This argument presumes that the chance of winning in OT for CM would have been less than, or at the most, 50%. (Or at least less than the odds of going for 2). I disagree with this. All the momentum was with CM at the end of the game. In OT, Ursuline would have had a tough time scoring and a tough time stopping CM. I'm no statistician, but I'd guess the odds of CM winning in OT would have been much greater than 50%. I have no issue with a coach rolling the dice on a 2-point conversion, but IMO the odds were less than had they gone to overtime. In certain circumstances, I absolutely agree going for 2 is the best move. For example, in the Auburn-Alabama game, when Auburn scored in the first OT I absolutely would have gone for 2 because they weren't stopping Alabama and their offense (especially the banged up QB!) was sputtering. I think the odds were strongly in favor of going for 2 and winning or losing the game there. In this CM-Ursuline game, going for 2 certainly worked out, and you tip your hat to the coach for having the nerve to make the call. But IMO, the odds to win would have been greater in OT than it was in going for the 2-point conversion. Still, it was a gutsy call.