Good point. Because if you aren’t in support of a racist team nickname, you’re obviously a communist.
Depends on who you ask, I suppose. Lefties sure seem to like Socialist / Communist ideas as a platoon of Demo would be Presidents tried to sell their constituency from early 2019 up to today. And, I doubt very many conservatives are in the "change the name" charge re: the Redskins.
It's too bad there is very little outcry from any actual Indians about the name "Redskins". I constantly see polls and surveys that suggest most are indifferent to Indian based names, even including "Redskins". I wouldn't include "Redskins" among them, but I have seen a lot of sentiment to the effect that many Indians like some of the Indian themed names like "Warriors" or "Braves", "Chiefs" etc... ones that show a sign of strength and respect. It's mostly liberal leftist Whites that are bent about it, in my perception of this event.
You are, of course, Constitutionally entitled to disagree with me. It's a right most conservatives recognize, as most liberals do not.
I recognize that George Preston Marshall (Founder and longtime owner of the Redskins) wasn't exactly what you might term "progressive" when it came to race relations. His long standing refusal to hire black talent after all the other teams of the NFL (13 at that time 1962) is a point of fact.
However, GPM originally named his new franchise, which began in Boston, the Braves; because he was doing what many many NFL teams did in the 20's on into the 1940's and tried to tailcoat off the prestige of the MLB club in town; since his first lease was for Braves Field. He did what the Bears (Cubs), NFL Indians (defunct), NFL Reds (defunct), NFL Pirates (now Steelers), a couple of different editions of both Yankees and Dodgers and the NY Giants too all did. I may have missed a few.
When Fenway Park was renovated after a fire in 1933, Marshall was offered a superior lease to play there. To get as close to the name "Red Sox" as possible (and disassociate his team from the MLB Braves and Braves Field.) he named his team the "Redskins". To sound sort of like "Red Sox". Plus I believe the team's jersies had Indian heads on them and he may have had some stock of Indian themed team merchandise that he sold at his concession stands. So, Marshall was probably cheap too. I doubt Marshall thought much of anything at all about Indians as people, positive or negative. He hired "Lone Star" Dietz to coach the team at one point and he was purported to be and was identified publicly as being an Indian (although to be fair, there are some that say he was not of Indian background.) I believe had the Red Sox been named (say) the Pilgrims, GPM would have called his team the Puritans or some such and some different group would potentially be up in arms, either real or imagined like today's "crisis". IOW, GPM didn't call the team the Redskins as a racial slur. He did it to identify with the Red Sox as closely as he could.
Regardless, Snyder and his management team are going to cave and introduce something new. I bet he will sell his Redskins merchandise (probably long, even indefinitely; after the official change) and his new team merchandise too. It should be a bonanza for him and the NFL. Might even start a name change trend.
Anyway, I think the whole issue is making a mountain out of a molehill, personally. Your (any reader) mileage may vary and that's your right. I am always ready to agree to disagree. I basically am sick of lefties trying to tell others what they should think, what sports teams should be called, who they should honor or not honor with statues and monuments, who should be allowed to speak publicly on college campuses... etc.