Central Buckeye Conference (CBC) 2023

ghsknightsfan

ghsknightsfan

love the Knights and Grey Ghosts!
Bellefontaine @ Tecumseh game was a waste of a ticket.. i left at the half

St Clair is a stud and probably the best QB this area has seen in ages. the Neer kid is pretty good as well at WR. offensive line is bad and they won’t get out of the second round because of that unless St Clair goes superhuman. he’s more mobile than others gave him credit for on here.

as for Tecumseh, they have regressed quite a bit since i saw them week 1.

Arrow concession stand as good as always.
 
D

Dd03

Active member
RollingTrain said:
Jewell did it again, 3rd straight carry, this time 80 yards, for a TD….he’s well over 300

42-42
Click to expand...
This is ridiculous lol props to him but this is horrible for London. BC crushed alder and Newell didn’t even score. London can’t even stop the guy lol
 
L

LELL

Well-known member
Stirred not Shaken said:
QB can only do so much esp. a passing QB. Watching the game vs Coldwater St. Clair is not going to beat anyone with his feet, so he needs a line who can protect him. Defensively Bell has given up some points.
Click to expand...
You serious? He can extend a play or tuck it and run it. Have you seen him play?
 
W

WingTFan

Active member
ghsknightsfan said:
Bellefontaine @ Tecumseh game was a waste of a ticket.. i left at the half

St Clair is a stud and probably the best QB this area has seen in ages. the Neer kid is pretty good as well at WR. offensive line is bad and they won’t get out of the second round because of that unless St Clair goes superhuman. he’s more mobile than others gave him credit for on here.

as for Tecumseh, they have regressed quite a bit since i saw them week 1.

Arrow concession stand as good as always.
Click to expand...
I know I’m biased but curious why you would Call Bellefontaine offensive line “bad”? What happened tonight to lead you to that assessment?
 
ghsknightsfan

ghsknightsfan

love the Knights and Grey Ghosts!
WingTFan said:
I know I’m biased but curious why you would Call Bellefontaine offensive line “bad”? What happened tonight to lead you to that assessment?
Click to expand...
Tecumseh has an undersized line that is generally poor and the Bellefontaine line looked average at best against it.
 
W

WingTFan

Active member
I agree Tecumseh was bad just have no idea why you’re finding fault with the Bellefontaine OLine. Again, I’m extremely biased but can admit when we’ve struggled (London). Tavien was never pressured once and our runners all had huge holes to run through. I know many of the boys read this and will be Suprised to be critiqued when they did their job alll night. Tough being a lineman sometimes
 
B

bcw

Active member
Gamma Gobbler said:
Considering you have no skin in the game for either school or even this conference, your analysis would be considered note worthy.
Click to expand...
Or he has literally no idea what he's talking about. The film is the only truth that exists. I'll leave it at that.
 
W

WJ-OSU-STEELERS

Well-known member
The truth is also in the London 36-6 score. Beating a bad Tecumseh 42-0 is doing what a good team should.

Current Drew Pasteur projections has Bellefontaine as the #7 seed playing #10 John Glenn in wk 11. If they win a week 12 rematch could loom with London. If Bellefontaine continues to win they will earn an opportunity for a rematch with London or to prove they are as good as the other heavyweights in R11.
 
ghsknightsfan

ghsknightsfan

love the Knights and Grey Ghosts!
WingTFan said:
I agree Tecumseh was bad just have no idea why you’re finding fault with the Bellefontaine OLine. Again, I’m extremely biased but can admit when we’ve struggled (London). Tavien was never pressured once and our runners all had huge holes to run through. I know many of the boys read this and will be Suprised to be critiqued when they did their job alll night. Tough being a lineman sometimes
Click to expand...
your first issue is that your boys read this forum. this is a place for adults to talk ball in a respectful and honest manner. do kids really need another distraction these days?

second, Bellefontaine played well against a poor team. they did what they were supposed to. the line did it’s job but did not dominate by any means.. so good job taking care of business against Tecumseh, but that isn’t going to do it against Bloom Carroll, Granville, or Jackson (one of which i believe you will see in week 12)

sorry if i offended you, but i tell it as i see it. i have no skin in this game, as Gamma mentioned. i wish you guys the best and if your o-line can improve to become average against good teams, then you guys have a real chance to make some noise.
 
D

Dd03

Active member
Jewell ran for 357 yds on 27 carry’s and 7 TD’s!!! JA had 407 rushing yards

London had 3 guys over 100. Jones 248(5td), Fellure 176(2td), and Turner 124(1td). London rushed for 635 yards total.

Great offensive game for both teams. Awesome to see Jewell with those stats. However, very concerning for London going forward after week 11. Bloom Carrol demolished Alder and held Jewell in check. Watterson also has a great RB, and a passing game. Hopefully last night was just a fluke since the defense has been stout until Jewell and they’ll get back on track.
 
W

WingTFan

Active member
WJ-OSU-STEELERS said:
The truth is also in the London 36-6 score. Beating a bad Tecumseh 42-0 is doing what a good team should.

Current Drew Pasteur projections has Bellefontaine as the #7 seed playing #10 John Glenn in wk 11. If they win a week 12 rematch could loom with London. If Bellefontaine continues to win they will earn an opportunity for a rematch with London or to prove they are as good as the other heavyweights in R11.
Click to expand...
I agree with everything you just said. I took exception with the posters analysis. He watched one game in which the line gave up no pressure and opened up huge holes against an admittedly bad team and declared the OLine “bad”. It’s not what his eyes saw. It just fit the narrative he had.
The people that watch every week know the group has been better than expected but can’t be counted on to lead the way vs really good teams like London. I’ll move on.
 
ghsknightsfan

ghsknightsfan

love the Knights and Grey Ghosts!
WingTFan said:
I agree with everything you just said. I took exception with the posters analysis. He watched one game in which the line gave up no pressure and opened up huge holes against an admittedly bad team and declared the OLine “bad”. It’s not what his eyes saw. It just fit the narrative he had.
The people that watch every week know the group has been better than expected but can’t be counted on to lead the way vs really good teams like London. I’ll move on.
Click to expand...
i never said they were bad.. said below average, not good enough to beat good teams. why so sensitive about the o-line topic?

by the way.. watched the live stream of the Coldwater game.. saw the same thing. non-existent run game and St Clair being rushed.

also if you didn’t know, i have no skin in the game so i don’t know what “narrative” you’re talking about that i have.
 
W

WingTFan

Active member
Exact quote was “offensive line is bad”

I admitted initially I’m invested with my son. I’ve actually stayed fairly quiet and will return to doing so. Have a good day.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
.
Top