OSU/PSU

Not easy to take positives away from this dual, but Rocco and Vinny make the future all more enticing. Vinny was right there, and Rocco was in it.
 
Should be 6-0 Bucks after 2
Where's the "ref" here ? Youre not allowed to say that ref's cost kids matches on bad calls don't you know? Anyhow , I didn't like the call, but it's not like it mattered...125 is a cluster **** anyone can basically bet anyone, seeds will mean little. How about Demelio who seems like he's been around forever losing to Freshman Kasak, and the 10 point swing on the pancake by Rodizke...thats not going to happen again, getting "caught" is real after dominating. Good effort by Ohio Sate though, what's interesting is two of their most coveted recruits, 1 who is struggling as the #1 recruit 3 years ago, and Karchla not wrestling. Cael Is the man end of story.
 
Ryder down 9-4 and sticks Truax… got to be the biggest dark horse in college wrestling.
I don't know if anybody else caught it, but Rogotzke had that same identical situation earlier in the match, but for some reason he wasn't committed to the move (cow catcher or pancake). It was there and he seemed to give up on it. He didn't miss it the second time it presented itself to him. I'm going to have to go back and re-watch the recording to see if the move was what I am remembering in my head.

Agree with everyone else on the Kilkearny match. Watched the recording over and over and I still don't know how he didn't come out with the score. I actually had him with the back exposure for something that was just short of - or right at 4 seconds. Was there some other reason why would he not have been awarded take down points for the exposure while in the NDZ? I have to believe that is what Ryan was arguing. Did it ever come out as to why it was not awarded? Any interview where it came out what the ref ruled?
 
I don't know if anybody else caught it, but Rogotzke had that same identical situation earlier in the match, but for some reason he wasn't committed to the move (cow catcher or pancake). It was there and he seemed to give up on it. He didn't miss it the second time it presented itself to him. I'm going to have to go back and re-watch the recording to see if the move was what I am remembering in my head.

Agree with everyone else on the Kilkearny match. Watched the recording over and over and I still don't know how he didn't come out with the score. I actually had him with the back exposure for something that was just short of - or right at 4 seconds. Was there some other reason why would he not have been awarded take down points for the exposure while in the NDZ? I have to believe that is what Ryan was arguing. Did it ever come out as to why it was not awarded? Any interview where it came out what the ref ruled?
The color of the opponent's singlet
 
Top