Scores

 
Friday, March 24:

Archbishop Alter Tri-Match
Alter def. Xenia 25-4, 25-7
Alter def. Miamisburg 25-7, 25-10
Miamisburg def. Xenia 25-15, 26-24

Northmont Tri-Match
Northmont def. Chaminade Julienne 25-15, 25-21
Northmont def. Gahanna Lincoln 25-16, 21-25, 25-15
Chaminade Julienne def. Gahanna Lincoln 25-22, 25-27, 26-24

Bishop Watterson def. Whetstone 22-25, 27-25, 26-24, 25-17
St Charles def. Upper Arlington 25-13, 23-25, 25-23, 25-20
LaSalle def. Lakota West 25-12, 25-6, 25-20
St Ignatius def. St Edward 25-20, 25-14, 25-14
Walsh Jesuit def. Brecksville-BH 25-17, 25-20, 25-14
Brunswick vs. VASJ
 
Last edited:
Saturday, March 25:

St Charles Tri-Match
Elder def. St Charles 25-16, 25-15, 25-16
Elder def. Westerville South 25-23, 25-17, 25-22
Westerville South def. St Charles 25-19, 25-20, 25-21

Pickerington North Tri-Match
Beavercreek def. Pickerington North 25-13, 25-15
Beavercreek def. Stow-Munroe Falls 25-10, 25-12
Stow-Munroe Falls def. Pickerington North 16-25, 25-21, 25-22

Mount Vernon Tri-Match
Walsh Jesuit def. Mount Vernon 19-25, 25-18, 25-18, 25-27, 15-7
Lakota East def. Walsh Jesuit 25-20, 25-17, 25-11
Lakota East def. Mount Vernon 25-20, 25-12, 25-17

Louisville Tri-Match
Centerville vs. Trinity
Centerville vs. St Xavier (KY)

Perry Tri-Match
VASJ vs. Perry
VASJ vs. SVSM
Perry vs. SVSM

Thomas Worthington Quad
Edgewood def. Thomas Worthington 25-19, 26-24
Brecksville-BH def. Thomas Worthington 25-14, 25-19
Thomas Worthington def. Northland 25-20, 25-16
Edgewood vs. Brecksville-BH 25-16, 25-20
Edgewood def. Northland 25-17, 25-12
Brecksville-BH def. Northland 25-13, 25-8
 
Last edited:
Looks like WS at least played Elder close, but unable to even take a game bodes well for the Panthers. Lakota East handling what is expected to be one of the better D2 teams is also a somewhat surprising result
 
Monday, March 27:

Archbishop Alter def. Bishop Fenwick 25-18, 25-19, 25-22
Lakota East def. Colerain 25-3, 25-5, 25-12
Carroll def. Badin 25-19, 25-18, 25-15
Princeton def. Middletown 18-25, 26-24, 25-22, 25-15
Hilliard Davidson def. Hilliard Bradley 25-15, 25-23, 25-21
LaSalle def. Fairfield 25-14, 25-21, 25-15
Delaware Hayes vs. Northland
 
Last edited:
Tuesday, March 28:

Whetstone def. Briggs 25-20, 25-16, 25-19
Mount Vernon def. Pickerington North 25-21, 26-28, 25-19, 25-19
Monroe def. Colerain 25-11, 25-16, 19-25, 25-18
Bishop Fenwick def. Archbishop McNicholas 24-26, 25-19, 23-25, 25-18, 15-11
Chaminade Julienne def. Roger Bacon 26-24, 25-21, 25-22
Olentangy def. St Charles 25-23, 25-18, 25-12
Hilliard Darby def. Thomas Worthington 25-2, 25-2, 25-12
Centerville def. Oak Hills 25-17, 25-10, 25-20
St Xavier def. Archbishop Moeller 20-25, 25-15, 25-27, 25-23, 17-15
Archbishop Hoban def. Walsh Jesuit 36-34, 25-19, 25-20
Worthington Kilbourne def. Licking Heights 25-22, 25-13, 25-14
Elder def. Beavercreek 26-28, 25-22, 25-22, 25-22
Brecksville-BH vs. St Vincent-St Mary
Fairfield def. Princeton 25-11, 25-16, 23-25, 21-25, 16-14
Upper Arlington def. Chillicothe 25-15, 25-11, 25-12
 
Last edited:
Moeller 2/st x 3. rowdy start to the season for both sides. St. X OH ben pung making a statement out there. questionable lineup decisions from the big moe, surprised luers isn't running a 5-1.
 
