Maple_City_Fan
Well-known member
Is going to turn into Cooper and/or Coker?
Discuss
Discuss
neither...Is going to turn into Cooper and/or Coker?
Discuss
Hire Marcus Freeman away from CincinnatiNot really. He can recruit and his offenses are potent. But he's going to need a very reliable DC for the defense to keep up in terms of talent and performance.
I’ll tell Gene Smith to call John Cunningham about that. Maybe UC will pony up Bob Huggins to OSU as well.Hire Marcus Freeman away from Cincinnati
Day can definitely recruit. It's the defense that he has to change this offseason. The right hire and scheme can make him look like a genius.OSU's offense is always going to be top notch under Day. Unlike Coker, he's maintained a high level of recruiting. As long as he recognizes his shortcomings on defense and is able to get a new DC who knows what he's doing, the program will be fine. Coombs has to go, though. I'll be concerned if that doesn't happen
And I'm not buying that Oklahoma is going to be mediocre in the SEC. This is a great program with deep resources. They will be fine. They will be in the West. They are a better program than Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Auburn, Texas A&M and Texas, IMO. They are historically up there with Bama and the only reason they aren't now is because Saban has taken Bama to ridiculous heights, but when he's done...and it won't be too much longer...Bama goes back to being a normal blue blood program. When that happens I won't be surprised if it's Oklahoma winning the SEC West in most years.
It is the physicality of the SEC and B10 that most fail to realize. Playing big/fast physical teams week after week in hostile environments is tough. It is hard to stay healthy and then keep an edge. You let your guard down vs. and unranked Miss. State or Purdue and they will get you.And I'm not buying that Oklahoma is going to be mediocre in the SEC. This is a great program with deep resources. They will be fine. They will be in the West. They are a better program than Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss, Mississippi State, Auburn, Texas A&M and Texas, IMO. They are historically up there with Bama and the only reason they aren't now is because Saban has taken Bama to ridiculous heights, but when he's done...and it won't be too much longer...Bama goes back to being a normal blue blood program. When that happens I won't be surprised if it's Oklahoma winning the SEC West in most years.
We need a football czar to put the conferences back to something resembling the old days. AEW Champion is the man for the job.It is the physicality of the SEC and B10 that most fail to realize. Playing big/fast physical teams week after week in hostile environments is tough. It is hard to stay healthy and then keep an edge. You let your guard down vs. and unranked Miss. State or Purdue and they will get you.
The track record of B12/B8/SWC teams jumping to other leagues and either staying the same or doing better is not on their favor.
Arkansas
Nebraska
Texas A&M
Missouri
Colorado
All of those schools at one time were pretty powerful and today, with the exception of A&M, are shells of their former selves. Mizzou was pretty competitive under Pinkel in the B12. Colorado won a National title in 1990. Nebraska was DOMINANT through the 70's, 80's, 90's and even early 00's. Arkansas was very competitive in the old SWC before jumping.
Lincoln Riley knew EXACTLY what he was doing. Great move.
I like regional football. I think the B12 would have been great if they could have figured out a profit sharing dynamic and kept all of those aforementioned teams.
Notice he pointed out the SEC and B1G. In recent years the AAC has been better top to bottom than the Pac 12 and/or the ACC. This isn't one of those years, as the AAC is down, but again your Irish aren't playing world beaters with their ACC and Pac 12 opponents.We need a football czar to put the conferences back to something resembling the old days. AEW Champion is the man for the job.
In regards to your first point about the week to week grind of big-time football, I agree entirely. That’s what I keep telling these UC wonks and they act like it’s a foreign concept.
It’s true, it’s true. Trust me …
The New Big 12 CAN’T CUT THE MUSTARD!
No to both.Big concerns. He doesn’t even have the best team in the state. Recruiting is going to go downhill, quick.
An argument could be made that UC as a whole is better than Ohio State this year because Ohio State’s defense is softer than the stomach of that fat, bald, face-painter OSU fan who always manages to get himself on the camera every week.No to both.
I agree, but a counter argument can be made that UC had a far easier path with a much more experienced team. I like what Fickell has built at UC, so I don’t expect a meltdown like UC vs Florida in the Sugar Bowl years ago, but I also am not sure he could have navigated the OSU schedule…which I don’t think was a merciless grind…unscathed. But using better team as an all encompassing term to measure this specific season? Yes, I guess I can buy it. UC was consistent all year, while OSU failed to play complete games in all phases too many times.An argument could be made that UC as a whole is better than Ohio State this year because Ohio State’s defense is softer than the stomach of that fat, bald, face-painter OSU fan who always manages to get himself on the camera every week.
It’s true, it’s true. Trust me …
NOTRE DAME BELONGS IN THE PLAYOFF!