Betsy Ross?!? The Alamo was one of the 2 biggest battles of the Texas revolution with the other being the Battle of San Jacinto.
Of course the Texas revolutionary war should be put in context. But since the site is the ALAMO the primary information should be about the tactics and results of that Battle. You also should talk about the impact the Alamo had on the Texan revolution and the character of the Texan people.
At this point and AFTER explaining the BATTLE you can touch on the broader topis like: Why did Americans migrate to Texas? what other Mexican provinces rebelled - did you know others did but less successfully? How did Mexico gaining independence from Spain plant the seeds for the Texas rebellion only 15 years later? How did Santa Anna violate the new Mexican constitution to trigger the uprising? What role did the USA play in the Texas rebellion during and in the immediate aftermath? How did the Texas revolution lead to the Mexican/American war of 1848?
All sorts of stuff could be discussed and it would take more then a few soundbites to cover it all. And after you finish covering these relevant & important topics of the Battle of the Alamo then you can talk about slavery which played no real role in the Battle or the Texans quest for independence.
It's predictable that you wouldn't know the history here.
Without context, the BATTLE loses it's importance. There would have been no BATTLE without context. There would be no understanding of the BATTLE. smh.
Read how it's done. Context first and most important.
Gettysburg
There's a difference between teaching and indoctrination. The former leads with facts and context and trusts the learner to come to their own conclusions. The latter is you.
It's predictable that you would ignore or diminish the parts of Alamo history that don't fit within your facists dogma. Its predictable that you wouldn't want others to know those facts. It's predictable that instead of challenging facts put forward by your debate opponent's knowledge without actually providing evidence it was lacking. And let's face it, ... wiki..., You've not been able to challenge a single part of the history I stated. Try to keep up.
Every time you post you make clear limited understanding of scientific process and now it's clear, you cannot understand causal effects in history. There's a connect there.
There's not a war museum or battle monument anywhere that doesn't
put it in context FIRST so that those they are trying to teach, can understand the true meaning of the Battle. You only want this one to diminish the context because the context reflects those parts of history you prefer to ignore.
LOTR definition of Gettysburg should be, "duh, lots of people died here, fart, burp. Da good gyz won. Dat's all you need to know." lol