Last edited:
Moeller 2/st x 3. rowdy start to the season for both sides. St. X OH ben pung making a statement out there. questionable lineup decisions from the big moe, surprised luers isn't running a 5-1.

Seems like Pung would be a (super) early candidate for POY next year as a senior. I saw he had 24 kills last night, 13 digs, 3 blocks and 3 aces. That's quite a stat line.
 
Seems like Pung would be a (super) early candidate for POY next year as a senior. I saw he had 24 kills last night, 13 digs, 3 blocks and 3 aces. That's quite a stat line.

he was on last night. if his play stays consistent like that i would have to agree with you.
 
Seems like Pung would be a (super) early candidate for POY next year as a senior. I saw he had 24 kills last night, 13 digs, 3 blocks and 3 aces. That's quite a stat line.

He's the second best player in the class so that would make sense. Unfortunately not much love is given to the Libero position, or Parker from Beavercreek would be my guy for POY.
 
Wednesday, March 29:

Upper Arlington def. Reynoldsburg 25-11, 25-6, 25-15
Bishop Watterson def. Briggs 25-19, 25-12, 25-19
Carroll def. Roger Bacon 25-18, 14-25, 25-17, 25-22
Hilliard Davidson def. St Charles 25-22, 25-23, 25-20
Lakota West def. Miamisburg 25-7, 25-15, 25-7
Lakota East def. LaSalle 25-27, 25-8, 25-18, 20-25, 15-8
 
Last edited:
HS position vs Club position

He's the second best player in the class so that would make sense. Unfortunately not much love is given to the Libero position, or Parker from Beavercreek would be my guy for POY.

Question for you. I believe Parker is playing OH at Beavercreek. For POY are you evaluating his play at his HS position in comparison to others? Or are you evaluating his play and status at his Club position versus others?
 
Voting on POY or all state/region teams should ONLY be based on the high school season. Club should have ZERO to do with how a coach votes. If a kid can't/doesn't play club that should not be held against them if they have a better high school season than another kid who does.
 
Voting on POY or all state/region teams should ONLY be based on the high school season. Club should have ZERO to do with how a coach votes. If a kid can't/doesn't play club that should not be held against them if they have a better high school season than another kid who does.

How much would you take in to consideration Collegiate commitment?
 
I also don't completely agree with club not playing a factor. Sure it's not fair to the kids who can't/don't play club. But if you're to compare Mikesh to Pung as Outsides for a potential POY, then that's also not fair knowing Pung is better. Now compare Mikesh at Libero to Pung at Outside. Pound for pound Mikesh is a better Libero than Pung is Outside. Just my 2 cents..
 
Question for you. I believe Parker is playing OH at Beavercreek. For POY are you evaluating his play at his HS position in comparison to others? Or are you evaluating his play and status at his Club position versus others?

Didn't realize he was playing OH, good coaching move for Beavercreek.

I am evaluating this off of most skilled. IMO he is the best passer and defender in the state, and possibly the best setter in the state if he were to set.

Pung is a great all around player, but I can't say that he is the best at any one skill.

By no means am I trying to dis Pung, I enjoy his game and he seems to be a nice kid.
 
How much would you take in to consideration Collegiate commitment?

None. If I had a vote, it would go to the player that was the best player during that high school season. Not club season, not a combination of last year and this year, not based on their college potential, or if they are playing in college. The player that had the best 2017 (or if we are comparing Pung and Mikesch, 2018) season. In the end, the winner typically ends up going to the best player on the best team. Sometimes that player is deserving, other times there are 1 or 2 players that in my opinion have deserved it more.
 
Class year status impact on POY vote

Does a player's class impact POY vote? A couple of posts have mentioned Parker's Junior status putting him in the mix for next years vote. IF Beavercreek made a run to State Final wouldn't he merit a strong POY support? There are really good seniors (Darby and West. South boys, Moe - Luers, Bowles; Elder - Klusman, Witte, Koenig) that will have meaningful impact on the state runs on their teams. But Juniors like Chris Kiser at Moeller and Mikesh at Beavercreek may be more valuable to their teams. Just asking as the last debate was fun. This isn't a debate on the individual players as the ones above are nice kids and solid players.
 
