Prep Nation's Jamie D Current Views re: National Poll

the 2 losses included a loss to a florida team

in ohio the difference betweenthe three teams is one loss to colerain

one game
one loss

colerain had a first string QB that year

they didnt this year

and even then they stormed back from a 21 point deficit to narrow the gap to one score

the difference between the three teams is one loss in the regional finals

the difference s miniscule
 
No? The difference is that X was primarily a running team in 06, but in 05 and 07 they mixed it up a lot more while still being a running team - without having to rely on Ashley for most of the carries.

Also in 06, Ashley was being pestered with toe turf for most, if not all, of the season. That will hurt you especially when you're running it 75% of the time.
 
consumerman said:
the 2 losses included a loss to a florida team

in ohio the difference betweenthe three teams is one loss to colerain

one game
one loss

colerain had a first string QB that year

they didnt this year

and even then they stormed back from a 21 point deficit to narrow the gap to one score

the difference between the three teams is one loss in the regional finals

the difference s miniscule
Click to expand...

1) Neither X nor Colerain went into the post-season with their original QBs. :hello: And X more than doubled them up on points.

2) The one loss was a butt-whuppin. And neither the '05 nor the '07 teams had close calls versus their 5-5 league doormat.


Keep going though. This is hilarious.
 
concha said:
1) Neither X nor Colerain went into the post-season with their original QBs. :hello: And X more than doubled them up on points.

2) The one loss was a butt-whuppin. And neither the '05 nor the '07 teams had close calls versus their 5-5 league doormat.


Keep going though. This is hilarious.
Click to expand...

st x great against over-rated ohio woody hayes no offense teams and local d3 schoold from indiana

THAT is HILARIOUS

St X 0-1 against power state schools (fla, cali, Texas)

the record is 0-1 vs real states

sorry
 
WrongPerson said:
No? The difference is that X was primarily a running team in 06, but in 05 and 07 they mixed it up a lot more while still being a running team - without having to rely on Ashley for most of the carries.

Also in 06, Ashley was being pestered with toe turf for most, if not all, of the season. That will hurt you especially when you're running it 75% of the time.
Click to expand...



did they mix it up a lot when they took three overtimes to score 17 points and beat a 3 loss team by 3 points?
 
consumerman said:
st x great against over-rated ohio woody hayes no offense teams and local d3 schoold from indiana

THAT is HILARIOUS

St X 0-1 against power state schools (fla, cali, Texas)

the record is 0-1 vs real states

sorry
Click to expand...

OK, cool.

How's the cupcake schedule going?
 
Given that Moe only beat one Ohio team with a winning record, and only then due to a fumble fest, you could be right. Although waiting until 1:14 left to pull out the win over a cupcake is a little dramatic, even for Californians. It was cruoel of MV to toy with them like that.
 
concha said:
Given that Moe only beat one Ohio team with a winning record, and only then due to a fumble fest, you could be right. Although waiting until 1:14 left to pull out the win over a cupcake is a little dramatic, even for Californians. It was cruoel of MV to toy with them like that.
Click to expand...

they should have just thrown a couple more bombs like the first 5 minutes

moeller is a gcl playoff team that won a playoff game in the vaunted region 4 ohio playoffs

mv won 5 of ten games in cali

mv 26, moeller 22
 
consumerman said:
they should have just thrown a couple more bombs like the first 5 minutes

moeller is a gcl playoff team that won a playoff game in the vaunted region 4 ohio playoffs

mv won 5 of ten games in cali

mv 26, moeller 22
Click to expand...

You are hilarious. What a drama queen.

"won a playoff game in the vaunted region 4 ohio playoffs". Yeah. Half of the eight teams that enter do at least that. Oh, and the following week they got reamed. LMAO.
 
concha said:
You are hilarious. What a drama queen.

"won a playoff game in the vaunted region 4 ohio playoffs". Yeah. Half of the eight teams that enter do at least that. Oh, and the following week they got reamed. LMAO.
Click to expand...

they got beat by a national top ten that is the keynote win for st x this year
 
consumerman said:
did they mix it up a lot when they took three overtimes to score 17 points and beat a 3 loss team by 3 points?
Click to expand...

No actually, if you looked it up...there was something like 15+mph winds. Any coach in their right mind wouldn't dare throw it as often as we usually do in those sort of conditions. That AND a sophomore starting his first game probably would have contributed to most of the play being on the ground.
 
Sorry if I diverse but wanted to comment on an intra state game - the basketball game between St Eds and The Cali school.

First for the game, I thought the cali school played very well and was more athletic than Eds for the first half, and had a nice double digit lead. I think in the second half, the St Eds defense adjusted and the cali team was too fancy and dipsy-do intead of playing solid fundamental basketball, while the ST Eds team operated the high-low to perfection. I thought the cali coach should have reigned in the fancy stuff sooner (if he did it at all). ANyway, great game. Both teams were solid.

The annnouncers kept referring to the cali team as the California State champion. While it is true, they are D4... there are 3 classifications higher than that and D4 is almost like a rural church league, few teams with very small student populations. The D4 team from cali traveled to play a favorite for the D1 title in Ohio, had a DD lead and forced the game into overtime.

I did like the St Eds cheering section although I gasped at yet another Braves Indian chant??????

Great game.
 
consumerman said:
Sorry if I diverse but wanted to comment on an intra state game - the basketball game between St Eds and The Cali school.

First for the game, I thought the cali school played very well and was more athletic than Eds for the first half, and had a nice double digit lead. I think in the second half, the St Eds defense adjusted and the cali team was too fancy and dipsy-do intead of playing solid fundamental basketball, while the ST Eds team operated the high-low to perfection. I thought the cali coach should have reigned in the fancy stuff sooner (if he did it at all). ANyway, great game. Both teams were solid.

The annnouncers kept referring to the cali team as the California State champion. While it is true, they are D4... there are 3 classifications higher than that and D4 is almost like a rural church league, few teams with very small student populations. The D4 team from cali traveled to play a favorite for the D1 title in Ohio, had a DD lead and forced the game into overtime.

I did like the St Eds cheering section although I gasped at yet another Braves Indian chant??????

Great game.
Click to expand...

Jrue Holiday is a wonderful talent to watch. Smooth moves. Does it all.

Campbell Hall was the Left Coast #6 ranked team last year and starts there this year.

School size is frequently unimportant in basketball, especially amongst teams that go traveling. Though CH was on the road, they had four games under their belts. It was Eds first regular season game this year and they played it under a national spotlight. Apart from falling apart for a few minutes and getting in the hole, I think Eds was a bit better team, especially given that it was game one for them. Campbell Hall was very good though, but a bit too dependent on Holiday IMO.

Great game. great teams.
 
Yes. The announcers pointed to him as a kid to watch out for. They had a 6'7" soph who will be a good one also. Losing Holiday after this season will hurt, but their cupboard will be far from bare.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top