The current coach had no say in the decision. He is not ducking anyone. The reason for the suspension of play was discussed thoroughly in a previous thread following the in season game, Read from Post 140 on.
4th and 9 for Irish. Hoban kids celebrate every play.
yappi.com
You are demonstrating my point for me thank you.
Pretending that the football coach has no impact on who his team plays is ridiculous and is part of the "plausable deniability" that st v's is trying to use. Muddy the waters, never quite commit to a decision, always "still evaluating". In the end the decision will have been made by faceless beurocrats and "it was out of our hands". I call bs on that. Again, I guarantee that st v's coach's message is for players to accept responsibility and be accountable, yet the coach and the school cannot do it themsleves.
Secondly, in the referenced thread, you state:
Tyrell knows why SVSM won’t play them next year and he can’t handle it. It all stems from an incident following last year’s game instigated by a Hoban coach and witnessed by a SVSM administrator. The decision was made then.
So, in your telling, st v's made the decision A YEAR AGO, yet doesn't have the wherewithall to come out in the newspaper and OWN IT. Ask yourself, why are they unwilling to state this publically but rather would like to send out their spokespeople like yourself to create inuendo and tell everyone the real reasons? Might they realize they are on the wrong side of the issue and are embarrassed by it? If what you are saying is true, it is dishonorable what st v's is doing in the newspapers.
Further, you are saying that some bad behavior by a hoban coach makes st v's want to pick up their toys and go home. That again makes the team look like woosies. "coach was mean to me..." No consideration for the years-long tradition that the kids from both schools love simply because an opposing coach did something that was wrong. Used to be that teams would respond to that by wooping their opponents. no longer i guess.