Cavs 2023-24

y2h

y2h

Well-known member
If you ever questioned if the media hates Cleveland the answer is the daily Mitchell trade stories.

The Cavs didn't go all in and expend all that capital to ride the guy for a year and dump him. He's going to be a Cav for the next couple seasons at least so time to move on.
 
C

cjb5656

Well-known member
y2h said:
If you ever questioned if the media hates Cleveland the answer is the daily Mitchell trade stories.

The Cavs didn't go all in and expend all that capital to ride the guy for a year and dump him. He's going to be a Cav for the next couple seasons at least so time to move on.
Click to expand...
These are the same media dooshes that spent the better part of year debating whether Giannis would be signing in NY or LA and were stunned when he stayed in Milwaukee.
 
nwwarrior09

nwwarrior09

Well-known member
cjb5656 said:
These are the same media dooshes that spent the better part of year debating whether Giannis would be signing in NY or LA and were stunned when he stayed in Milwaukee.
Click to expand...
NBA media cheers on all of the stars leaving their teams in free agency or forcing trades to cities that they (the media) personally want to visit/stay in while covering games (NY, LA, Miami, etc.).

In their world, all of the stars should be playing for the Knicks, Nets, Lakers, Clippers, Heat, etc., because it's where they want to be and it's who the networks want to pump up as being relevant.

This phenomenon, or at least to this level, doesn't exist in the other major sports. It is astounding to me how differently the Denver Nuggets get covered as compared to the Kansas City Chiefs. Media anoints Mahomes as the face of the NFL and readily pump the Chiefs as a brewing dynasty, and in the NBA you have clowns that openly say things like they accidentally left Jokic off their MVP ballot or that they didn't really see him (or the Nuggets) until the postseason due to the national coverage schedule.
 
C

cjb5656

Well-known member
nwwarrior09 said:
NBA media cheers on all of the stars leaving their teams in free agency or forcing trades to cities that they (the media) personally want to visit/stay in while covering games (NY, LA, Miami, etc.).

In their world, all of the stars should be playing for the Knicks, Nets, Lakers, Clippers, Heat, etc., because it's where they want to be and it's who the networks want to pump up as being relevant.

This phenomenon, or at least to this level, doesn't exist in the other major sports. It is astounding to me how differently the Denver Nuggets get covered as compared to the Kansas City Chiefs. Media anoints Mahomes as the face of the NFL and readily pump the Chiefs as a brewing dynasty, and in the NBA you have clowns that openly say things like they accidentally left Jokic off their MVP ballot or that they didn't really see him (or the Nuggets) until the postseason due to the national coverage schedule.
Click to expand...
I posted a few years ago that we seemed to be entering an era the NBA hasn’t seen in a long time where the stars were spread around the league and a lot of teams would have a realistic shot at an NBA title, including geographic locations not often seen at that level in the past. Well, it happened and I think it’s great for the fans and the league. Do the tv honchos like it? Probably not.
 
clarkgriswold

clarkgriswold

Well-known member
Cavs working out a deal to bring back Triston Thompson. Yikes. They must not have been able to reach Anderson Varajao.
 
M

mcm.1019

Well-known member
wolves82 said:
I'm expecting to hear from them today. I'm a 6'4" 250 pound power forward. I don't move as well as I did 40 years ago in college, but I can shoot free throws pretty well still.
Click to expand...
Have you dated a Kardashian? Have you ridden Lebron's coattails?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
.
Top