trump was indicted for allegedly mishandling classified documents, including top-secret materials. This is serious, as it involves national security and could lead to significant legal repercussions.
3. Election Interference Charges: Trump has faced legal scrutiny related to his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. This includes charges of conspiracy and solicitation to commit election fraud, which put a spotlight on potential threats to democratic processes.
4. January 6th Insurrection: He faces allegations of inciting the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol, which resulted in deaths and severe injury to law enforcement, further complicating his legal landscape.

Here's a link for you if you'd like to track his legal issues. (I'm aware politico tends to lean to the left, but they put it in list format, and considering your comprehension issues, I figured that would be easiest for you) https://www.politico.com/interactives/2023/trump-criminal-investigations-cases-tracker-list/

I didn't even say anything about porn stars... I deserve to be applauded for keeping it high brow at the very least.

So, if you're asking me which of these are “serious,” I’d say all of them are. They aren’t just noise; they represent significant legal troubles that could lead to real consequences.

And calling me an arrogant snot? That’s rich. It’s always entertaining when the ones who throw around insults, whose ideologies are rooted in division, suddenly start playing the victim card. But hey, if it brings you comfort, who am I to disrupt your little echo chamber?

As for winning an election: yeah, I can admit that the election was legitimate and wasn't the outcome I wanted. So, kudos to you! Can your desired candidate say the same thing about the 2020 election? And winning isn’t the end-all be-all. It’s about the bigger picture, the values, and the implications of those victories. It’s not just about the immediate win; it’s how those results will affect our collective future. I'm hoping they will be minimal.

Anyways, let’s keep this lively back and forth going. Your punchlines might be entertaining, but if they don’t address the core issues, they’re just a distraction from the real issues that, based on you're replies, you are not well versed on.

 

[gneiss rocks]

Oh, so now we’re counting? Just one twisted point?

Now, regarding those “serious legal troubles,” let’s get specific. We've heard them all before but it seems you're having a hard time acknowledging them. Trump is currently facing multiple legal challenges, including:

1. Civil Fraud Case: The New York Attorney General's office found that Trump and his companies inflated asset values to secure favorable loans and insurance rates, resulting in a civil lawsuit that could ultimately cost him billions. This isn’t just a slap on the wrist; it’s a major blow to his business empire.
2. Classified Documents Case: After leaving office, Trump was indicted for allegedly mishandling classified documents, including top-secret materials. This is serious, as it involves national security and could lead to significant legal repercussions.
3. Election Interference Charges: Trump has faced legal scrutiny related to his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. This includes charges of conspiracy and solicitation to commit election fraud, which put a spotlight on potential threats to democratic processes.
4. January 6th Insurrection: He faces allegations of inciting the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol, which resulted in deaths and severe injury to law enforcement, further complicating his legal landscape.

Here's a link for you if you'd like to track his legal issues. (I'm aware politico tends to lean to the left, but they put it in list format, and considering your comprehension issues, I figured that would be easiest for you) https://www.politico.com/interactives/2023/trump-criminal-investigations-cases-tracker-list/

I didn't even say anything about porn stars... I deserve to be applauded for keeping it high brow at the very least.

So, if you're asking me which of these are “serious,” I’d say all of them are. They aren’t just noise; they represent significant legal troubles that could lead to real consequences.

And calling me an arrogant snot? That’s rich. It’s always entertaining when the ones who throw around insults, whose ideologies are rooted in division, suddenly start playing the victim card. But hey, if it brings you comfort, who am I to disrupt your little echo chamber?

As for winning an election: yeah, I can admit that the election was legitimate and wasn't the outcome I wanted. So, kudos to you! Can your desired candidate say the same thing about the 2020 election? And winning isn’t the end-all be-all. It’s about the bigger picture, the values, and the implications of those victories. It’s not just about the immediate win; it’s how those results will affect our collective future. I'm hoping they will be minimal.

Anyways, let’s keep this lively back and forth going. Your punchlines might be entertaining, but if they don’t address the core issues, they’re just a distraction from the real issues that, based on you're replies, you are not well versed on.

Did you believe the fake news 3 year Russia collusion hoax, or Trump?
Did you believe Fauci and your fake news, or Trump?
Did You believe the fake news and 51 intelligence officials, or Rudy and Trump?
Has your brain been "wiped, like with a cloth or something?"

These are all in the same category and you just keep coming back for more? Why?

If you just listen and chase your horse dewormer with bleach, I'm sure you will figure this out.

 

[lchsman]

Did you believe the fake news 3 year Russia collusion hoax, or Trump?
Did you believe Fauci and your fake news, or Trump?
Did You believe the fake news and 51 intelligence officials, or Rudy and Trump?
Has your brain been "wiped, like with a cloth or something?"

These are all in the same category and you just keep coming back for more? Why?

If you just listen and chase your horse dewormer with bleach, I'm sure you will figure this out.

They will get drilled worse in 2028. They just don’t get it.

 

[WJ-OSU-STEELERS]

J6 was such a bad, self-inflicted event it kept Trump from winning the election in dramatic fashion.

Lol

Bill Clinton’s approval ratings spiked up with African American males after the Monica Lewinsky ordeal became public knowledge. Jerry Springer did extremely well for 30 years. The Kardashians have made billions off of a porn tape that launched their start. WWE & Vince McMahon have made billions off of scripted content that is not all that different than a soap opera….America loves its undesirable lowlifes.

 

[winbypin]

Bill Clinton’s approval ratings spiked up with African American males after the Monica Lewinsky ordeal became public knowledge. Jerry Springer did extremely well for 30 years. The Kardashians have made billions off of a porn tape that launched their start. WWE & Vince McMahon have made billions off of scripted content that is not all that different than a soap opera….America loves its undesirable lowlifes.

Cool. Which one of these people won the presidency after their self-inflicted events?

 

[brian1227]

Biden will attend trump did not.biden has class.Top 15 president.trump.bottom 3.