Final Scores (5/19)

 
Region 4
Milford 3
Hamilton 1

Middletown 1
Mason 17

Seton 0
Oak Hills 9

Colerain 0
Lakota West 18

Region 2
West Clermont 2
Lakota East 3

Beavercreek 0
Centerville 10

Springfield 2
Fairmont 12

Princeton 0
Fairfield 5

Wayne 0
Springboro 14

Region 4
Boro vs Mason at Lebanon
Elks vs West at Kings
Fairfield vs Fairmont at centerville
Milford vs Oak Hills at Fairfield

Region 2
Lakota East vs Lebanon at Princeton 2 pm
 
Last edited:
Region 1
Reynoldsburg 0
Lancaster 40

Hillard Davidson 4
Thomas Worthington 8

Dublin Coffman 6
Olentangy 16

Pickerington Central 9
Hillard Darby 5

Mentor 10
GlenOak 3

Elyria 2
Berea-Midpark 7

Dublin Jerome 6
Olentangy Liberty 13

Gahanna Lincoln 8
Olentangy Orange 7
 
Region 3
Stow-Munrue Falls 1
Austintown Fitch 11

Strongsville 9
Canton Mckinley 2

Whitmer 3
Massillon Jackson 6

Cleveland St Joseph 5
Findley 8

Lorain 2
Brunswick 12

Magnificat 0
North Canton Hoover 10

Ecluid 0
Perrysburg 2 Forfeit

Medina 25
Kenston 1
 
Region 2
Groveport Madison 0
Marysville 9

Upper Arlington 3
Central Crossing 7

Westland 0
Delware Hayes 22

Pickerington North 4
Olentangy Berlin 5

New Albany 4
Hillard Bradley 8

Newark 1
Grove City 11
 
DIII District

Dover 4
New Philadelphia 3

Final (12 inn)

Looked like it could have been interference on the runner that scored the game winning run.
 
Last edited:
Yappi said:
DIII District

Dover 4
New Philadelphia 3

Final (12 inn)

Looked like it could have been interference on the runner that scored the game winning run.
Click to expand...
Explain your point of view have watched the reply twice , the ball is off the pitcher's glove, also the runner ran behind the SS which would also make it a non interference play as she gave the fielder a chance at the ball.
 
Beans100 said:
Explain your point of view have watched the reply twice , the ball is off the pitcher's glove, also the runner ran behind the SS which would also make it a non interference play as she gave the fielder a chance at the ball.
Click to expand...
The ball was hit up the middle and the shortstop took a step to her left. The ball was quickly deflected by the pitcher and the SS attempted to return to her right as the runner passed behind her. The SS spun around and missed the ball. It looked like the runner may have contacted the SS and spun her around as the ball was passing by. It is impossible to see on the video if the runner made contact with the SS.

If there was contact, it would be interference. If no contact, no interference.
 
Beans100 said:
Explain your point of view have watched the reply twice , the ball is off the pitcher's glove, also the runner ran behind the SS which would also make it a non interference play as she gave the fielder a chance at the ball.
Click to expand...
I was there and there was definitely contact between the runner and the fielder as the fielder was getting ready to field the ball. You are absolutely right about the replays, couldn't see the play from them. The only thing you do see is the runner stopping at 3rd, putting both her hands on her head and knowing she made a mistake. There are two pictures circulating on the internet that shows the contact but I was told that the umpire that made the call said there was contact but it happened after the ball was by the SS, which wasn't true.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250521_114534.jpg
    IMG_20250521_114534.jpg
    86 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_20250521_114539(1).jpg
    IMG_20250521_114539(1).jpg
    86.1 KB · Views: 27
Those pics make it look like interference. It stinks that the runner did everything she could to avoid her but if there is contact at that point, it is interference. Should have been two outs with a runner on first.

I just wonder if the tip by the pitcher caused more confusion?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top