LOL, my post was (and simply a response to you outright stating Pekins was better than Perry):
".Perkins better than WB? Most probably. Better than LC? Mebbe, a good case. Better than Perry? Our opinions are like our bum holes, we all got one, but I'd take Perry. A good game it would be, granted."
how has this, umm, "not aged wel?" If I'd a been predicting the Ville to win 41-6, now thats a "not aged well" post. Matter a fact, I never even cited Glenville, simply stated I thought Perry was better than Perkins (even stated it would be a good game!). Perry went 2 OT's w/ Glenville in a game many felt they shoulda won, Perkins wins by two. A hair splits the two teams. I'd still atke Perry if I had to drop a 20 down on the bar in a bet, yet it simply remains my opinion, as I stated clearly. Nothing "not aging well" about my take at all.
Congrats Pirates, enjoy the experience in Canton!!