why does the combined rankings show dls #2 and neither katy nor SLC in the top 4?
cherrypicking again daditis?
Don't worry, Consumerman, your beloved Spartans (who you've never seen play) still make the top 10.
why does the combined rankings show dls #2 and neither katy nor SLC in the top 4?
cherrypicking again daditis?
funny how a thread about mater dei and servite turned into a chest thumping thread for slc
daditis the hijack king
haha whats up with that I remember when my high school in texas played them freshman year they all had bleach blonde hair except for Newton and the other black kid.
EXTREMELY HEAVY
WHERE IS THE MATER DEI SERVITE INFO????????????????????
LOL Is the MORE you want to say about Mater Dei and Servite? What do you want to add about them?
LOL Is the MORE you want to say about Mater Dei and Servite? What do you want to add about them?
QUIT HIJACKING THREADS OR USING ANOTHER POSTER'S ONE LINE AS AN EXCUSE TO MAKE POST AFTER POST ABOUT SLC
Here are the brackets for the Pac 5 playoffs:
Upper Bracket:
Santa Margarita (Trinity At-Large) at Long Beach Poly (Moore #1)
Newport Harbor (Sunset #3) at Sherman Oaks Notre Dame (Serra #1)
Compton (Moore #3) at Edison (Sunset #1)
Mission Viejo (South Coast #2) at Orange Lutheran (Trinity #2)
Lower Bracket:
San Clemente (South Coast #3) at Servite (Trinity #1)
Lakewood (Moore #2) at Esperanza (Sunset #2)
Mater Dei (Trinity #3) at Tesoro (South Coast #1)
Millikan (Moore #4) at Crespi (Serra #2)
6 teams (in bold) have at one time or another this year been nationally top 25 rated
that does not include Mission Viejo who beat a GCL playoff team
Here are the brackets for the Pac 5 playoffs:
Upper Bracket:
Santa Margarita (Trinity At-Large) at Long Beach Poly (Moore #1)
Newport Harbor (Sunset #3) at Sherman Oaks Notre Dame (Serra #1)
Compton (Moore #3) at Edison (Sunset #1)
Mission Viejo (South Coast #2) at Orange Lutheran (Trinity #2)
Lower Bracket:
San Clemente (South Coast #3) at Servite (Trinity #1)
Lakewood (Moore #2) at Esperanza (Sunset #2)
Mater Dei (Trinity #3) at Tesoro (South Coast #1)
Millikan (Moore #4) at Crespi (Serra #2)
6 teams (in bold) have at one time or another this year been nationally top 25 rated
that does not include Mission Viejo who beat a GCL playoff team
Is this different from the state tournament, or is it similar to the regional alignments that the Ohio playoff system has?
Is this different from the state tournament, or is it similar to the regional alignments that the Ohio playoff system has?
there is no state tournament
...
To get nominated for the new (last year) state bowl games, you have to win your section, then win a vote as either the North representative or the South representative, beating out other section winners.
there is no state tournament
the Pac 5 is only one part of the Southern Section, there are other playoff groups within the Southern Section and then 9 other sections although three of those sections are relatively small (Los Angeles City Section, San Francisco City Section, Oakland City Section). There is the San Diego Section, the Central Coast Section, the San Joaquin Section and several others.
To get nominated for the new (last year) state bowl games, you have to win your section, then win a vote as either the North representative or the South representative, beating out other section winners.
For instance, DLS plays in the NCS and they would have to be nominated (should they win their section playoffs) over the winner of the Central Coast Section (think greater San Jose area), the San Joaquin Section (think greater Sacramento area) and the Oak and SF City Sections.
the Southern Section is the LARGEST of California's ten sections, if you win your portion of the SS playoffs, you would have to get nominated over other SS winners, the San Diego Section winner, the Fresno area section winner and the LA city section winner
last year, there was some controversy as a 2 loss Canyon COuntry was nominated over JW North another SS winner who was 14-0 and the San Diego Section winner who I believe was undefeated but had 1 or 2 ties and the Fresno section winner. Canyon Country answered their critics by upsetting De La Salle
Wow. That sounds more f*cked up than the BCS!
Can anyone in the NCS give DLS a run for their money?
How in the Good Lords name did Southlake avoid any trouble and get put in this division and bracket. No Trinity, No Mojo. The good teams are in the other division again. But the bet is they win the title and I still say they will not because they are not good enough, and yes I will bet on it.The playoff brackets are set. Woody, you've been saying SLC is not going to win Texas this year. YOU need to put your money where you mouth is. WHO is going to beat SLC before the state final game?
It's time to put up or shut up.
I've done it. Now it's your turn.
This would be the equivalent of having each of Ohio's four regions in each division pick two teams to play in a state championship game, instead of the four teams actually playing each other to determine who goes to the state championship game.
Can you imagine how crazy people would get if that was the system in Ohio? People would go absolutely ape-you-know-what.
How in the Good Lords name did Southlake avoid any trouble and get put in this division and bracket. No Trinity, No Mojo. The good teams are in the other division again. But the bet is they win the title and I still say they will not because they are not good enough, and yes I will bet on it.
LOL. The "good teams are in the other division again"???? You don't know what you are talking about.
When SLC won the titles in 2004 and 2005 their bracket was MUCH tougher than the D1 bracket. In 2006 SLC had to play the 2nd best team in the state in round 2 (#1 and #2 were in SLC's bracket). SLC has always played the best of the best in the playoffs.
2007 will not be any different. The BEST TWO TEAMS in Texas (#2 SLC and #1 Katy) are in Division 2.