It's hard working with a school that has 60 boys when most are interested in soccer, the arts or XC. That leaves you with maybe 20-25 kids that want to play football.
FTFY, but you’re correct.
I will say that, unfortunately, I think even if you subtracted those non-football activities out and it was strictly football only (as a control) the overarching issues still come into play.
I think, at this point for Fisher, is can they get back to being above .500 constantly. It's hard reestablishing a program that once had its footing under them.
The ‘22 season was an absolute low point in so many ways. Nine RC’s put on them. But the issues go beyond the scores that year. I’d have stuck around in my general involvement with the school and its athletics if it was just an 0-10 with nine RC’s.
As far as my eye could see, everything else going on wasn’t worth sticking around for. Sticking with it only would’ve made things worse, and frankly nothing good would’ve sprung had I stayed. Two seasons removed, I’m not aware of anything being resolved in the meantime.
Especially when half the resources of the 2000's-2010's aren't there.
The last 4-5 years of Fisher in football was those kids were playing for the love of the sport. Trying to keep a sense of community pride in FC from what was left.
I agree 100%. I appreciate you recognizing that; and I think my people (regardless of the vast differences in held viewpoints) also appreciate your recognition of this.
I think that’s why these last three years (specifically ‘22 and ‘23) bothered me as much, as well as the chunk of this past season. The kids deserve a higher dignity, but the results and blowouts wind down on the image of the program in the process; the lay of the land (for better or for worse) is we as a state (an Ohio society) prescribe that dignity along competitive lines. The rare exception is Rt 37 in Lancaster; the school down the street is always afforded dignity, shine and fluff for the
same results achieved as the school with the white cross on the side.
It doesn’t come easy, just like football. There is no way around it; no “easy” path to being competitive and in the process dignified as competitors. That message has never landed at FC. I’m not sure the ears are open to that — not a persuadable audience.
Fisher is very fortunate to still be playing 11 man. A lot of what you said would be a death sentence for smaller schools in Ohio.
They are.
They’re also fortunate to
still have girls’ soccer, and tennis. Along with a remarkable T&F program.
To your point and the fact they’re fortunate: by the time I graduated, we all thought we’d be the last to have those things. “Death by a thousand cuts.” The school
lost 52% of its enrollment in a ~decade span; it shrunk by 38% from the height of 317 to the time I graduated: 195 as we walked the stage.
So yes, in one hand still very fortunate. On the other hand, that lived experience with the uncertainty of whether the worst was STILL yet to come confers
urgency. You can extend that urgency across the board, football and not football. My experience after the Spring of ‘21 tells me one thing: there is no urgency toward anything. Except LT when he has free rein — that man coaches urgently, and leads urgently. Because he knows the stakes.
Fisher is unique because I truly think that if everything falls into place for a few years sometime down the road, the Irish can be a team that found its footing again and start doing great things.
I agree, again. Fisher as a school is very unique and special; but to some degree the window to capitalize on it (to elevate the school and its athletics, namely football) has passed.
FC just needs to get the community support back, and, at last, admin support. I think the goods are starting to far outweigh the bad.
This one’s gonna be very tricky to answer. Namely because I’m trying to thread the needle on my feelings and thoughts, constructively and with tact.
The community support goes hand-in-hand with the
abstract of the administrative body. I’ll come back to this in a minute.
My thoughts on the current administration: they are good, well-intentioned people tasked with undesirable jobs. I think they’ve done some very good things. There are also many things I
strongly disagree with across the board. In my opinion, bluntly, I feel there have been mistakes made and yes to a degree I have some general hard feelings.
That said, I still think they are respectable human beings and community-servants, both worthy of the support from the school they’re tasked to lead and the community underlying that school. I still want them to succeed. And don’t automatically assume I’m right and they’re wrong: shades of gray surely exist in between.
Coming back to the relationship of community support with administration: the current admin team (in their defense) inherited a major mess that’s lingered for 15-20 years. FC’s had issues with alumni engagement, and the idea that alumni can be stakeholders without writing checks, since the 2000’s. Some momentum in the right direction there was built up under the previous administration (who I think was more adept to those concepts as well as athletics in general), but that team only lasted ~2.5 years (majority of it during COVID saga) and didn’t have enough time to fully get the wheels in motion for their vision.
The current admin I think has sincerely wanted to keep going and make even stronger inroads there, but the difficulty on their end is trying to strike the perfect balance of the scales — weighing the integration of the alumni against the parish base and parents. For my age demo’s cohort, (again in their defense) it doesn’t help that I’m a thorn in their side and simultaneously one of the few who came back trying to make it a better place. You have those two things, but also the unintentional stepping into rakes (not exclusively a current admin problem, tbf) along the way on other alumni relations.
So basically their only real opportunity, I guess, is to continue on with the plan to try and “long game” build at the parish level instead (not really in their job title and in the DoC school structure its not necessarily their concern, I’d argue — but I completely understand why that’s their prerogative and why they feel it’s the best course of action.) It can be generally successful at best, but it’s prone to mixed results. Still, like I said, it’s the only promising and realistic pathway with guaranteed upside. Their window to thread in alumni in a meaningful way has probably closed by now, even if it was short. Can’t entirely fault them, again. But as it relates to me — that ship has sailed.
From a football POV on admin support: the only good they can do is let him run the show, and stop any detraction and opposition to it from inside the Irish village
in its tracks. Not unlike the majority of previous admins (last one being a rare exception, and possibly two admins prior) they aren’t really qualified to do anything beyond that. Doing anything beyond/outside unequivocal support for LT and his mission would be a net harm to the program and the school. And frankly it’s very simple: they have the best coach they could ever want. Let him do his thing and stand in lockstep with him, doing what can be done to further the program — be a firewall
for him.