I get what you're saying but as I've stated in prior posts there was close to 4000 at that game in a 5000 seat stadium. Brookfield I'm guessing seats around 2000, I saw their stadium, it's going to be really nice but how is Brookfield going to do it, it's not built for that large of a crowd even if it was 3000 instead of 4000. Best case scenario is to play it at Hubbard with monetary compensation to Brookfield. I can understand if the Brookfield following would not like that, and quite frankly I couldn't blame them at all. Anyway, it's up to the Brookfield AD for week #1 next year, plus Hubbard did them a favor and Hubbard will end up with only 4 home games at The Beautiful next year because of Brookfield's problem of their stadium not being completed on time. That's also not fair to the Hubbard faithful as well. So, in my opinion, and only my opinion, either play it next year at The Beautiful, or cancel the game altogether and move on, this is totally up to the Brookfield AD, they're the ones that approached Hubbard and wanted them for their inauguration game in their brand new stadium.
It'll be quite interesting to see how Brookfield ends up solving that seating problem if the game is actually played. If they end up cancelling next year's game it would be better to do it sooner rather than later so both teams have more time to find other opponents.
Hey, it's only my opinion for whatever that's worth...
It would be nice if that Brookfield poster would respond, he seemed like he knew quite a lot about their new stadium.