Does a player's class impact POY vote? A couple of posts have mentioned Parker's Junior status putting him in the mix for next years vote. IF Beavercreek made a run to State Final wouldn't he merit a strong POY support? There are really good seniors (Darby and West. South boys, Moe - Luers, Bowles; Elder - Klusman, Witte, Koenig) that will have meaningful impact on the state runs on their teams. But Juniors like Chris Kiser at Moeller and Mikesh at Beavercreek may be more valuable to their teams. Just asking as the last debate was fun. This isn't a debate on the individual players as the ones above are nice kids and solid players.

In a true aspect of the POY, I would agree that it should be the player that has made the most impact for his team on its quest for a state run. It should also be regardless of class, but we all know that this is a political quagmire. Too many agendas and program bias usually clouds these selections.
 
In a true aspect of the POY, I would agree that it should be the player that has made the most impact for his team on its quest for a state run. It should also be regardless of class, but we all know that this is a political quagmire. Too many agendas and program bias usually clouds these selections.

yet ian cowen or dejon clark wasn't picked last year...someone say political quagmire?
 
In a true aspect of the POY, I would agree that it should be the player that has made the most impact for his team on its quest for a state run. It should also be regardless of class, but we all know that this is a political quagmire. Too many agendas and program bias usually clouds these selections.

I agree with this statement. Class should not make a difference, but I'm sure there are coaches with the thought process of, "I'll just vote for them next year." That isn't fair to the younger player because things like injuries, losing the supporting cast, or just getting passed up by other players can happen.

Just my two cents, not sure it's even worth that :angel:
 
yet ian cowen or dejon clark wasn't picked last year...someone say political quagmire?

Despite being from Cincinnati, even I can see they were the two best players in the state. The thing with voting is that every coach that wants a vote, has a vote. So you have coaches from schools that literally never leave their region having their vote count just as much for the state vote. Of course they are going to vote for the best player they have seen. I'm not sure I can fault them for that. Is there a better solution? Not trying to call out these schools, because there are plenty of examples, but can you tell the coaches from teams like Brunswick, Colerain, Hilliard Bradley, or Hamilton (1 team from each region) that they don't get to vote?

Speaking to last year, being from the same region definitely hurt Dejon and Ian because they probably split some of the votes from coaches in the East region
 
Not to derail discussion but can you guys move this to another thread. There were about 6 threads regarding POY you can move to. Try to keep this to scores (with sometimes brief analysis) only.
 
Thursday, March 30:

Hilliard Bradley def. Thomas Worthington 25-12, 25-13, 25-20
Whetstone def. Eastmoor Academy 25-19, 25-20, 25-23
Pickerington North def. Licking Heights 25-13, 25-9, 25-11
Northland def. Reynoldsburg 25-18, 25-7, 25-10
Princeton def. Hamilton 25-19, 25-10, 25-12
Archbishop Alter def. Archbishop McNicholas 25-17, 25-15, 25-11
Lakota East def. Middletown 25-12, 25-20, 25-12
Fairfield def. Colerain 25-11, 25-12, 25-9
Walsh Jesuit def. Villa Angela-St Joseph 25-15, 26-28, 25-14, 25-13
Archbishop Hoban def. St Edward 25-16, 25-18, 25-15
Hilliard Darby def. Delaware Hayes 25-6, 25-9, 25-11
Olentangy Liberty def. Bishop Watterson 25-12, 25-8, 25-14
Olentangy def. Worthington Kilbourne 25-2, 25-16
Roger Bacon vs. Kettering Fairmont
St Xavier def. Centerville 21-25, 25-19, 25-21, 25-23
St Ignatius def. Brecksville-BH 25-11, 25-21, 25-11
 
Last edited:
Friday, March 31:

Elder def. LaSalle 25-18, 23-25, 25-18, 25-20
St Vincent-St Mary vs. Walsh Jesuit
Chaminade Julienne def. Chillicothe 25-12, 25-12, 25-9
Beavercreek def. Hilliard Davidson 25-23, 25-11, 25-20
 
Last edited:
Top