• Happy 24th Birthday to Yappi.com!! Just made it with a minute left before the Birthday was over!! Link

Tim tebow

Luck is once or twice in a game. Which happens. And what I was really agreeing with (which I should have said so) was when Quinn said "The entire game, the defensive line is chasing the quarterback around, and that wears down the pass rush. Meanwhile, the defensive backs are chasing receivers, but you only throw eight passes, so they start to feel lazy. It only takes that one play, that one big pass, for a touchdown."

I don't know if Tebow does it on purpose, and neither do you Chazz, but it's a great strategy so long as Denver's defense keeps them in the game.
 
Luck is once or twice in a game. Which happens. And what I was really agreeing with (which I should have said so) was when Quinn said "The entire game, the defensive line is chasing the quarterback around, and that wears down the pass rush. Meanwhile, the defensive backs are chasing receivers, but you only throw eight passes, so they start to feel lazy. It only takes that one play, that one big pass, for a touchdown."

I don't know if Tebow does it on purpose, and neither do you Chazz, but it's a great strategy so long as Denver's defense keeps them in the game.

There were 2 or 3 games of all the total games he started that they threw the ball that little. Furthermore, the "defensive line wearing themselves down" argument is pathetic and laughable. As if to say that these professional football players lack endurance, or that other mobile quarterbacks are simplified to this ridiculous theory/excuse. Also, the majority of Tebow's wins were come from behind wins, which means he HAD to make plays, which he did. Give up already.
 
There were 2 or 3 games of all the total games he started that they threw the ball that little. Furthermore, the "defensive line wearing themselves down" argument is pathetic and laughable. As if to say that these professional football players lack endurance, or that other mobile quarterbacks are simplified to this ridiculous theory/excuse. Also, the majority of Tebow's wins were come from behind wins, which means he HAD to make plays, which he did. Give up already.

Exactly. Come from behind. When the defense was tired.
 
How is that an excuse? :confused: That's a strategy by Denver. Wear the opposing teams' defense out and capitalize while using your defense to keep the score close.
 
LOL you give Tebow credit for wearing down opposing defenses yet Chazz still somehow gets defensive and calls that an "excuse" even though that doesn't make any sense :laugh:
 
How is that an excuse? :confused: That's a strategy by Denver. Wear the opposing teams' defense out and capitalize while using your defense to keep the score close.

Again, you never cease to amaze me with your ignorance of the game. It was a league wide strategy early in Tebow's time as a starter to keep him in the pocket, limiting the pass rush. So first, the excuse is, "Well, he has all day to throw. That's why he's beating teams over the top." Now, it's, "The pass rush was so relentless, they merely fell victim to fatigue." Which one is it? Why are you not making excuses for every other successful QB's success in the league?
 
Again, you never cease to amaze me with your ignorance of the game. It was a league wide strategy early in Tebow's time as a starter to keep him in the pocket, limiting the pass rush. So first, the excuse is, "Well, he has all day to throw. That's why he's beating teams over the top." Now, it's, "The pass rush was so relentless, they merely fell victim to fatigue." Which one is it? Why are you not making excuses for every other successful QB's success in the league?

He wasn't beating teams over the top save for like one or 2 throws a game. Beating teams over the top would mean he can complete more than 50% of his throws. He didn't do that. He wore down defenses (strategy, not an excuse). I'm not making excuses. I'm crediting Tebow. You bash me for when I don't give him credit, you bash me when I do give him credit.
 
And let's be real, Pittsburgh lost to Denver because they were beat up in the secondary and on the offensive side of the ball.
 
I agree with Quinn's statement that Tebow was lucky[except for the Pitts game, where he was actually good]
 
He wasn't beating teams over the top save for like one or 2 throws a game. Beating teams over the top would mean he can complete more than 50% of his throws. He didn't do that. He wore down defenses (strategy, not an excuse). I'm not making excuses. I'm crediting Tebow. You bash me for when I don't give him credit, you bash me when I do give him credit.

Chazzy, where'd you go?
 
Top